Hello, Is it good practice to have a route relation that has two or more geographically separate parts as in this case: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2007201
Should the relation be split in two and a super relation created containing both? Also, is it good practice to have a route relation that "forks" or has spurs, reference the same route relation, at this specific location: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.48666&lon=-104.96196&zoom=17&layers=M Should this also handled with a super relation? Thanks, Mike
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
