Gys de Jongh wrote:
... Especially so when infact the error report is the only thing
that's wrong :(
Here is one of many examples :
network=rcn
note=23-62
route=bicycle
type=route
Relation ID=1263377
JOSM 7000 Validation :
Role forward unknown
Role backward unknown
JOSM does seem to have a habit of "crying wolf" more often now than it
used to - and if it's not explaining why it doesn't like
forward/backward on cycle route relations, then arguably that's a bug in
JOSM since it hasn't communicated the problem to you (or me). I'm not
sure how many people with in-depth knowledge of JOSM's validation rules
follow this list - but if you don't get an answer here you might try
asking on the help site:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/
or perhaps even the JOSM-dev list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
However, looking at the relation one thing does strike me as odd - it's
essentially two letter "Y"s joined together
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1263377#map=17/51.66097/5.28077&layers=CN
All way members have got forward or backward on them, apart from the bit
in the middle
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7075208#map=17/51.66096/5.27969&layers=CN
This means that, despite what ra.osmsurround.org says, it's not actually
contiguous. This may be deliberate, since it's part of a larger
relation (and it doesn't seem to be what JOSM's complaining about), but
I thought tha I'd better mention it just in case.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
