(dear nettimers, this is a shortened version, first published in the
german and danish editions of lettre internationale, of my ongoing
essay on blogging. it was published recently on the web by
http://www.eurozine.com. an extended version will appear in my next
book zero comments that routledge new york plans to put in july 2007.
the editor has not done anything with manuscript ever since I submitted
early september 2006, so that was kind of encouraging news... if you
are interested to read the pdf version and would know publishers would
could do a translation, let me know. routledge only owns the rights to
the english version. best, geert)

http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-01-02-lovink-en.html

Blogging, the Nihilist Impulse
By Geert Lovink

"An der rationalen Tiefe erkennt man den Radikalen; im Verlust der
rationalen Methode kündigt sich der Nihilismus an. Der Radikale besitzt
immer eine Theorie; aber der Nihilist setzt an ihre Stelle die
Stimmung." Max Bense (1949)

Weblogs or blogs are the successors of the '90s Internet "homepage" and
create a mix of the private (online dairy) and the public (self-PR
management). According to the latest rough estimates of the Blog
Herald,[1] there are 100 million blogs worldwide, and it is nearly
impossible to make general statements about their "nature" and divide
them into proper genres. I will nonetheless attempt to do this. It is
of strategic importance to develop critical categories of a theory of
blogging that takes the specific mixture of technology, interface
design, software architecture, and social networking into account.

Instead of merely looking into the emancipatory potential of blogs, or
emphasizing their counter-cultural folklore, I see blogs as part of an
unfolding process of "massification" of this still new medium. What the
Internet lost after 2000 was the "illusion of change". This void made
way for large-scale, interlinked conversations through freely available
automated software.

A blog is commonly defined as a frequent, chronological publication of
personal thoughts and Web links, a mixture of what is happening in a
person's life and what is happening on the Web and in the world out
there.[2] A blog allows for the easy creation of new pages: text and
pictures are entered into an online form (usually with the title, the
category, and the body of the article) and this is then submitted.
Automated templates take care of adding the article to the home page,
creating the new full article page (called permalink), and adding the
article to the appropriate date- or category-based archive. Because of
the tags that the author puts onto each posting, blogs let us filter by
date, category, author, or other attributes. They (usually) allow the
administrator to invite and add other authors, whose permissions and
access are easily managed.[3]

Microsoft's in-house blogger Robert Scoble lists five elements that
made blogs so hot. The first is the "ease of publishing", the second he
calls "discoverability", the third is "cross-site conversations", the
fourth is permalinking (giving the entry a unique and stable URL), and
the last is syndication (replication of content elsewhere).[4] Lyndon
from Flock Blog gives a few tips for blog writing, showing how ideas,
feelings, and experiences can be turned into news format, and showing
how dominant PowerPoint has become: "Make your opinion known, link like
crazy, write less, 250 words is enough, make headlines snappy, write
with passion, include bullet point lists, edit your post, make your
posts easy to scan, be consistent with your style, litter the post with
keywords."[5] Whereas the email-based list culture echoes a postal
culture of writing letters and occasionally essays, the ideal blog post
is defined by snappy public relations techniques.

Web services like blogs cannot be separated from the output they
generate. The politics and aesthetics defined by first users will
characterize the medium for decades to come. Blogs appeared during the
late 1990s, in the shadow of dot-com mania.[6] Blog culture was not
developed enough to be dominated by venture capital with its hysterical
demo-or-die-now-or-never mentality. Blogs first appeared as casual
conversations that could not easily be commodified. Building a
laid-back parallel world made it possible for blogs to form the
crystals (a term developed by Elias Canetti) from which millions of
blogs grew and, around 2003, reached critical mass.

Blogging in the post-9/11 period closed the gap between Internet and
society. Whereas dot-com suits dreamt of mobbing customers flooding
their e-commerce portals, blogs were the actual catalysts that realized
worldwide democratization of the Net. As much as "democratization"
means "engaged citizens", it also implies normalization (as in setting
of norms) and banalization. We can't separate these elements and only
enjoy the interesting bits. According to Jean Baudrillard, we're living
in the "Universe of Integral Reality". "If there was in the past an
upward transcendence, there is today a downward one. This is, in a
sense, the second Fall of Man Heidegger speaks of: the fall into
banality, but this time without any possible redemption."[7] If you
can't cope with high degrees of irrelevance, blogs won't be your cup of
tea.

The motor behind the expansion of the blogosphere is the move away from
code towards content. There is no more need for empty demo design.
Blogs are not a test or proposition. They actually exist. From early
on, blog culture has been the home of creative and social content
producers. I hesitate to say journalists and academics, because despite
the fact that many have such a professional background, it would be
false to locate pioneer bloggers inside institutional setups. Yet they
weren't anti-institutional either. Much like '90s cyberculture, the
first generation of bloggers possess colorful biographies. However, a
dominant culture, such as the Californian techno-hippies, failed to
emerge and if it exists, it is tricky to label. Blogging comes close to
what Adilkno once described as "vague media".[8] The lack of direction
is not a failure but the core asset. Blogging did not emerge out of a
movement or an event. If anything, it is a special effect of software,
constituted especially by the automation of links, a not-overly-complex
technical interface design issue.

There is a presumption that blogs have a symbiotic relationship with
the news industry. This thesis is not uncontested. Hypertext scholars
track blogs back to the hypercards of the 1980s and the online
literature wave of the 1990s, in which clicking from one document to
the next was the central activity of the reader. For some reason, the
hypertext subcurrent lost out and what remains is an almost
self-evident equation between blogs and the news industry.

