How come no one has made the observation that "One should never tag for the renderers"?
Tag it as it exists, and away you go. James VE6SRV On 6/15/10, Andy Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote: > >> With your Eiffel Tower example, three different renderers are instructive. >> >> Cyclemap: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.85842&lon=2.29402&zoom=17&layers=00B0FTF >> >> Cyclemap appears not to render pedestrian areas. The >> highway=pedestrian, area=yes appears only as an outline. It appears >> that Cyclemap draws highway=pedestrian after buildings, so the >> pedestrian ways are shown on top of the tower. > > The opencyclemap handling of multipolygons is known to be broken, so > I'd advise caution on examining the output there. Similar problems > exist with pedestrian areas. I'm working on both these issues during > setup of the new server. > >> It also appears that the Eiffel Tower was seen by the SRTM mission, as >> there are elevation contours around the tower. Neat. > > Most large buildings have a contour around them on SRTM :-) Now as to > whether you consider that a feature... > > Cheers, > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
