in short:

1) "....the model of thought that says we need to go out and extend
unemployment benefits and health insurance benefits and so forth is not
I think one that is commensurate with the American spirit here," said
Representative Dick Armey of Texas, the majority leader

2) On Friday, Congress approved the bailout for the airline industry to
help it recover. The bill included a provision allowing airline
executives to keep collecting their large salaries, 

3) This week, American announced it would not pay severance to the
20,000 workers it planned to let go.  




NY Times Sept. 26, 2001

              Unions at Airlines Assail Management for Denying Benefits

              By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

Labor-management relations in the airline industry, rocky before Sept. 
11, have grown rancorous, with unions enraged at what they say are 
moves by several carriers to use the national emergency to deny pay or 
benefits to workers idled as air travel stalls.  

American Airlines, a unit of the AMR Corporation, said yesterday that 
the airline's finances had been hurt so badly by the terrorist attacks
that 
it could not afford to pay severance benefits to the thousands of
workers 
that it planned to lay off.  

Union officials quickly criticized American, asserting that the least
the 
airline could do after Congress approved a multibillion-dollar bailout
was 
to make good on its commitments to its workers.  

"It's outrageous that American would ask the workers to support them 
on getting this massive federal bailout and then turn around to slap the

workers in the face by failing to honor its commitments," said Edward 
Wytkind, executive director of the transportation trades department of 
the A.F.L.-C.I.O.  

Karen Watson, an American spokeswoman, insisted that the company 
was honoring its contract and was merely invoking an emergency 
clause that she said allowed the company to suspend certain 
commitments under extreme circumstances.  

"The reason for using these provisions is because of the dire financial 
condition of the industry," Ms. Watson said. "We're furloughing 20,000 
employees because of the 20 percent reduction in our flight schedule, 
which of course occurred suddenly. Right now the issue is the survival 
of the company."  

Several union officials and airline workers, meanwhile, said that United

Airlines, owned by the UAL Corporation, was leaving some workers in 
limbo by not calling them to work but not laying them off, either. US 
Airways, they added, was citing emergency conditions to override a no-
furlough clause in certain union contracts.  

Since the terror attacks, which briefly grounded all aircraft and have
left 
airlines running reduced schedules of half-empty flights, the carriers 
have announced plans to eliminate nearly 80,000 jobs. Delta Air Lines 
has scheduled a news conference for today and it is expected to 
announce more than 10,000 layoffs.  

At American, Ms. Watson, the spokeswoman, declined to say how 
much the airline would save by not making its severance payments; 
union officials estimated that tens of millions of dollars would be
saved. 
The laid-off workers generally will qualify for unemployment insurance. 
American's plan to withhold severance benefits was first reported 
yesterday by The Los Angeles Times.  

Some union officials said that they would ask Congress to enact a law 
requiring American to make good on its severance commitments as a 
condition for receiving its part of the $15 billion in cash and loan 
guarantees approved by Congress and signed by President Bush last 
week.  

Dissatisfied that the bailout bill did not provide any protections for
airline 
workers, union officials also want Congress to enact an additional 52 
weeks of unemployment insurance for laid-off aviation workers, above 
and beyond the 26 weeks that is typically provided. And they want 
Congress to guarantee at least 12 months of federally financed health 
insurance for all laid-off aviation workers.  

On Monday, Donald J. Carty, American's chief executive, said that he 
would take no pay for the rest of the year and urged American 
employees to agree to voluntary cuts in pay.  

Last year, according to the airline's proxy statement, Mr. Carty earned 
$772,500 in salary plus a bonus of $1,351,875.  

Union officials complained that United was invoking an emergency 
clause, known as force majeure, for the month of October, citing it in 
telling many employees that they would have no work and no pay for at 
least several weeks next month, although those workers would not be 
officially laid off.  

While unhappy with this development, union officials voiced less anger 
at United's approach than American's, because they said United 
apparently was trying to weather October with as few long-term layoffs 
as possible.  

Chris Brathwaite, a United spokesman, declined to discuss details of 
the airline's job reductions.  

Pat Friend, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, said US 
Airways had invoked an emergency clause to skirt no-furlough 
provisions in the contract.  