It is not easy to answer the question of whether blogs operate inside
or outside the media industry. To position the blog medium inside could
be seen as opportunistic, whereas others see this as a clever move.
There is also a "tactical" aspect. The blogger-equals-journalist might
get protection from such a label in case of censorship and repression.
Despite countless attempts to feature blogs as alternatives to
mainstream media, they are often, more precisely described as "feedback
channels". The act of "gatewatching" (Axel Bruns) the mainstream media
outlets does not necessarily result in reasonable comments that will be
taken into account. In the category "insensitive" we have a wide range,
from hilarious to mad, sad, and sick. What CNN, newspapers, and radio
stations the world over have failed to do – namely to integrate open,
interactive messages from their constituencies – blogs do for them. To
"blog" a news report doesn't mean that the blogger sits down and
thoroughly analyzes the discourse and circumstances, let alone checks
the facts on the ground. To blog merely means to quickly point to news
fact through a link and a few sentences that explain why the blogger
found this or that factoid interesting or remarkable, or is disagrees
with it.

Blog entries are often hastily written personal musings, sculptured
around a link or event. In most cases, bloggers simply do not have the
time, skills, or financial means for proper research. There are
collective research blogs working on specific topics, but these are
rare. What ordinary blogs create is a dense cloud of "impressions"
around a topic. Blogs will tell you if your audience is still awake and
receptive. Blogs test. They allow you to see whether your audience is
still awake and receptive. In that sense we could also say that blogs
are the outsourced, privatized test beds, or rather unit tests[9] of
the big media.

The boundaries between the mediasphere and the blogsphere are fluid. A
detailed social analysis would, most likely, uncover a grey area of
freelance media makers moving back and forth. From early on,
journalists working for "old media" ran blogs. So how do blogs relate
to independent investigative journalism? At first glance, they look
like oppositional, or potentially supplementary practices. Whereas the
investigative journalist works months, if not years, to uncover a
story, bloggers look more like an army of ants contributing to the
great hive called "public opinion". Bloggers rarely add new facts to a
news story. They find bugs in products and news reports but rarely
"unmask" spin, let alone come up with well-researched reports.

Cecile Landman, a Dutch investigative journalist and supporter of Iraqi
bloggers with the Streamtime campaign, knows both worlds. "Journalists
need to make a living. They can't put just anything online. Bloggers
don't seem to bother too much about this, and that does create a
conflict." According to Landman, blogging is changing the existing
formats of information. "People are getting bored with the given
formats; they don't catch up with the news anymore, it no longer sticks
to their cervical memory stick. It is like a song that you have
listened to too often, or a commercial advertisement; you hear it, you
can even sing the words, but they are without meaning. Mainstream media
is starting to grasp this. They have to search for new formats in order
to attract readers (read: advertisers)" – and blogs are but a small
chapter in this transformation.

A weblog is the "voice of a person" (Dave Winer). It is a digital
extension of oral traditions more than a new form of writing.[10]
Through blogging, news is being transformed from a lecture into a
conversation. Blogs echo rumours and gossip, conversations in cafes and
bars, on squares and in corridors. They record "the events of the day"
(Jay Rosen). Today's "recordability" of situations is such that we are
no longer upset that computers "read" all our moves and expressions
(sound, image, text) and "write" them into strings of zeros and ones.
In that sense, blogs fit into the wider trend in which all our
movements and activities are being monitored and stored. In the case of
blogs, this is carried out not by some invisible and abstract authority
but the subjects themselves, who record their everyday lives.[11]

The blog hype cannot measure up to the dot-com hysteria of the late
1990s. The economic and political landscape is simply too different.
What interested me in this case was the oft-heard remark that blogs
were cynical and nihilist. Instead of brushing off this accusation, I
did a trial and ran both keywords through the systems to test if they
were hardwired virtues, consolidated inside Blog Nation. Instead of
portraying bloggers as "An Army of Davids", as Instapundit blogger
Glenn Reynolds' book title suggests,[12] it might be better to study
the techno-mentality of users and not presume that bloggers are
underdogs on a mission to beat Goliath.

Historically it makes sense to see "Internet cynicism" as a response to
millennium madness. In January 2001, the dot-com magazine Clickz wrote:
"Among investors, consumers, and the media, there's a pervasive sense
that all the promises about the Internet have amounted to one huge,
bold-faced lie – and that we're now paying for the sins of yesterday's
over-exuberance."[13] In My First Recession (2003), I mapped the
post-dot-com hangover. In this light, cynicism is nothing other than
the discursive rubble of a collapsed belief system, cold turkey after
the Market Rush, the retrospectively optimistic-innocent Clinton years
of globalization (1993-2000), so well embodied in Hardt/Negri's Empire.

It would be ridiculous to collectively denounce bloggers as cynics.
Cynicism, in this context, is not a character trait but a techno-social
condition. The argument is not that bloggers are predominantly cynics
in nature, or vulgar exhibitionists who lack understatement. It is
important to note the Zeitgeist into which blogging as a mass practice
emerged. Net cynicism is a cultural spin-off from blogging software,
hardwired in a specific era and resulting from procedures such as
login, link, edit, create, browse, read, submit, tag, and reply. Some
would judge the mere use of the term cynicism as blog bashing. So be
it. Again, we're not talking about an attitude here, let alone a shared
life style. Net cynicism no longer believes in cyberculture as an
identity provider with related entrepreneurial hallucinations. It is
constituted by cold enlightenment as a post-political condition and by
confession described by Michel Foucault. People are taught that their
liberation requires them to "tell the truth", to confess it to someone
(a priest, psychoanalyst, or weblog), and this truth telling will
somehow set them free.[14]

There is a quest for truth in blogging. But it is a truth with a
question mark. Truth has become an amateur project, not an absolute
value, sanctioned by higher authorities. In lieu of a common
definition, we could say that cynicism is the unpleasant way of
performing the truth.[15] The Internet is not a religion or a mission
in itself. For some it turns into an addiction, but that can be healed
like any other medical problem. The post-dot-com/post-9/11 condition
borders on a "passionate conservatism", but in the end rejects the
dot-com petit bourgeois morals and their double standards of cheating
and hiding, cooking the books and then being rewarded fat pay checks.
The question is therefore: how much truth can a medium bear? Knowledge
is sorrow, and the "knowledge society" propagators have not yet taken
this into account.

