On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 21:33, Yanal Ansouqa wrote:
> I am not sure why open-source advocates are already discussing what 
> alternatives to use in the Linux world since RH basically gave the 
> community "control" over the operating system. But that is irrelevant. 
> What is relevant to me is "will the BYU uug group chose an alternative 
> to RH?" we do mainly discuss and use RH in this group, will we move to 
> something else? what are your thoughts?

I'm sticking with Fedora, even on some servers.  For the real mission
critical servers that must remain stable at all costs, I plan to
continue running RedHat 7.3 for the next year or two, backporting
security patches.  There's also a project to continue security updates
for redhat 7.3.  

If you were running 9, there's no reason not to upgrade to fedora core. 
If you're running 7.3, you might consider Whitebox linux, which is a
recompile of Redhat Enterprise Linux sources (making it equivalent in
every way to RHEL, except you can obtain it without buying a service
contract).

Note that RHEL can only be obtained from RedHat with a service contract,
and that contract stipulates that you can only install RHEL on one
machine (and the contract can only cover one machine).  However, the OS
itself is still GPL, and if you obtained an iso of it from a source
other than RedHat, you can legally use it.  Also, if you cancel your
contract with RedHat, or it expires, you can continue using RHEL and
install it on as many machines as you'd like.  So really all this
slashdot talk is really a tempest over nothing, in my opinion.

Other alternatives (commercial) include SuSE, which is expected to grow
in popularity.  Debian, is, well, Debian.  And always will be. 
Mandrake, well, expect them to struggle greatly in the enterprise
market.  Gentoo will never make strong inroads in the enterprise server
arena.  That's okay, though, since gentoo is aimed more at the hacker
end user community.

Michael


> 
> 
> http://slashdot.org/articles/04/01/15/232212.shtml?tid=110&tid=164&tid=185&tid=187
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> newbies mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
-- 
Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies

Reply via email to