US Airways executives acknowledged that they were relying on the 
emergency clause. However, US Airways, which has announced plans 
to eliminate 11,000 jobs, said it would make good on its severance 
obligations .  

In a statement issued Monday, US Airways said, "The terrorist attacks 
of Sept. 11 have had a catastrophic effect on the airline industry, and 
US Airways now finds itself in the position of having to struggle for
its 
very survival."  

              Number of Workers Out of a Job Is Continually Rising

              By TERRY PRISTIN and LESLIE EATON

More than 100,000 New York City workers are likely to find themselves 
unemployed, at least temporarily, as a result of the World Trade Center 
disaster, according to government estimates released yesterday.  

Already, 10,800 people who have asked the New York State 
Department of Labor for unemployment assistance have attributed their 
situation to the terrorist attack on the twin towers and its fallout 
throughout the economy.  

Some of the people who are out of a job - janitors, hotel cashiers, 
store clerks - worked in or near the towers. Many more - waiters, 
limousine drivers, flight attendants - worked far from ground zero but 
are economic victims of the aftershocks like the steep drop in tourism.


And the fate of many in other occupations - printing, securities, the 
garment industry - will depend on the stock market and on how 
quickly the city's economy rebounds, economists and labor analysts 
said.  

Even before the disaster, the city's economy, once red-hot, had cooled 
significantly. In August, New York City companies employed 8,200 
fewer people than in July, according to the city comptroller's office, 
which said it was the steepest monthly decline in five years. The 
unemployment rate jumped to 5.8 percent in August; it was 5.0 percent 
the month before.  

"In all likelihood, the city was showing signs of recession before this 
happened," said Barbara Byrne Denham, a private economist.  

But the disaster will add significantly to the ranks of the unemployed. 
About 75,000 people who worked in the city are likely to apply for 
unemployment insurance because of the disaster, Emily S. De Rocco, 
an assistant secretary of labor, said yesterday at a news conference in 
Washington.  

An additional 37,500 are expected to receive special unemployment 
benefits under the Disaster Unemployment Assistance program that will 
be available to those who worked in the five boroughs of New York City 
and are not eligible for regular unemployment insurance payments.  

In total, about 700,000 of the almost four million jobs in the city have

been affected in some way by the devastation at ground zero, said 
Stuart Roy, a Department of Labor spokesman.  

Not only have many people lost their jobs, but companies that continue 
to operate have also lost everything from phone service to a week's 
revenues. People who are paid on commission lost income, while some 
people simply could not get to work because of transportation problems. 
 

The new unemployment figures are based on estimates from the New 
York State Department of Labor, which tried to forecast how much 
federal aid the city might need. The state's unemployment insurance 
fund has more than a billion dollars in it, and it can draw upon federal

help should that become necessary, Mr. Roy said.  

People who qualify for unemployment insurance are eligible for as much 
as $405 a week for up to six months. Those who are not eligible for 
unemployment insurance - because, for example, they are self- 
employed - can apply for the disaster unemployment assistance 
program, which provides the same amount of money. A family in which 
the breadwinner has died because of the disaster may also be eligible; 
all benefits are awarded on a case-by- case basis.  

Of course, some workers will find themselves in demand in the coming 
months. Construction workers, for example, are very likely to be in
short 
supply. Demand for security guards also appears to be rising.  

But many New Yorkers worked at places that no longer exist, in jobs 
that no longer exist.  

Among them are 2,000 janitors, security guards, porters and window 
cleaners who worked in the World Trade Center or in surrounding 
buildings that were destroyed or shut down. Of these, 350 were on duty 
during the attack, and 26 died.  

Their union said many of these survivors may be able to find work 
eventually. Last week, the union, the Building Service Workers Local 
32BJ, reached an agreement that requires contractors to give these 
workers first choice when new jobs become open.  

"There's a strong possibility of absorbing all of these people in the
next 
few months," said Bill Meyerson, a union spokesman.  

Worse off, perhaps, were about 1,000 people who worked in the four 
hotels in and around ground zero. Their prospects of finding new jobs 
are dim, because even before the attack, the hotel business was 
already reeling from a decline in business travel.  

Since Sept. 11, of course, tourism has taken a nose dive. About 600 
members of Local 6 of the Hotel and Restaurant Workers were laid off 
before the attacks, and 1,200 more have been let go since, said John 
Turchiano, a union spokesman.  