Net cynicism is frank, first and foremost about itself. The blog
application is an online commodity with a clear use-by date. Spokker
Jones: "Forty years from now when the Internet collapses in a giant
implosion of stupidity I want to be able to say, 'I was there'." It is
said that Internet cynicism has given rise to sites like Netslaves.com,
which is dedicated to "horror stories of working the Web". It's a
sounding board for those "burned by the incompetence, moronic planning,
and hysterical management of new-media companies".[16] Exhibitionism
equals empowerment. Saying aloud what you think or feel, in the legacy
of De Sade, is not only an option – in the liberal sense of "choice" –
but an obligation, an immediate impulse to respond in order to be out
there, with everybody else.

In the Internet context, it is not evil, as Rüdiger Safranski
suggested, but instead triviality which is the "drama of freedom". As
Baudrillard states: "All of our values are simulated. What is freedom?
We have a choice between buying one car or buying another car?"[17] And
to follow Baudrillard, we could say that blogs are a gift to humankind
that no one needs. This is the true shock. Did anyone order the
development of blogs? There is no possibility to simply ignore blogs
and live the comfortable lifestyle of a twentieth-century "public
intellectual". Like Michel Houellebecq, bloggers are trapped by their
own inner contradictions in the Land of No Choice. The London Times
noted that Houellebecq "writes from inside alienation. His bruised male
heroes, neglected by their parents, cope by depriving themselves of
loving interactions; they project their coldness and loneliness on to
the world." Blogs are perfect projection fields for such an
undertaking.

Italian theorist Paulo Virno provides clues to how we could use the
term cynicism in a non-derogative manner. Virno sees cynicism as
connected to the "chronic instability of forms of life and linguistic
games". At the base of contemporary cynicism Virno sees the fact that
men and women first experience rules, far more often than "facts", and
far earlier than they experience concrete events. Virno: "But to
experience rules directly means also to recognize their conventionality
and groundlessness. Thus, one is no longer immersed in a predefined
'game', participating therein with true allegiance. Instead, one
catches a glimpse of oneself in individual 'games' which are destitute
of all seriousness and obviousness, having become nothing more than a
place for immediate self-affirmation – a self-affirmation which is all
the more brutal and arrogant, in short, cynical, the more it draws
upon, without illusions but with perfect momentary allegiance, those
same rules which characterize conventionality and mutability."[18]

How is cynical reason connected to criticism? Is cynical media culture
a critical practice? So far it has not proven useful to interpret blogs
as a new form of literary criticism. Such an undertaking is bound to
fail. The "crisis of criticism" has been announced time and again and
blog culture has simply ignored this dead-end street. There is no need
for a "new-media" clone of Terry Eagleton. We live long after the Fall
of Theory. Criticism has become a conservative and affirmative
activity, in which the critic alternates between losses of value while
celebrating the spectacle of the marketplace. It would be interesting
to investigate why criticism has not become popular, and aligned itself
with such new-media practices as blogging, as cultural studies
popularized everything except theory. Let's not blame the Blogging
Other for the moral bankruptcy of the postmodern critic. Instead of
conceptual depth we get broad associations, a people's hermeneutics of
news events.[19] The computable comments of the millions can be made
searchable and visually displayed, for instance, as buzz clouds.
Whether these maps provide us with any knowledge or not is another
matter. It is easy to judge the rise of comments as regressive compared
to the clear-cut authority of the critic. Insularity and provincialism
have taken their toll. The panic and obsession around the professional
status of the critic has been such that the created void has now been
filled by passionate amateur bloggers. One thing is sure: blogs do not
shut down thought.

Wikipedia amateur encyclopedians describe cynics as "those inclined to
disbelieve in human sincerity, in virtue, or in altruism: individuals
who maintain that only self-interest motivates human behaviour. A
modern cynic typically has a highly contemptuous attitude towards
social norms, especially those which serve more of a ritualistic
purpose than a practical one, and will tend to dismiss a substantial
proportion of popular beliefs, conventional morality, and accepted
wisdom as irrelevant or obsolete nonsense." In a networked environment,
such a definition becomes problematic as it portrays the user as an
isolated subject, opposed to groups or society as a whole. Net cynicism
is not a gateway to drugs or anything nasty. To talk about "evil" as an
abstract category is irrelevant in this context. There is no immediate
danger. It's all fine. The idea is not to create a dialectical
situation. There is only a feeling of stagnation amidst constant
change. We could call it "romanticism of the open eyes". According to
Peter Sloterdijk, cynicism is "enlightened false consciousness".[20] A
cynic, so Sloterdijk says, is someone who is part of an institution or
group whose existence and values he himself can no longer see as
absolute, necessary, and unconditional, and who is miserable due to
this enlightenment, because he or she sticks to principles he or she
does not believe in.

The only knowledge left for a cynic is trust in reason, which, however,
cannot provide him (or her) with a firm basis for action, yet another
reason for being miserable.[21] Following Sloterdijk, cynicism is a
common problem. The question of whether it is universal or limited to
Western societies is too big to be discussed here, but most certainly
we see it on a global scale in knowledge-intensive sectors.

