Bush acknowledges the collapsing US economy 

08/12/2005 14:23 

The US administration aims to spend $286 billion on the development of the
American transport system

US President George W. Bush released a remarkable statement a short time
ago. The remark has not been highlighted in the world media yet, although
there is every reason to do so. Bush virtually acknowledged that the USA was
experiencing a serious economic crisis. Moreover, the US government was
taking immense efforts to avoid a massive outbreak of social uneasiness, the
American president believes. 

One may come to this conclusion from the newly-signed law about the
development of the US transport system. The implementation of the law will
cost tax-payers too much money. The US government plans to spend $286
billion on the implementation of the law during the forthcoming six years.
Furthermore, Bush had to cut the costs of the law, which originally made up
$400 billion. The US Treasury, however, will have to spend only $12.3
billion during ten years to guarantee the energy security and independence
within the scope of the recently passed energy policy law. NASA's annual
budget makes up $16 billion. Therefore, the sum of $400 billion makes a huge
sum of money even from the point of view of American financial standards. 

Passing such highly expensive laws is usually accompanied with heated
debate, numerous changes and so on and so forth. This time, however, a bill
was transformed into a law a lot earlier than usual. As it was supposed, 24
billion dollars were supposed to be used for governmental subsidies to the
states, which will be fulfilling the projects of the law. Adversaries of the
law said that congressmen and senators would most likely spend the money
inappropriately, trying to insinuate their electorate. In addition, many
protest against the unwillingness of the US Congress to control the state
spending at the moment, when the budgetary shortage is to exceed the
record-breaking $333 during the current year. 

The law envisages 6,300 special projects in all states: bridges, highways,
landscape accomplishment, snowmobile tracks, etc. Is it all so bad with the
US infrastructure? George W. Bush released the key statement, which dotted
all i's at this point: the law is meant to generate more jobs and give an
incentive to the economic development of the USA. 

The triumphant leader of the world's strongest superpower would never utter
such words. The above-mentioned statements from the American president do
not characterize the USA as a great empire. Quite on the contrary, the White
House is desperately looking for measures to find employment for crowds of
unemployed American citizens and hungry migrants, which threaten to enrage
the rest of the States. 

There were 9.3 million unemployed American citizens registered in the USA in
2004. The foreign trade shortage of the USA made up $617.73 billion in 2004,
which became the record-breaking index for the USA. To crown it all, the US
state debt reached unimaginable $7.22 trillion in 2004 too. 

All optimistic reports about the rising US economy carry the short-term
efficiency only - they are presumably destined to save the demising US
dollar. Quarterly changes in the number of the unemployed by 100-200
thousand people do not change the general situation. 

The USA has already faced such hard periods in its history. Taking a look
back at the previous experience of the USA and estimating the new initiative
of the American government, one may thus infer that the law about the
transport system is like the last glimmer of hope for the US administration
to keep the nation under control. 

When massive unemployment put the USA on the brink of survival during the
Great Depression of the thirties, the government started funding the
development of the transport infrastructure - it became the only way out of
the crisis. Highways, on which the government spent billions and billions of
dollars, rescued the entire nation. It is worth mentioning that the value of
the US dollar used to be lower during that time. 

Here is another example, which bears some similarity to the present-day USA.
When Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, Germany was suffering from massive
unemployment and helpless economy. Hitler mobilized thousands of the
unemployed to build autobahns, which Germany is proud of still. The road
construction gave a very powerful impetus to the revival of the German
industry. Huge state investments triggered the industrial development, and
Germany turned into one of the strongest European superpowers. 

The White House is going along the same path now. However, there is a
certain aspect, which distinguishes the USA from the above-mentioned
examples. Both Hitler's Germany and the USA of the Great Depression period
were raising their economies up from the bottom. Nowadays, the USA enjoys
the peak of its triumphant development, which is currently being damaged
with the flaws of the American economic system. The USA obviously has
something to lose. 

Sergei Malinin
 

Read the original in Russian:
http://www.pravda.ru/economics/2005/7/21/63/20542_.html (Translated by:
Dmitry Sudakov)


http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/91/368/15972_economy.html







                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [email protected]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to