Until Sept. 11, Daniel Mensah, 35, was holding down two jobs and 
sending money home to Ghana for his wife and three children. At night, 
he waxed and stripped floors and shampooed carpets at the Millennium 
Hilton, next to the trade center. During the day, he mopped and swept 
at the Muse Hotel in Midtown.  

Last week, he said, Muse employees were warned to expect layoffs, 
prompting Mr. Mensah's wife to urge him to move to another state. But 
he said he chose to stay and take his chances. "My feeling for New 
York is too great," he said.  

Expecting a long dry spell, the union local and the Hotel Trades Council

have set aside $2 million in relief for the displaced workers and have 
assured workers that they will get medical coverage for a year. And the 
hotels have pledged to spend $5 million to help workers laid off.  

Restaurants that rely heavily on tourists or are in or near the
financial 
district, beyond the reach of taxis and private cars, are also cutting 
back on staff. At City Hall, the name of a three-year-old restaurant on 
Duane Street, Henry Archer Meer, the chef and owner, said he had 
reduced his staff of 115 employees by 25, and was doing without 15 of 
his 22 waiters by operating one shift instead of two.  

The tourism drought has also hurt companies that transport people to 
airports. "The day they destroyed the World Trade Center, they 
destroyed our business," said Steven P. Ellis, the sales director of XYZ

2- Way Radio Service, a car service based in Park Slope, Brooklyn.  

XYZ drivers are independent contractors, who own their Lincoln Town 
Cars. Mr. Ellis said at least 25 of the 425 drivers had decided to
search 
for other work.  

But they are lucky compared to people like Inocencio Tecalero, 18, who 
worked as a deliveryman for Candy's, a restaurant in the financial 
district that will be closed for months. Mr. Tecalero, who earned $8 a 
hour, is the sole support of his seven brothers and sisters in Mexico.  

              Some Families Doubt Sincerity of Cantor

              By DIANA B. HENRIQUES

Maybe it was the finality of it. On Sept. 15, the bond trading firm of 
Cantor Fitzgerald dropped its missing employees from the payroll.  

Whether that was prudent or crass depends in large part on one's view 
of Howard W. Lutnick, the chairman of the firm, which lost almost 70 
percent of its New York staff in the attacks on the World Trade Center.


At first, Mr. Lutnick's gritty reputation was largely obscured by the
halo 
effect of his tearful public pledge to keep the devastated firm alive so

that it could care for more than 600 families bereft by the disaster.  

Now, Cantor families are starting to match those televised promises 
against the details of the firm's benefits and are smudging Mr.
Lutnick's 
new image with rancor and suspicion. In e-mail messages and 
telephone calls, some angry relatives - in some cases, the survivors of 
already disgruntled employees - are saying that Cantor's actions do 
not match its chairman's words.  

Asked about these complaints this week, a company spokesman said 
that some relatives were simply mistaken about the benefits, or have 
not given the firm time to keep its vows. Several of Mr. Lutnick's 
supporters note privately that his highly visible grief - though it may 
have angered some mourning relatives - has enabled him to advance 
the relief effort, as when he persuaded the American Red Cross to make 
grants this week to all surviving families to help meet their living 
expenses.  

But Cantor does not dispute the most frequently heard complaint: that 
the company dropped the missing employees from its payroll on Sept. 
15. True, the employees are no longer working. But some firms that lost 
people in the disaster are keeping the missing employees on the payroll 
until families have some other safety net in place. Some unhappy 
Cantor families have argued that they expected similar treatment, in 
light of Mr. Lutnick's public professions of concern.  

"This was the most difficult by far of all the business decisions" the
firm 
has made since the attacks, the spokesman said. "But to have done 
otherwise would make it harder to restore the business that is so 
important to the long-term welfare of these families."  

Many relatives who were contacted the last week expressed general 
satisfaction with Cantor's benefits program. But more than a half-dozen 
calls and e-mail messages expressed shock that there was no 
paycheck last week, since most of the Cantor employees are officially 
still "missing," not dead.  

The company says its insurance carrier is expediting payments under 
the $100,000 life insurance policy on each employee, without requiring a

formal death certificate.  