We're operating in a post-deconstruction world in which blogs offer a
never-ending stream of confessions, a cosmos of micro-opinions
attempting to interpret events beyond the well-known twentieth-century
categories. The nihilist impulse emerges as a response to the
increasing levels of complexity within interconnected topics. There is
little to say if all occurrences can be explained through
post-colonialism, class analysis, and gender perspectives. However,
blogging arises against this kind of political analysis, through which
a lot can no longer be said.

Blogs express personal fear, insecurity, and disillusionment, anxieties
looking for partners in crime. We seldom find passion (except for the
act of blogging itself). Often blogs unveil doubt and insecurity about
what to feel, what to think, believe, and like. They carefully compare
magazines, and review traffic signs, nightclubs, and t-shirts. This
stylized uncertainty circles around the general assumption that blogs
ought to be biographical while simultaneously reporting about the world
outside. Their emotional scope is much wider than other media due to
the informal atmosphere of blogs. Mixing public and private is
essential here. What blogs play with is the emotional register, varying
from hate to boredom, passionate engagement, sexual outrage, and back
to everyday boredom.

Blogging is neither a project nor a proposal but a condition whose
existence one must recognize. "We blog," as Kline and Bernstein say.
It's today's a priori. Australian cultural theorist Justin Clemens
explains: "Nihilism is not just another epoch amongst a succession of
others: it is the finally accomplished form of a disaster that happened
a long time ago."[22] To translate this into new-media terms: blogs are
witnessing and documenting the diminishing power of mainstream media,
but they have consciously not replaced its ideology with an
alternative. Users are tired of top-down communication – and yet have
nowhere else to go. "There is no other world" could be read as a
response to the anti-globalization slogan, "Another world is possible".

Caught in the daily grind of blogging, there is a sense that the
Network is the alternative. It is not correct to judge blogs merely on
the basis of their content. Media theory has never done this and should
also in this case shy away from this method. Blogging is a nihilistic
venture precisely because the ownership structure of mass media is
questioned and then attacked. Blogging is a bleed-to-death strategy.
Implosion is not the right word. Implosion implies a tragedy and
spectacle that is not present here. Blogging is the opposite of the
spectacle. It is flat (and yet meaningful). Blogging is not a digital
clone of the "letter to the editor". Instead of complaining and
arguing, the blogger puts him or herself in the perversely pleasurable
position of media observer.

The commenting on mainstream culture, its values and products, should
be read as an open withdrawal of attention. The eyeballs that once
patiently looked at all reports and ads have gone on strike. According
to the utopian blog philosophy, mass media are doomed. Their role will
be taken over by "participatory media". The terminal diagnosis has been
made and it states: closed top-down organizations no longer work,
knowledge cannot be "managed", today's work is collaborative and
networked. However, despite continuous warning signs, the system
successfully continues to (dys)function. Is top-down really on its way
out? Where does the Hegelian certainty come from that the old-media
paradigm will be overthrown? There is little factual evidence of this.
And it is this state of ongoing affairs that causes nihilism, and not
revolutions, to occur.

As Justin Clemens rightly states, "nihilism often goes unremarked, not
because it is no longer an issue of contemporary philosophy and theory,
but – on the contrary – because it is just so uncircumventable and
dominating."[23] The term has dropped almost completely out of
establishment political discourse. The reason for this could be the
"banalization of nihilism" (Karen Carr). Or to rephrase it: the absence
of high art that can be labeled as such. This might have changed with
the rise of writers such as Michel Houellebecq. Andre Gluckmann
explained the 2005 migrant riots in the French suburbs as a "response
to French nihilism".[24] What the revolting youth did was an "imitation
of negation". The "problem of nihilism", as Clemens notes, is the
complex, subtle, and self-reflexive nature of the term. To historicize
the concept is one way out, though I will leave that to the historians.
Another way could be to occupy the term and reload it with surprising
energies: creative nihilism.

Blogs bring on decay. Each new blog is supposed to add to the fall of
the media system that once dominated the twentieth century. This
process is not one of a sudden explosion. The erosion of the mass media
cannot easily be traced in figures of stagnant sales and the declining
readership of newspapers. In many parts of the world, television is
still on the rise. What's declining is the Belief in the Message. That
is the nihilist moment, and blogs facilitate this culture as no
platform has ever done before. Sold by the positivists as citizen media
commentary, blogs assist users in their crossing from Truth to
Nothingness. The printed and broadcasted message has lost its aura.
News is consumed as a commodity with entertainment value. Instead of
lamenting the ideological color of the news, as previous generations
have done, we blog as a sign of the regained power of the spirit. As a
micro-heroic, Nietzschean act of the pajama people, blogging grows out
of a nihilism of strength, not out of the weakness of pessimism.
Instead of time and again presenting blog entries as self-promotion, we
should interpret them as decadent artifacts that remotely dismantle the
mighty and seductive power of the broadcast media.

Bloggers are nihilists because they are "good for nothing". They post
into Nirvana and have turned their futility into a productive force.
They are the nothingists who celebrate the death of the centralized
meaning structures and ignore the accusation that they would only
produce noise. They are disillusionists whose conduct and opinions are
regarded worthless.[25] Justin Clemens notes that the term nihilism has
been replaced by such appellations as "anti-democratic", "terrorist",
and "fundamentalist". However, over the past years there has been a
noticeable renaissance of the term, though usually not more than a
passing remark. Significant theorization of the "condition" was done in
the mid-twentieth century, which included reworking sources from the
nineteenth century like Kierkegaard, Stirner, and Nietzsche.
Existentialism after the two World Wars theorized Gulag, Auschwitz, and
Hiroshima as manifestations of Organized Evil that resulted in an
overall crisis of the existing belief systems. For those still
interested in Theory, Arthur Kroker's The Will to Technology & The
Culture of Nihilism (2004) is a must read as it puts Heidegger,
Nietzsche, and Marx in a contemporary, techno-nihilist perspective.

