http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010709-166034,00.ht
ml

   TIME Magazine    JULY 9, 2001 VOL. 158 NO. 1

   WORLD

   Milosevic In The Dock: At What Price?
   BY CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

   military
   MIKE NELSON/AFP

   ENFORCERS: U.S. power is what caused the dictator's downfall

   The deportation of Slobodan Milosevic to the international Criminal
   Tribunal in the Hague last week was hailed as a triumph for the rule
   of law. "A momentous event for international justice," said David
   Scheffer, former U.S. ambassador-at-large for war-crimes issues. "An
   affirmation of the importance of international justice," opined the
   New York Times.

   It is nothing of the sort. Milosevic's deportation is testimony not
to
   the power of international law but to the power of the U.S. The
   indictment that the Hague tribunal issued two years ago would be a
   dead letter today--and "international justice" an empty phrase--were
   it not for American power. It was the NATO bombing of
   Kosovo--overwhelmingly American--that expelled Serb forces,
devastated
   Serbia and utterly discredited Milosevic.

   And beyond military power there was raw economic power, dispensed
   twice. Milosevic was arrested by the new government on April 1. Why
   then? Because the U.S. Congress had stipulated that unless Serbia
   showed cooperation on trying Milosevic by that date, the U.S. would
   withhold $50 million in reconstruction aid. And then, just last week,

   Milosevic was spirited out of the country. Why precisely on June 28?
   Because on the very next day, a donors' conference of Western nations

   would be meeting to consider the Serbs' request for $1.25 billion in
   reconstruction aid. They knew they wouldn't get it--the U.S. was not
   even prepared to send a delegation--until it was clear that Milosevic

   would be deported. Money talks.

   Moreover, Milosevic fell from power following his unexpected loss in
   elections. How did that happen? The U.S. poured millions of dollars
   into the democratic opposition. In an election run by a dictatorship
   controlling everything from the media to the ballot boxes, that aid
   was indispensable for creating a level playing field, and thus
   permitting the popular desire to be rid of Milosevic to find real
   political expression.

   These are the forces that brought Milosevic to justice. His
   deportation has nothing to do with any new authority wielded by the
   Hague court or any sudden eruption of allegiance by the leaders of
   Serbia (or any other country, for that matter) to the shibboleth of
   "international legality."

   The writ of the international tribunal does not extend beyond the
   sidewalk outside its chambers. Like many other international
   institutions, from the IMF to NATO, the tribunal is a subsidiary of
   Pax Americana. These institutions are granted more or less formal
   independence, but absent the U.S., they are powerless.

   True, the American writ does not extend everywhere. The dictators of
   Iraq, Burma and North Korea, for example, are beyond its reach. But
   within the Western sphere, surely, there is no hiding from American
   power. Those who run afoul of it are not imprisoned on Elba or St.
   Helena; they are jailed in Miami (Manuel Noriega) or in more
   cosmopolitan quarters in the Netherlands.

   Such raw power, however, must be exercised with great care. The U.S.
   may in time come to regret bringing Milosevic as a trophy to the
   Hague. Why? Because America's main interest in the Balkans is a
   democratic and stable Serbia, which in turn is the key to a
democratic
   and stable Balkans. And Milosevic's deportation threatens to
   destabilize Serbia just as it begins its transition to democracy. The

   Yugoslav Prime Minister has already resigned (declaring "Yugoslavia
is
   at the beginning of a crisis") and the government fallen.

   Even those who are not Milosevic supporters resent seeing the former
   leader of their country, uniquely, put in the dock when so many other

   tyrants, from Fidel Castro to the late Franjo Tudjman of Croatia,
have
   walked free. Vojislav Kostunica, the democratically elected President

   of Yugoslavia and hero of the people-power revolution that overthrew
   Milosevic, bitterly opposed sending him to a tribunal he regards as
   biased against Serbia. He called the deportation illegal and
   unconstitutional. It was. When the Serbian legislature, preferring
   that Milosevic be tried at home, declined to extradite him, the
   Serbian government ordered him extradited by decree. When the
   constitutional court put that decree on hold, the Serbian government
   simply ignored and overrode the court.

   Kostunica charged that such methods are taken right out of "the
   arsenal of Milosevic's politics." These are hardly healthy precedents

   for a country trying to put down constitutional roots.

   I too would rejoice to see Milosevic pay for his crimes. But what
   price justice? Judges may never ask themselves that question.
   Statesmen must always. And it is statesmen, specifically American
   statesmen wielding American power, who made the fateful calls that
   sealed Milosevic's future and may now be risking Serbia's.

   END

   Copyright C 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
   Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

   

                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to