Typically, though, the largest portion of any Wall Street family's
income 
is the year-end bonus, the size of which varies with the firm's
profitability 
and each employee's performance and contribution. Several of Mr. 
Lutnick's critics have expressed confusion and concern about how 
bonuses will be distributed.  

They say they have been told that the records necessary for calculating 
employee bonuses were lost in the destruction of the firm's office, and 
they doubt the lost employees will ultimately get them.  

"I hope to God I'm wrong, but there's no guarantee," said the brother of
a 
missing trader, who said he feared retribution against his sister-in-law
if 
his name were used. "What if it's just a public relations gambit?"  

Wall Street bonuses are typically paid in December. Cantor's Web site, 
www.cantorusa.com, reports that the firm intends to pay bonuses to the 
families of lost employees and hopes to make such payments before 
Jan. 1. While some documents were destroyed, the spokesman said, 
"given the relatively small size of the firm, it should not be difficult
to 
reconstruct records to permit the payment of bonuses at the end of the 
year, as planned."  

Other callers have complained that the company has, or soon will, cut 
off health insurance for the families of lost workers. The company Web 
site reports that Cantor will maintain fully paid health insurance for
all 
surviving families for 12 months, and the spokesman confirmed that 
information.  

Finally, relatives of some missing Cantor partners are concerned about 
money that the partners had been required to reinvest in the
partnership. 
Cantor must establish the value at which it will redeem those 
partnership interests, and some relatives fear that value will be
unfairly 
low, even allowing for the damage the partnership has sustained.  

A company spokesman declined to discuss private partnership matters, 
and the Web site does not address the issue.  

Cantor has reported that its partners had voted to allocate 25 percent
of 
any year-end profits to the families of its lost employees, including
Mr. 
Lutnick's younger brother, Gary. But this promise, too, is viewed with 
some skepticism. As a missing employee's sister complained, the firm 
is not legally obliged to keep it.  

Some grief counselors suggested that the criticisms may partly reflect 
the understandable anger of relatives whose personal bereavement has 
been overwhelmed by a disaster whose scale prevents a company from 
responding as it might in more normal times.  

But Mr. Lutnick carries some baggage, too. A prot�g� of Cantor's 
founder, B. Gerald Cantor, Mr. Lutnick once said he had gained his 
mentor's confidence in part by telling Mr. Cantor things that other 
executives were not telling him - a practice that did not endear him to 
many executives.  

When Mr. Cantor fell mortally ill in 1996, Mr. Lutnick moved quickly to 
take control of the firm and managed to inflame his mentor's wife, Iris,
in 
the process. An ugly courtroom battle wrapped Mr. Lutnick's image in 
razor wire for months, and a few brushes with market regulators did 
nothing to blunt those sharp edges.  

Since the fight with Mrs. Cantor, some former employees say, the firm 
has continued to pursue employment or business disputes aggressively 
in court, generating some ill will among former executives.  

Despite this history, many Cantor families see Mr. Lutnick in a brighter

light, praising his candid concern for them and trusting his promises.  

The father-in-law of Montgomery Hord of Pelham, N.Y., a missing 
partner, said he understood that the firm "had to quickly retain some 
people to act when they still don't have all the answers." He added, "On

a scale of one to 10, I put them in the upper registers."  

Patrick McCarthy, a lawyer whose brother Robert perished, agreed. 
"Cantor has been great so far," Mr. McCarthy said. He said he 
understood the firm's decision to suspend the paychecks of missing 
workers.  

"When the accountants come in, what can they say?"  

              House Republican Leaders Balk at Any
              Help for Laid-Off Workers

              By LIZETTE ALVAREZ

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 - House Republican leaders balked today at 
the idea of helping thousands of laid-off workers by extending 
unemployment compensation and health care benefits despite a 
commitment last Friday by Speaker J. Dennis Hastert to consider such 
legislation.  

"The model of thought there, and quite frankly, the model of thought
that 
says we need to go out and extend unemployment benefits and health 
insurance benefits and so forth is not I think one that is commensurate 
with the American spirit here," said Representative Dick Armey of 
Texas, the majority leader. He said a higher priority was to pass an 
economic stimulus bill.  