We're faced with an "accomplished nihilism" (Gianni Vattimo) in that
bloggers have understood that the fulfillment of nihilism is a
fact.[26] Gianni Vattimo argues that nihilism is not the absence of
meaning but a recognition of the plurality of meanings; it is not the
end of civilization but the beginning of new social paradigms, with
blogging being one of them. Commonly associated with the pessimistic
belief that all of existence is meaningless, nihilism would be an
ethical doctrine that there are no moral absolutes or infallible
natural laws and that "truth" is inescapably subjective. In media
terms, we see this attitude translated into a growing distrust of the
output of large commercial news organizations and the spin that
politicians and their advisers produce. Questioning the message is no
longer a subversive act of engaged citizens but the a priori attitude,
even before the TV or PC has been switched on.

Nihilism designates the impossibility of opposition – a state of
affairs which, unsurprisingly, generates a great deal of anxiety.
Nihilism is not a monolithic belief system. We no longer "believe" in
Nothing as in nineteenth-century Russia or post-war Paris. Nihilism is
no longer a danger or problem, but the default postmodern condition. It
is an unremarkable, even banal feature of life, as Karen Carr writes is
and no longer related to the Religious Question. Blogs are neither
religious nor secular. They are "post-virtue". The paradoxical
temporality of nihilism today is that of a not-quite-already-Now.
Following Giorgio Agamben, Justin Clements writes that "nihilism is not
just another epoch amongst a succession of others: it is the finally
accomplished form of a disaster that occurred long ago."[27] In the
media context this would be the moment in which mass media lost their
claim on the Truth and could no longer operate as authority. Let us not
date this event in time, as such an insightful moment can be both
personal and cultural-historical. It is the move from the festive
McLuhan to the nihilist Baudrillard that every media user is going
through, found in the ungroundedness of networked discourse that users
fool around with.

Translating Karen Carr's insight to today's condition, we could say
that the blogger is an individual "who lives in self-conscious
confrontation with a meaningless world, refusing either to deny or
succumb to its power."[28] Yet this does not result in a heroic
gesture. Blogging does not grow out of boredom, nor out of some
existential void. Carr rightly remarks that "for many postmodernists,
the presence of nihilism evokes not terror but a yawn".[29] Compared to
previous centuries, its crisis value has diminished. If bloggers are
classified nihilists, it merely means that they stopped believing in
the media.

"The global always-on, always-linked, always-immediate public
conversation" speeds up the fragmentation of the media landscape. Kline
and Burnstein disagree here (they ain't no nihilists). "Rather than
seeing the proliferation of specialty blogs as an indicator of the
fragmentation of our society, we should see this trend as providing a
way for citizen-experts to emerge and to bring together global
constituencies in many disparate fields."[30] Seen from the political
class perspective, hand-picked bloggers can be instrumentalized as
"opinion indicators".[31] However, they can just as easily be dismissed
the next day as "pajama journalists" and ignored as noise. As every
hype necessarily has to crash, the wave of negative PR is
pre-programmed. Bloggers might communicate what issues people tell the
media they want to think about. But once the hotness has worn off, who
cares? The nihilism starts there, after the fall of the blogs, the
stolen laptop, crashed server, unreadable back-up files, disappeared
online service provider, "comments (0)". That's when we can truly show
off our Pathos des Umsonst, the gesture of Being in Vain.

Business writer David Kline just can't help but take up his New Age
tone when he explains that despite all the existing nihilism, blogging
is not in vain. "The truth is that these are not just the tiresome
ramblings of the boring written to the bored. Though for the most part
not professional writers, bloggers are often eloquent in the way that
those who are not self-consciously polished often are – raw,
uncensored, and energized by the sound of their newly awakened voices.
And by keeping a daily record of their rites of passage, bloggers often
give a shape and meaning to the stages and cycles of their lives that
would otherwise be missed in the helter-skelter of modern
existence."[32] Foucault scholars would say something similar, namely
that blogs are "technologies of the self".[33] But what if the "self"
has run out of batteries? With Dominic Pettman we could say that
blogging is a relentless pursuit in the age of exhaustion.[34] Blogs
explore what happens once you've smashed the illusion that there is a
"persona" behind the avalanche of similar lifestyle choices and pop
identities within online social networks.

No matter how much talk there is of "community" and "mobs", the fact
remains that blogs are primarily used as a tool to manage the self.
With management I refer here as much to the need to structure one's
life, to clear up the mess, to master the immense flows of information,
as to PR and promotion of Ich AG, as it is called in crisis-ridden
Germany. Blogs are part of a wider culture that fabricates celebrity on
every possible level. Some complain that blogs are too personal, even
egocentric, whereas most blog readers indulge in exhibitionist insights
and can't get enough of it. Claire E. Write advises blog writers not to
offer the possibility to leave comments. "A few bloggers maintain that
blogs that don't allow reader comments are not 'real' blogs. Most
bloggers don't follow that line of thinking and believe that reader
comments turn a blog into a message board.

