Thanks for the tip! I will keep that in mind when re-iterating, correcting previous work.
Sent from my iPhone > On 12 Jun 2015, at 12:15, Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:56:30AM +0100, SomeoneElse wrote: >>> On 12/06/2015 10:16, Arne Jakobsson wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> I draw buildings, and was taught somewhere that we should align >>> the building outline with its roof. Doing this, I ran into some >>> trouble. http://i.imgur.com/vaOFIb5.gif >>> The road intersect the building. This would not happen if we >>> instead just kept to aligning the building outline with its base. >>> Is there a right way to do this? >> >> Personally I always try and align building footprints with the base >> rather than the roof (otherwise very tall buildings would look very >> odd indeed). >> >> I can see why (if you were mapping lots of small buildings in e.g. a >> HOT response) it would be easier to say "just trace the roofs" - >> it'd get more buildings traced quickly at a good enough quality >> (which surely is the aim there), but as a general principle where >> time isn't an issue I'd certainly try and trace the building >> footprint. > > As the parallax-shift is the same for the full of the sat image you can > also draw 100 Buildings and shift them at once > > Just make shure that you are not shift already shifted buildings or > buildings taken from images with a different parallax problem. > > Flo > -- > Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de > We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today! > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > newbies@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list newbies@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