Representative Tom DeLay, the majority whip from Texas, seemed no 
more enthusiastic about the Democratic plan, which was first proposed 
last Friday when Congress approved the $15 billion airline industry 
bailout. The idea was rejected by Republicans in a late-night
negotiation 
session.  

"Sometimes people jump out too quickly on an issue," Mr. DeLay said, 
referring to Democrats. "They want to develop an issue."  

The idea of unemployment help has generated more interest from the 
White House, at least for now. President Bush plans to travel to 
Chicago on Thursday to thank airline workers, and some are hoping he 
will offer them some sort of assistance. At a breakfast meeting today, 
Democratic leaders said Mr. Bush told them he had directed the 
Department of Labor to review the administration's options.  

"He acknowledged this was a problem," said Representative Richard A. 
Gephardt, the Democratic leader, who today introduced one of several 
bills to help laid-off workers.  

John Feehery, Mr. Hastert's spokesman, reiterated that the speaker 
planned to keep his commitment to Democrats and "move forward on 
this in a bipartisan way." But, he added: "I'm not sure where it's going
to 
go. I don't think a decision has been made."  

As for the reluctance among some Republican leaders to move a 
workers' bill, Mr. Gephardt said they would face the same pressures as 
Democrats when laid-off employees ask them, "What about us?"  

"I'm not sure in the end they won't have to move something," he said.  

Immediately after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the government ordered

all airplanes grounded, a decision that left the airline industry in
financial 
disarray. Since then, the airlines and aerospace companies have said 
they will lay off more than 100,000 workers. Ronald Reagan National 
Airport, adjacent to Washington, has been shuttered since the attack, 
putting thousands of airport workers there in limbo.  

On Friday, Congress approved the bailout for the airline industry to
help 
it recover. The bill included a provision allowing airline executives to

keep collecting their large salaries, which angered Democrats. On 
Monday, the chairman of American Airlines, Donald J. Carty, said he 
would forgo his salary for the rest of the year and asked other 
executives and nonunion workers to volunteer to take pay cuts. This 
week, American announced it would not pay severance to the 20,000 
workers it planned to let go.  

Democrats were infuriated when Republicans refused to include a bill to 
help workers as part of the initial bailout bill, and criticized their
own 
leaders for agreeing to move the legislation to the floor without an 
employee assistance measure.  

A number of them were assuaged by a commitment made by Mr. 
Hastert that Congress would consider proposals addressing the issue. 
But many remained distrustful of the promise, and they now feel as if 
their suspicions were warranted.  

"That's why we wanted to do it last week," said Representative George 
Miller of California, the senior Democrat on the House Education and 
the Work Force Committee, who opposed the bailout bill. "Of course, 
we got rolled. Once you give away what they want, why should they give 
you what you want."  

"Our leadership needs to play tougher next time," Mr. Miller added.  

Hoping to put pressure on Republicans, both Mr. Gephardt and Mr. 
Daschle said they planned to attach a workers' aid bill to legislation
on 
aviation security. Mr. Daschle, as majority leader of the Senate, could 
do that easily. The idea, though, is opposed by Senate Republican 
leaders, who say it will only complicate passage of a bill that will
make 
Americans feel safer on airplanes.  

"We have indicated to the White House and to our Republican 
colleagues that it would be very difficult for us to pass the airline 
security bill without attaching some legislation that allows us to
address 
the myriad of problems we're facing with unemployed workers," Mr. 
Daschle said. "We addressed airline problems last week. We've got to 
address employee problems very soon."  

              In Denver, Airline Jobs Continue to Dwindle

              By MICHAEL JANOFSKY

DENVER, Sept. 25 - When the planes crashed into the World Trade 
Center and the Pentagon, Ken Pabst was on vacation from his job as a 
reservation agent for Continental Airlines (news/quote). He and the
other 
members of his bluegrass band, High Plains Tradition, were at a music 
festival in Winfield, Kan.  

"I knew it would change the airline industry forever," Mr. Pabst said.  

His premonition has proved agonizingly correct for more than 80,000 
employees of the nation's airlines. Their companies, responding to a 
decreasing demand for air travel, have cut the number of flights and
have 
laid off employees. Even as Congress has agreed to a $15 billion bailout

of the industry, leading carriers like American and United have each 
announced that 20,000 employees would be laid off.  