The essence of a blog is not the interactivity of the medium: it is the
sharing of the thoughts and opinions of the blogger. Adding comments to
your blog opens up a host of problems: you will spend a great deal of
time policing the posts, weeding out spam and trolls, and answering
endless technical questions from registrants."[35] This advice
obviously goes against the core values of the A-list bloggers. Isn't it
interesting that blogging services offer the possibility to swich off
comments after all? For instance, Cluetrain Manifesto guru David
Weinberger states that "blogs are not a new form of journalism nor do
they primarily consist of teenagers whining about their teachers. Blogs
are not even primarily a form of individual expression. They are better
understood as conversations."[36]

Are bloggers risk takers? Of course blog culture is different from the
entrepreneurial risk cult embodied by management gurus such as Tom
Peters. Much like Ulrich Beck defined risk, bloggers deal with hazards
and insecurities induced by never-ending waves of modernization. What
is blogged is the relentless uncertainty of the everyday. Whereas
entrepreneurs colonize the future, energized by collective
hallucinations, bloggers expose the present they find themselves caught
in. Blogging is the answer to "individualization of social inequality".
It hits back, not so much with collective action, but with massive
hyper-individual linking. This is the network paradox: there is
simultaneous construction and destruction of the social at hand. The
timid internalization ends and transforms into radical revelation. No
website anticipated this practice better then the Fucked Company
website,[37] a predecessor of blog culture where employees of New
Economy firms anonymously post rumors and complaints, and even more
interesting: internal memos. Bloggers disrupt the disrupters. They
override the constant talk about "change". It is remarkably easy to
attack the post-modern corporation as it solely depends on a hollow
public image, developed by third-party consultants. Online diaries,
rants, and comments so easily defy the manufactured harmony that
community engineering aims at.

In Cornel West's 2004 Democracy Matters is a chapter called "Nihilism
in America".[38] West distinguishes between the evangelical nihilism of
the neo-conservatives around Bush and a paternalistic version practiced
by Democrats like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. A third form, the
so-called "sentimental nihilism", prefers to remain on the surface of
problems rather than pursue their substantive depth. It pays simplistic
lip service to issues rather than portraying their complexity."[39]
This tendency to remain on the surface, touch a topic, point to an
article without even giving a proper opinion about it apart from it
being worth mentioning, is widespread and is foundational to blogging.
How many of the postings, we can ask with Cornel West, are Socratic
questioning? Why is the blogosphere so obsessed with measuring,
counting, and feeding, and so little with rhetoric, aesthetics, and
ethics? We should not end with moral questions. The wish to overcome
nihilism goes back to Nietzsche and is also relevant in the context of
blogging. How to overcome meaninglessness without falling back into
centralized meaning structures is the challenge that the blogging
millions pose.

"Try to build up yourself and you build a ruin" (Augustine). This also
counts for blogs. What seems to be a standard yet customized,
user-friendly medium turns out to be unreliable if you are at it over a
longer period of time. Most blogs which users haven't touched for three
months are wiped from the server. The liquid self may have thought to
find refuge in providers such as blogger.com or blogspot.com, but most
blog services prove to be unstable when it comes to archiving the
millions of blogs they host. The average age of a webpage is 6 months,
so it says, and there is no reason to believe that this is not the case
with blogs. As Alex Havias writes, "many weblogs are short-lived, and
in any event, we can assume that all weblogs are likely to be kept in
operation for a finite amount of time. These local archives need to be
duplicated elsewhere. At present there is nothing as simple as RSS that
allows for these archives to be duplicated."[40] The popular saying
that the Internet will remember everything is turning into a myth. "If
your website is not simple to update, you will not update it." That was
a problem in the 1990s. The problem now is: "If you don't update your
blog, we'll delete it." Even if the corpse of the blog can be
reconstructed, for instance through archive.org, the problem remains of
highly duplicated multimedia content. Alex Halavias suggests that
instead of a centralized server, the model of a peer-to-peer archive
could be a solution.

How can blog culture transcend the true, yet boring accusation that it
is only interested in itself? Having a thriving scene of anonymous
personas, like in Iran, is exciting, but not a real alternative for the
rest of the world. Role playing is not going to provide us with a way
out either, even though it might be interesting to investigate how
blogs and MMORPGs (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games)
relate. At the moment these are large parallel universes.[41] Instead
we could speak, after Stephen Greenblatt, about online self-fashioning.
The theatrical pose is made explicit in this term and brings together
elements of the self (diary, introspection) with the spectacle of the
blogocratic few that fight over the attention of the millions. In the
context of blogs, Matthew Berk speaks about "digital self-fashioning".
According to Berk, "online people constitute themselves as assemblies
of documents and other data designed for people to read and establish
some relationship. The more structure in and between this content, the
greater is its action potential."[42] The self is defined in a
normative way as the capacity to craft links between content chunks.

Nicholas Carr has called the Web 2.0 hype, blogs included,
"amoral".[43] "Of course the mainstream media see the blogosphere as a
competitor. It is a competitor. And, given the economics of the
competition, it may well turn out to be a superior competitor. The
layoffs we've recently seen at major newspapers may just be the
beginning, and those layoffs should be cause not for self-satisfied
snickering but for despair. Implicit in the ecstatic visions of Web 2.0
is the hegemony of the amateur." This political empowerment move is
captured as a computated "wisdom of crowds". What individual blog
owners proudly see as a great post is, seen from the larger picture of
the Internet, with its one billion users, an ever shifting collection
of buzzword clouds, consisting of trillions of clicks and micro
opinions. The more we know about this meta level, through sophisticated
software tools, the more depressed one can get about the overall
direction. Blogs do not arise from political movements or social
concerns. They have an "obsessive focus on the realization of the self,
" says Andrew Keen of the Weekly Standard. Keen foresees a pessimistic
turn: "If you democratize media, then you end up democratizing talent.
The unintended consequence of all this democratization, to misquote Web
2.0 apologist Thomas Friedman, is cultural 'flattening'." And Nicholas
Carr adds: "In the end we're left with nothing more than 'the flat
noise of opinion' - Socrates's nightmare."[44] Interesting to see how
fast the animosity inside Web 2.0 communities is changing.

