Putin's 'war on terrorism' outmaneuvers the U.S.  
By William Pfaff  
 
Controlling the Caucasus
 
PARIS President Vladimir Putin vows to pursue terrorists even beyond
Russia's borders, emulating President George W. Bush. He is on board for
the worldwide fight against terrorism.

An observer can only offer Putin and Bush good luck. Terrorism has
always been a force in history and society, as well as in the depths of
individual human motivation - as Americans have just again been
instructed by events in the Washington area.

It was a fateful mistake for Bush to have declared his war a "war
against terrorism" after Sept. 11, 2001. That made it a war that can't
be won. At the same time, it aligned the United States with governments
around the world engaged in suppressing nationalist, regional, religious
or ethnic separatism, too often by methods of social and political
injustice.

The outrage in a Moscow theater was committed in the cause of Chechen
national independence. The attacks in New York and Washington last year
were committed by members of an international movement made up of
individuals who hate and fear the United States and its influence, and
who acted for clearly identifiable reasons, religion and nationalism
prominent among them.

The latter group, allied around Al Qaeda, can with patience eventually
be tracked down and contained, if not eliminated. The problem it poses
is within the competence of intelligence and police services. But while
it can bombed out of a headquarters, as in Afghanistan, it is not easily
bombed out of organizational existence.

The nationalists and separatists pose a different problem, one
theoretically open to political solution, as it concerns the condition
in which a political nation is to be allowed to exist.

The claims of the Chechens can be repressed for a long period of time,
at heavy cost to the Chechens, as well as to Russian standards of
national justice, and military morale and efficiency - but those claims
will go on being asserted.

The war between the Russians and the Chechens has been going on since
1783, when Catherine the Great proclaimed the Caucasus to be Russia's,
and Russian troops began to try to enforce that claim in what until then
had been a region of tribal societies and tribal authority (as in
Pakistan's North West provinces today, where Osama bin Laden is reported
to have found refuge, and where tribal law prevails).

The Chechens and their Ingush minority were Catherine's most ferocious
opponents. They fought conquest until 1859, fought Russian occupation
until 1917, were an autonomous region and then an autonomous republic
under the Bolsheviks, but collaborated with the invading Germans in
World War II. Stalin then deported many to Central Asia, and they were
allowed to return only in 1956, when he was dead.

When President Boris Yeltsin in 1991 declared the Soviet Union finished,
and invited all Russia's subject peoples "to claim as much autonomy as
they can absorb," the Chechen Parliament took him at his word and
declared national independence.

It was an independence they failed to handle, allowing instead
anarchical conditions in which kidnapping and smuggling gangs and other
criminal groups absorbed much of the power available.

This disorder opened the way to Islamist influence. Saudi Arabia was
propagating the Wahabi version of Islam in the Caucasus, and the United
States was not displeased with the Saudi program, which put another
obstacle between Russia and control of the Caucasian oil fields.

The United States also lent support to Georgia, near Chechnya, which now
has been implicitly threatened by Putin's offer to carry the war beyond
Chechnya.

Sept. 11 gave Putin the opportunity for a smooth countermove against
Washington's interest in the Caucasus. He announced that his war against
Chechen independence was part of Bush's great war against global
terrorism. If, as Bush insists, we are all either for or against
terrorism, we all must be against Chechen separatists.

This gave the United States a moral involvement in Russia's bloodiest
and potentially most dangerous internal crisis. It widens the war, not
against "terrorism," but against Muslim Chechens identifying the United
States as another of their enemies.

Bush's decision to call America's enemy "global terrorism" may have been
only a speechwriter's flourish, but it reflected the administration's
determination to tie the Sept. 11 attacks to what already was on their
agenda: the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and support for repression of
the Palestinian national movement by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of
Israel.

Adding the Russian war against Chechen independence to the mixture was
not on their agenda, but Putin has put it there. How the administration
will eventually manage all this is something the American public might
worry about as it goes to the polls next week. 

*******  http://www.iht.com/articles/75356.html


                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to