Continental, the nation's fifth-largest carrier, said last week that it
would 
cut 12,000 jobs, a number that included Mr. Pabst and the 949 other 
people who worked at the airline's reservation center at what used to be

Stapleton Airport in Denver. The workers were told Thursday that the 
center was closing immediately and that they would have the option of 
accepting a yearlong leave of absence, retiring early or moving to
cities 
where Continental has other reservation centers - Houston, Salt Lake 
City or Tampa, Fla.  

For many of the Continental employees who came to work that day 
anticipating a routine morning, it was anything but. Many workers left
in 
tears. "People were lost, thinking, `Here we go again,' " said Dottie 
Bakke, a former reservation agent who recalled Continental's bankruptcy 
filing in 1983.  

"People had to go out on the street and look for jobs again," said Ms. 
Bakke, who worked for Continental from 1968 through 1989 and throws 
an annual summer party for her former colleagues.  

To Mr. Pabst, who joined the airline 11 years ago as a ramp agent, it 
was another sign of Continental's slow but steady disappearance from a 
market it once considered a hub. In the late 1980's, more than 250 
flights came and left Stapleton, which closed in 1995 when Denver 
International Airport opened. On the day before the attacks, 24 flights 
flew in and out of Denver International. On the day before the layoffs 
were announced, the number was 13.  

Like many of Continental's former employees in Denver, as well as 
recently laid-off airline employees elsewhere, Mr. Pabst, who is 48,
said 
he was a little bewildered. He is a Denver native, now living in Aurora,
a 
suburb, who loves the area and never contemplated leaving. Now, he 
said, he is not sure what he, his wife and two daughters will do.  

"My wife has a good job as a mortgage banker, and she's been pretty 
busy with lots of people refinancing now," he said. "She works for a 
company that has offices in Tampa, Cleveland and Salt Lake City, 
which are other Continental hubs. So I'm thinking about taking the leave

of absence, and we'll look into those three cities to see if there's a
fit for 
us."  

As for Continental, the closing of the reservation center will leave 330

jobs in the Denver area, and a company spokesman, Rahsaan Johnson, 
said that if more flights are eliminated, more jobs will be lost.  

The only real winner may be the city of Denver, which is turning the old

airport into a neighborhood of homes, shops and parks. Continental's 
reservation center was on the second floor of an old hangar.  

The airline's lease was scheduled to expire in 2003. Now empty, the 
hangar could be razed soon.  

"Because this was caused by such a disaster, everybody's broken- 
hearted," Ms. Bakke said. "It's been a real shock and very, very sad."  

              Antiunion Measure Passes in Oklahoma

OKLAHOMA CITY, Sept. 25 (AP) - Oklahoma voters today approved a 
measure that makes the state the 22nd to ban labor contracts requiring 
workers to pay union dues.  

With 98 percent of the vote counted, the measure was ahead with 
support from 54 percent of the voters.  

"I am excited for Oklahoma," said Gov. Frank Keating, a Republican 
who supported the measure. "This is the first step in the liberation of 
Oklahoma's economy."  

Jimmy Curry, head of the Oklahoma A.F.L.-C.I.O. and an opponent of 
the measure, said the labor movement would "back up and regroup."  

The vote came after the most expensive election campaign in state 
history, pitting business and labor interests in a rematch of a battle
37 
years ago over the issue. Unions won the battle in 1964 by fewer than 
25,000 votes. Until today, no state had passed such a measure since 
1986.  

Supporters argued that Oklahoma was losing jobs because companies 
shied from states without such laws, and that workers should be 
allowed to choose whether they wanted to support a union.  

Opponents said requiring all workers to pay dues was fair because 
federal law mandates that unions represent all workers in a union shop, 
including nonmembers.  

Less than 9 percent of Oklahoma workers are in jobs covered by union 
contracts.  

              Nation's Deepest Coal Mine Now Ranks Among Deadliest

              By DAVID FIRESTONE

BROOKWOOD, Ala., Sept. 25 - The low-sulfur coal coveted by power 
plants exists in abundance beneath the green ridges near this central 
Alabama town, but to get it, miners must take the longest elevator ride 
in the country to a dark and risky office: 175 stories straight down,
past 
cracks and crevices packed with highly volatile methane gas.  

