That makes sense. These waterways were generated from the NHD2OSM scripts. Perhaps someone should consider updating them? I'm not knowledgable in Python, myself...
On Jan 6, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Richard Moss wrote: > > > > On Thu 06/01/11 10:37 , Richard Fairhurst [email protected] sent: >> > >> Potlatch 2 will only draw multipolygons which consist of 1 outer way and >> 1+inner ways, and where the tags are on the outer way. This multipolygon >> hasseveral outer ways so will not be rendered properly. >> >> You could call this a bug but, to be honest, if people are going to >> inventinsanely complicated relation structures (aka "advanced >> multipolygons") andcompletely go against existing OSM tagging practice >> (putting way tags >> onrelations), ... > > I am a bit new to relations, but I thought that the tagging should go on the > relation rather that the outer, as at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon : "Tags describing > the multipolygon (e.g., landuse=forest) should go on the relation. The outer > way(s) should be left untagged" > > Have I misunderstood something? > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
