http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml

The Daily Telegraph (London)
May 25, 2002

Prosecutors pay price for Milosevic 'opera'

By Neil Tweedie in The Hague

   The prosecution in the trial of Slobodan Milosevic is facing
accusations that its case, conceived as a "grandiose opera", has been
badly prepared and poorly executed.

   Prosecutors led by the Swiss lawyer Carla Del Ponte have blamed their
decision to ditch scores of witnesses on the decision of the three
judges, led by Britain's Richard May, to give them only 14 months to
present their evidence.  The prosecution team had expected a process
lasting years.

   A source close to the tribunal said:  "It all comes down to Carla Del
Ponte's vision of this trial as some kind of grandiose opera.  They
collected something like 1,200 witness statements and expected the thing
to last five years.

   "And of course the whole thing was rushed - they didn't even issue
the indictments until late last year.  Remember, we're talking about
crimes as far back as 1991."

   Almost half the witnesses due to give evidence on the conflict in
Kosovo, the majority of them victims of Serb atrocities and human rights
violations, have been told that they will not be needed, In addition, a
mass of scientific evidence relating to massacre sites has been
discarded, while cuts are even being made in the number of so-called
insider witnesses, former members of the Milosevic regime willing to
give evidence against their former master.

   Substantial cuts in the number of witnesses due to testify on alleged
crimes during the earlier wars in Croatia and Bosnia are also planned.

   The drastic reductions are said by the prosecution to be due to the
tribunal's requirement that all its evidence should be submitted by next
April.  The Kosovo phase of the trial must be finished by July 26 to
allow the start of the second phase dealing with the wars in Croatia and
Bosnia.

   "It's like trying to fight with one arm tied behind your back," said
Graham Blewitt, spokesman for the prosecutor's office. "We are not happy
about this.  The onus is on us to prove this man's guilt and we need the
time to do it."

   The prosecution attempted to appeal against the time limit, pleading
that it would suffer "irremediable prejudice".  But the application was
turned down by the tribunal appeals chamber, which said it was not
satisfied that such prejudice had occurred.

   Critics of the prosecution argue that it has only itself to blame for
the cuts it is now having to make.  The case against Milosevic, they
say, is chiefly one of command responsibility.

   The prosecution simply has to prove that he ordered criminal acts as
head of state and head of the armed forces, or failed to prevent such
acts when informed of them.  But instead, precious time has been wasted
on detailing crime scenes in Kosovo - evidence that cannot by itself
secure a conviction.

   The prosecution is now left struggling to include as many witnesses
as possible, while Milosevic counters by stretching to the limit the
time given to him for cross-examination.

   His guile appears to have paid off.  The prosecution estimates that
the former president of Yugoslavia commands 60 per cent of the airtime
in court, forcing witnesses to answer mostly irrelevant questions while
using his platform to make speeches to his audience in Belgrade.

   So far, 58 witnesses have testified in the Kosovo phase of the
prosecution, leaving 79 to go before July 26.  But, thanks to
Milosevic's effective delaying tactics, the current turnover of
witnesses is usually three a week.

   That means the court will be lucky to get through 30 witnesses by the
deadline, leaving everyone wondering what will happen to the rest.

-----------------------




                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to