For all the elaborate wind tunnels and gas-collection systems that have 
been pioneered here, a spark and a cave-in in the wrong place can 
create a fireball of enormous intensity. Alabama miners have long 
known that their jobs here were considered more dangerous than similar 
jobs elsewhere in the country, and 13 of their families learned
painfully 
on Sunday the precise nature of the peril underground.  

When the roof fell near a battery charger in the nation's deepest mine 
that afternoon, the resulting explosion killed three of six nearby
workers 
instantly. The mine's operator, Jim Walter Resources, confirmed today 
that nine other men who ran to their aid were killed a few minutes later

in a subsequent blast, and a thirteenth man who was rescued died of 
his burns on Monday. The accident thus became the nation's deadliest 
mine calamity since 1984.  

Today, federal rescue officials and teams from the mine's operator were 
unable for a second day to get near the section of Blue Creek Mine No. 
5 where the second blast occurred. Fires are believed to be still
blazing 
in the tunnel 2,100 feet below ground, and levels of methane gas were 
too intense for rescuers to approach, said Kyle Parks, a spokesman for 
the company.  

Recovery workers began to flood the affected area with water today to 
extinguish the fires, but it could be weeks or months before production 
resumes and more than 400 workers can again be paid.  

Miners who gathered at the local United Mine Workers union hall today 
know exactly what their colleagues went through, a risk that men in this

area have taken for decades in exchange for good, steady jobs that pay 
around $20 an hour.  

As mining technology has become more advanced and robotic, fewer 
men are needed in the tunnels, but those that remain have learned to 
become very, very careful after they take their four-minute ride to the 
bottom.  

"It's like no other job on earth," said Aaron Bowens, 44, a third-
generation miner who has spent 15 years working beneath Brookwood, 
where he lives. "I've seen miners from other places who have never been 
claustrophobic in their lives walk off the job on their first day when
they 
realize how deep it gets. If you thought about the danger every day, you

just couldn't go to work."  

Federal inspectors are in the mines almost every day, along with state 
officials and union and company safety workers making sure that 
odorless methane gas is diluted with fresh air forced down from above.  

In part because of its great depth, this mine is one of the gassiest in
the 
country, but Jim Walter Resources has become known in the industry 
as a pioneer in extracting the methane - both to be sold as natural 
gas, and to make the coal mining possible.  

"Jim Walter is a first-class outfit that puts a premium on safety and 
getting that methane out of there," said Charles D. Haynes, a former 
miner who now teaches civil and environmental engineering at the 
University of Alabama in nearby Tuscaloosa. "But don't kid yourself - 
it's a very hostile environment for those men."  

This was the first underground fatal accident that has occurred in Mine 
No. 5, though there have been three deaths since 1995 at nearby Mine 
No. 4 - from electrocution, a fall and asphyxiation. In all, the company

had a higher accident rate than the industry as a whole last year, 
according to the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, but the 
state's accident rate has improved from 1996, when Alabama's mine 
accident rate was far higher than the rest of the country.  

That is generally attributed to improved methods for removing the 
methane, which were first developed here. The mine operator spends up 
to a year removing methane before the tunnels are dug, then extracts 
more just ahead of the mining machine and again after the coal has 
been removed. The sale of the methane as natural gas has become a 
substantial part of Jim Walter's revenues.  

But Dr. Haynes said the methane - the natural byproduct of the decay 
of vegetable matter that also produces coal - had been compressed in 
the coal for thousands of years, and was released in large, high-
pressure streams when there were cave-ins. That apparently happened 
on Sunday, through a series of events that began when parts of a roof 
felt near a battery charger, causing sparks that ignited released 
methane.  

Miners, who work in tunnels 20 feet wide by 6 feet tall, say they are
not 
looking forward to resuming work near the accident site. But they know 
they will, because it is their livelihood and their identity.  

"It gets in your blood, and you tell yourself it won't happen to you,"
said 
Sidney Atchison, who is 50 and has been a laborer in the mines for 19 
years. "I mean, it's not the only dangerous job in the world. You can be

sitting in an office in New York, and look what can happen to you."  




                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to