Ok, I found the bug.
I'll compile a beta3-1 for the client.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

table rotation is good. Originally I pondered about an archive mode. I.e. a
periodical "insert into log_archive" done by the newpki_daemon, e.g. every 2
days, and "log_archive" as a parallel table to "logs". Then "log_archive" is
under disposition to the user to delete from. Eventually when table
"logs_archive" is not present, because dropped, no "insert into log_archive"
takes place. In the inspection screen there could be a switch "logs" or
"logs_archive".

-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Fr�d�ric Giudicelli
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2004 12:50
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: server-2.0.0-beta3 / problem in logging


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



status today (5 days newpki server running)

select count(*) from newpki_server.logs ..  > 90.000 records
select count(*) from REP_alpha.logs .. > 200.000 records


Well... mysql is supposed to handle up to 4 billions entries... :)
But this will certainly become a problem at some point. Maybe I could do
some table rotation, like every month rename "logs" and "logs_hash",
recreate it empty, and save up to 4 months worth of logs.

--
Fr�d�ric Giudicelli
http://www.newpki.org
_____________________________________________________________________
NewPKI                                          http://www.newpki.org
User Support Mailing List                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_____________________________________________________________________
NewPKI                                          http://www.newpki.org
User Support Mailing List                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Fr�d�ric Giudicelli http://www.newpki.org _____________________________________________________________________ NewPKI http://www.newpki.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to