George Gilder, the Carl Schmitt of new media, once stated: "As
capitalism releases creative energies everywhere, it leads to much
greater diversity, including diversity of media. The whole blogosphere
is an example of how transcending the top-down hierarchical models of
old-media technology with new-media technology releases diversity and
new voices and creations."[45] Against this commonly held view that
diversity is a good thing, we can hold the loss that comes with the
disappearance of familiarity and common references. Blogging alone
(after Robert D. Putman's Bowling Alone) is a social reality which
cannot easily be dismissed. Most blogging is what Bernard Siegert calls
"ghost communication". "Networking begins and ends with pure
self-referentiality,"[46] Friedrich Kittler writes, and this
autopoeisis is nowhere as clear as in the blogosphere. Social protocols
of opinion, deception, and belief cannot be separated from the
technical reality of the networks, and in the case of the blogs, this
turns out to be a treadmill.

Once upon a time, back in February 2004, the meme of the Internet being
an "ego chamber" showed up. Searls, Weinberg, Ito, and Boyd... they
were all there. Danah Boyd wrote: "One of the biggest motivators for a
lot of people to get online in the 1990s was to find people like them.
The goal wasn't to solidify or to diversity, but to feel validated.
Suggesting solidification/diversification implies that the primary
motivation behind engaging online is to participate in purposeful
dialogue, to be educated and educate. Frankly, I don't believe this to
be true." Shelly Parks had noted earlier about blogging: "Do you write
to be part of a community? Or do you write to write, and the community
part either happens, or doesn't?"[47] In this context Danah Boyd
referred to social networks and the homophily concept (that birds of a
feather stick together). It seems that in the blogging context,
explicit self-referential group building is still a new concept. Blogs
create archipelagos of inward links but these ties are very weak. On
top of that, not only do bloggers usually refer and answer only to
members of their online tribe, but they have no comprehensive idea of
how it could look to include one's adversaries. Blogrolls (link lists)
unconciously preassume that if you include a blog you agree or at least
sympathize with its maker. We link to what's interesting and cool. This
is a key problem in the Google and Amazon model, in which links are
traded as recommendations.

Because of the vastness of the blog plain, it is not a contested space.
First of all, differences of opinion have to exist already and do not
fall out of sky. Manufacturing opinion is a fine art of ideology
creation. Debating should not be mixed up with a netwar style of
campaigning in which existing (political) flights are being played out
on the Net. The pushy tone is what makes blogs so rhetorically poor.
What lacks in the software architecture is the very existence of an
equal dialogue partner. The result of this is a militarization,
expressed in a term such as "blog swarm", defined by Christian
rightwing blogger Hugh Hewitt as "an early indicator of an opinion
storm brewing, which, when it breaks, will fundamentally alter the
general public's understanding of a person, place, product, or
phenomenon."[48] It is communality of bias, or let's say conviction,
that drives the growth of blogging power and its visibility in other
media.

Can we talk of a "fear of media freedom"? It is too easy to say that
there is freedom of speech and that blogs materialize this right. The
aim of radical freedom, one could argue, is to create autonomy and
overcome the dominance of media corporations and state control and to
no longer be bothered by "their" channels. Most blogs show an opposite
tendency. The obsession with news factoids borders to the extreme.
Instead of selective appropriation, there is over-identification and
straight out addiction, in particular to the speed of real-time
reporting. Like Erich Fromm (author of Fear of Freedom), we could read
this as "a psychological problem" because existing information is
simply reproduced and in a public act of internalization. Lists of
books that still have to be read, a common feature on blogs, lead in
the same direction.

According to Erich Fromm, freedom has put us in an unbearable
isolation. We thus feel anxious and powerless. Either we escape into
new dependencies or realize a positive freedom that is based upon "the
uniqueness and individuality of man".[49] "The right to express our
thoughts means something only if we are able to have thoughts of our
own."[50] The freedom from traditional media monopolies leads to new
bondages, in this case to the blog paradigm, where there is little
emphasis on positive freedom, on what to with the overwhelming
functionality and the void of the empty, white entry window. We do not
hear enough about the tension between the individual self and the
"community", "swarms", and "mobs" that are supposed to be part of
the
online environment. What we instead see happening on the software side
are daily improvements of ever more sophisticated (quantitive)
measuring and manipulation tools (in terms of inbound linking, traffic,
climbing higher on the Google ladder, etc.). Isn't the document that
stands out the one that is not embedded in existing contexts? Doesn't
the truthness lie in the unlinkable?

