* Phil! Gold <[email protected]> [2010-04-22 08:07 -0400]: > What about tagging similarly to the signage? The common portion would > be tagged, to take an example near me using your system, "name=I-695 > onramp", while the split would be "name=I-695 North / Towson onramp" and > "name=I-695 South / Glen Burnie onramp".
These suggestions prompted a discussion on IRC where it was pointed out that this is kind of an abuse of the name tag, since highway ramps technically don't usually have names. (What we're discussing are descriptions.) A couple people suggested using the destination_sign relation for my purposes, and I think it has the potential to work well, but I've sent an email to the talk list to continue the discussion. Please reply there rather than here. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- The router thinks it's a printer. -- BOFH excuse #118 ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
