http://etherzone.com/2004/sees022404.shtml
 
Ether Zone
 

TWICE CRUCIFIED
BY A GODLESS WORLD

By: Dorothy Anne Seese

Is there any doubt as to what the world would do to Jesus, the Christ, if He were on earth today?  No.

If Mel Gibson has proved one point it is that the world hates Christ now as much as it did 2000 years ago.  That message tells us something, and that something is recorded in the first chapter of the Gospel of John:

John 3:19  And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

Because men's deed are evil, they hate Jesus, who did no evil, who preached peace and reconciliation with God the Father.  Nothing has changed in the hearts of men in this world, in Jesus' time on earth, in the world before Jesus' incarnation, or in the world before the Flood.

Gibson has produced a film about the crucifixion of Christ.  It is a movie based on the biblical accounts of what occurred between Maundy Thursday and Resurrection Sunday.

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League and similar groups are protesting that the film is "anti-Semitic."  I have yet to figure out how Jews can be "Semitic" any more than Arabs, since they are both the progeny of Abraham.  But if they wish to prove how much they hate Jesus of Nazareth, then and today, they are doing a good job of it by persecuting Mel Gibson and attempting to alter the film's content.  The Bible records that when the Roman governor Pontius Pilate attempted to release Jesus rather than the murderer Barabbas, the Jews cried out for the release of Barabbas.  Pilate, of course, was interested in pleasing Rome more than a Jewish religious mob led by Caiphas and others, so he symbolically washed his hands of the matter and turned Jesus over to be crucified by the Roman soldiers, since the Jews could not legally execute anyone -- Judea was a Roman province.

Since the film does not call for an uprising against Semitic people (Jewish or Arab), it appears that the Jews are overreacting to a biblical film in a manner that proves how hysterical they must have been at the original trial of Christ, and have placed Him on trial again and have symbolically crucified Him a second time.  What else is there to conclude with this overactive, hysterical response to a film that is largely the business of Christians and might help many to understand the brutality of the Roman methods of execution as well as what Jesus endured as the Lamb of God?  Why the open rebellion on the part of Jews?  Is anyone going to make a fuss about the life of Gandhi?  Would the Jews even have such a hissy-fit over a film about the life of Mohammed, whose religious offspring are still killing Jews daily in Israel?  Probably not.

Jesus is very special, and His life and death evoke emotions as no other Man has ever done.  That says something about Jesus that true Christians understand well, because it reveals the nature of our enemy and the invisible ruler of this world system of sin and death.

Was Jesus a Gentile?  No!  Most certainly not.  He was born of the line of David, a Jew under the Mosaic Law, He taught in the Temple, and preached the Kingdom of God.  However, He also preached that man was sinful and needed to repent.  That doesn't set too well with anyone ... Jew, Gentile or liberal Christians who like the ecumenism of the new one-world religion.

For decades I have heard Jews proclaim they would not crucify Christ were He on earth in this day and time. They would ignore him, expel him from the Temple, whatever punishment was suitable for his preaching against the evils of mankind and God's "chosen people" in particular (not the common people but the religious leaders, who are generally a politicized group in any religion).  Man simply wants to believe in his own goodness and acceptability to a holy God -- on his own terms and not God's.  That was the problem in Eden, it is the problem now, and rather than just ignoring the film, the Jewish leaders of this day have popped a brain cell over a film made by a professing Christian.

Jesus Christ, a man of peace, exposes man's evil by the reaction He incites.  That is what occurred 2000 years ago and it is what is occurring now.

It is safe to say that were the Lord Jesus Christ on earth today, He would not be honored as King of King and Lord of Lords, He would be crucified again.  Beware, however, the day He returns to judge rather than to offer salvation!

For a fact, Mel Gibson's movie "The Passion of the Christ" has drawn forth the wrath of man as it comes out of the darkness of man's sinful nature.  Not having the flesh and blood body of Christ to nail to a cross, the Jews, Gentiles, pagans and heathen have taken the next available course to vent their collective spleen:  they have verbally and politically "crucified" Mel Gibson for making the film, and in so doing, have revealed through this agent of the message what they would do to the Son of God on earth today.

Jesus was once crucified for the sin of mankind for those who believe on Him, and once resurrected for our justification, never again to be flesh and blood, and never again to die. 

Is there something about what Jesus did that incites such hatred for doing good?  Apparently so.  He brings out the worst in men and exposes it to the world, an embarrassment to the self-righteous and condemnation to those who believe in their own goodness and good works.

Since no other Man has ever evoked such hatred over centuries, it is safe to assume that the power behind such hatred is far more powerful than merely man's attitudes.  That type of continuing hatred can only be explained by Jesus' own words:

John 8:44-47  Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.  And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

Amen.



"
Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."

 


Dorothy Anne Seese is a freelance political writer for Patch Work papers and a regular columnist for Ether Zone.

We invite you to visit her website at
Flagship

Dorothy Anne Seese can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Published in the February 24, 2004 issue of  Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2004
Ether Zone.

Reply via email to