--

[1] For regular updates on this figure, go to www.blogherald.com. All
researchers involved in blog counting admit how arbitrary and
unreliable the available statistics are as closed and abandoned blogs
are not taken into account. Nonetheless, the tendency is clear and
undisputed.
[2] See www.marketingterms.com/dictionary/blog/
[3] Taken from Wikipedia's blog definition (accessed 21 December 2005).
[4] Blogs!, 130.
[5] "Ten Tips for Writing a Blog Post", posted at problogger.net, 30
December 2005.
www.problogger.net/archives/2005/12/30/tens-tips-for-writing-a-blog-
post/
[6] See Rebecca Blood's history of blogs, written in September 2000:
www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html
[7] Jean Baudrillard, The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact,
Oxford/New York, 2005, 25.
[8] Adilkno, Media Archive, Brooklyn, Autonomedia, 1998. URL:
http://thing.desk.nl/bilwet/adilkno/TheMediaArchive/04.txt. "Vague
media do not respond to success. They do not achieve their goals. Their
models are not argumentative, but contaminative. Once you tune into
them, you get the attitude."
[9] Ed Phillips from San Francisco reports that "unit testing is now de
riguer in the software world and just as it would be hard to imagine a
major software effort without unit testing, it is now hard to imagine
big media without the blogosphere." (email, 27 March 2006).
[10] Nick Gall: "A lot of the media are thinking about blogs as a new
form of publishing but it's really a new form of conversation and a new
form of community." In: David Kline, Dan Burstein, Blog!, New York: CDS
Books 2005, 150.
[11] Source: Telepolis, 27 December 2005. Wolf-Dieter Roth, "Mein blog
liest ja sowieso kein Schwein".
www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/21/21643/1.html.
[12] Glenn Reynolds, An Army of Davids, How Markets and Technology
Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other
Goliaths, Nashville: Nelson Current 2006.
[13] Greg Sherwin and Emily Avila in their Clickz column, 12 January
2001. www.clickz.com/experts/archives/ebiz/ecom_comm/article.php/835141
[14] Taken from the Foucault Dictionary Project:
http://users.california.com/~rathbone/foucau10.htm
[15] www.cynical-c.com/
[16] www.poconorecord.com/2001/local/exd81858.htm
[17] Interview with Jean Baudrillard by Deborah Solomon, 20 November
2005, New York, Times Magazine.
[18] Paulo Virno, A Grammar of the Multitude, Semiotext(e), Cambridge,
Massachusetts: MIT Press 2004, 86-88.
[19] As Terry Eagleton writes: "Hermeneutics, as the art of deciphering
language, taught us to be suspicious of the glaringly self-evident."
(After Theory, New York: Basic Books 2003, 53) This is precisely what
bloggers do.
[20] Peter Sloterdijk, Critique of Cynical Reason, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 1987, 5.
[21] See Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, "In Search of Lost Cheekiness, An
Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk's Critique of Cynical Reason", in:
Tabula Rasa, 20 (2003). www.tabvlarasa.de/20/sorgner.php
[22] Justin Clemens, 93.
[23] Clemens, 88.
[24] Interview with Andre Gluckmann, in: Frankfurter Rundschau, 11
November 2005.
www.fr-aktuell.de/ressorts/kultur_und_medien/feuilleton/?cnt=754264
[25] Justin Cremers, The Romanticism of Contemporary Theory, Ashgate,
Hants, 2003, 77.
[26] Clemens, 89.
[27] Ibid.
[28] Karen Carr, 3.
[29] Carr, 7.
[30] Kline, Burstein, xxv.
[31] A typical blogs as agenda-setting theory would be Aaron Delwiche's
"Agenda-setting, opinion leadership and the World of Blogs", in: First
Monday, 10/12.
www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_12/delwiche/index.html. See also the
work of Kaye Trammell: http://kaye.trammell.com/
[32] Kline, Burstein, 249.
[33] See Terje Rasmussen's paper "Media of the Self".
www.media.uio.no/personer/terjer/
[34] See: Dominic Pettman, After the Orgy, Toward a Politics of
Exhaustion, Albany: State University of New York Press 2002.
[35] Caire E. Write, "The Author's Dilemma: To Blog or Not to Blog",
in: The Internet Writing Journal, November 2005. URL:
www.internetwritingjournal.com/nov05/cew4.htm
[36] Summary of David Weinberger's lecture "The Shape of Knowledge",
Helsinki School of Economics, 1 December 2005.
[37] See: www.fuckedcompany.com
[38] The chapter mirrors a chapter with the same name, "Nihilism in
Black America", in Cornel West's Race Matters (Boston: Beacon Press
1993, 11-20).
[39] Cornel West, 39.
[40] Alex Halavias, Blogs and Archiving. 16 September 2004.
http://alex.halavais.net/?p=825
[41] Of course there are blogs dedicated to MMORPGs (such as "embedded
journalist" Wagner James Au, whose New World Notes blog reports about
the Second Life game. http://secondlife.blogs.com/), but that's not the
point. A MMORPG that feeds off the daily buzz in the blogosphere would
perhaps be a start? Of course there are blogs dedicated to MMORPGs
(such as "embedded journalist" Wagner James Au, whose New World Notes
blog reports about the Second Life game. http://secondlife.blogs.com/),
but that's not the point. A MMORPG that feeds off the daily buzz in the
blogosphere would perhaps be a start?
[42] Phil Windley blogging Matthew Berk's presentation at the 10 June
2003 Jupitermedia ClickZ Weblog Business Strategies Conference.
www.windley.com/archives/2003/06/10.shtml
[43] www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php
[44] Nicholas Carr, "The New Narcissism", Rough Type, 17 February 2006.
www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/02/the_new_narciss.php
[45] AlwaysOn Summit, 20 July 2005.
www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=12328_0_1_0_C
[46] Friedrich Kittler, "What's New about the New Media?" in: Rem
Koolhaas et al., Mutations, Barcelona 2000, 64-65.
[47]
http://weblog.burningbird.net/archives/2004/02/11/community-member-or-
writer
[48] Hewett, 1.
[49] Erich Fromm, The Fear of Freedom, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
1942, x.
[50] Fromm, 207.
_______________________
[n] come cancellarsi
https://www5.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/newbrainframes
[n] archivi dei messaggi
http://lists.autistici.org/list/newbrainframes.html

Reply via email to