Thank you so much. Again, I apologize for creating a mess to clean up. Rest assured I've dialed down the ambition level to a more phased approach until I know the ins and outs of these scripts.
On Apr 4, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote: > starting to revert now, this will take some time for these huge changesets. > > > On 3 Apr 2010, at 19:41 , Richard Weait wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Kenneth Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Looks like I may have run into a serious error trying to figure out the NHD >>> data conversion. In trying to merge and upload the data for an entire >>> subbasin in order to keep duplicates down, I instead ran into an error in >>> my upload at some point during the process, leaving me with nearly 350,000 >>> orphaned nodes. o.O Lesson learned, it seems like a much better idea to >>> import the files (limited to 30,000 nodes each) individually, and deal with >>> duplicates as they happen. >>> >>> Instead of pushing my luck and working with the revert scripts, how can I >>> ask that a system admin revert the following changesets: 4309301, 4309425, >>> 4309533, 4309602, 4309662, 4309733, 4309777, 4309834. My mistake certainly >>> wasn't a malicious one, I have the genuine intent to improve the quality of >>> the maps throughout my state. >>> >>> Best, >>> Kenneth >> >> Thanks for bringing this to our attention Kenneth. Imports are tricky >> and we can all make mistakes. I've forwarded your revert request to >> "dev". >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
