Radioactive Wounds of War

Tests on returning troops suggest serious health consequences of depleted
uranium


by Dave Lindorff
 
August 29, 2005 
In These Times  


Email this article to a friend
Print this article 


Gerard Matthew thought he was lucky. He returned from his Iraq tour a year
and a half ago alive and in one piece. But after the New York State National
Guardsman got home, he learned that a bunkmate, Sgt. Ray Ramos, and a group
of N.Y. Guard members from another unit had accepted an offer by the New
York Daily News and reporter Juan Gonzalez to be tested for depleted uranium
(DU) contamination, and had tested positive.

Matthew, 31, decided that since he'd spent much of his time in Iraq lugging
around DU-damaged equipment, he'd better get tested too. It turned out he
was the most contaminated of them all.

Matthew immediately urged his wife to get an ultrasound check of their
unborn baby. They discovered the fetus had a condition common to those with
radioactive exposure: atypical syndactyly. The right hand had only two
digits. 

So far Victoria Claudette, now 13 months old, shows no other genetic
disorders and is healthy, but Matthew feels guilty for causing her deformity
and angry at a government that never warned him about DU's dangers.

U.S. forces first used DU in the 1991 Gulf War, when some 300 tons of
depleted uranium--the waste product of nuclear power plants and weapons
facilities--were used in tank shells and shells fired by A-10 jets. A lesser
amount was deployed by U.S. and NATO forces during the Balkans conflict. But
in the current wars in Afghanistan and, especially, Iraq, DU has become the
weapon of choice, with more than 1,000 tons used in Afghanistan and more
than 3,000 tons used in Iraq. And while DU was fired mostly in the desert
during the Gulf War, in the current war in Iraq, most of DU munitions are
exploding in populated urban areas.

The Pentagon has expanded DU beyond tank and A-10 shells, for use in
bunker-busting bombs, which can spew out more than half a ton of DU in one
explosion, in anti-personnel bomblets, and even in M-16 and pistol shells.
The military loves DU for its unique penetration capability--it cuts through
steel or concrete like they're butter.

The problem is that when DU hits its target, it burns at a high temperature,
throwing off clouds of microscopic particles that poison a wide area and
remain radioactive for billions of years. If inhaled, these particles can
lodge in lungs, other organs or bones, irradiating tissue and causing
cancers. 

Worse yet, uranium is also a highly toxic heavy metal. Indeed, while there
is some debate over the risk posed by the element's radioactive emissions,
there is no debate regarding its chemical toxicity. According to Mt. Sinai
pathologist Thomas Fasey, who participated in the New York Guard unit
testing, the element has an affinity for bonding with DNA, where even trace
amounts can cause cancers and fetal abnormalities.

Dr. Doug Rokke, a health physicist at the University of Illinois who headed
up a Pentagon study of depleted uranium weapons in the mid '90s after
concerns were raised during the Gulf War, concluded there was no safe way to
use the weapons. Rokke says the Pentagon responded by denouncing him, after
earlier commending his work. 

No one knows how many U.S. soldiers have been contaminated by DU residue.
Despite regulations authorizing tests for any military personnel who
suspects exposure, the U.S. military is avoiding doing those tests--or
delaying them until they are meaningless. 

"When we asked to be tested at Ft. Dix, they wrongly told us we didn't have
to worry unless we had DU fragments in our body," says Matthew. His buddy,
Sgt. Ramos, who exhibits symptoms resembling radiation sickness and heavy
metal poisoning, adds that at Walter Reed Medical Center he was grilled for
hours about why he wanted to be tested and was then branded a troublemaker
by his own unit. Matthew says Walter Reed "lost" his sample.

At the war's start, the United States refused to allow U.N. or other
environmental inspectors to test DU levels within Iraq. Now the United
Nations won't even go near Iraq because of security concerns.

"It doesn't seem right that we are poisoning the places we are supposed to
be liberating," Ramos says.

The Pentagon continues to insist, on the basis of no field evidence, that DU
is safe. To date, only some 270 returned troops have been tested for DU
contamination by the military and Veterans Affairs. But even those tests,
mostly urine samples, are useless 30 days after exposure, because by that
time most of the DU has left the body or migrated into bones or organs. 

Gonzalez and the Daily News paid for costlier tests for nine
Guardsmen--tests that could pinpoint uranium inside the body and identify
the special isotope signature of man-made DU. Four of the nine tested
positive for DU; all had symptoms of uranium poisoning.

Even harder evidence may soon arrive. Connecticut State Representative Pat
Dillon (D-New Haven), a Yale-trained epidemiologist, has crafted state-level
legislation that Connecticut and Louisiana have unanimously passed,
authorizing returned National Guard troops to request and receive
specialized DU contamination tests at the Pentagon's expense. This approach
bypasses the Pentagon's feet-dragging because National Guard troops fall
under state, rather than federal, jurisdiction. 

"This was not a Democratic or a Republican issue," Dillon says. "These are
our kids and someone needs to protect them." She says that since passage of
her bill, which takes effect this October, military groups and family
organizations, state legislators, and even National Guard unit commanders
have contacted her for copies of her bill to promote in their states. Bob
Smith, a veteran in Louisiana who got hold of Dillon's bill and spearheaded
a successful effort to pass similar legislation in Louisiana, claims that 14
to 20 other states are considering similar measures.

If enough Guard troops avail themselves of the testing--and start testing
positive for contamination--it seems likely that reservists and active duty
troops and veterans will demand similar access to rigorous tests, which can
cost upwards of $1000 per person.

One way or another, the Pentagon will pay a price. "DU is a war crime. It's
that simple," Rokke says. "Once you've scattered all this stuff around, and
then refuse to clean it up, you've committed a war crime." 


Dave Lindorff, an In These Times contributing editor, is the author of This
Can't Be Happening: Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy. His
work can be found at This Can't Be Happening.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility
of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for
Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in their
entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as
the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an
active URL hyperlink address to the original CRG article must be indicated.
The author's copyright note must be displayed. For publication of Global
Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet
sites, contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in
an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and
social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and
educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes
other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

C Copyright Dave Lindorff, In These Times, 2005 

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=DAV20050829&article
Id=878  

http://www.antic.org









                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [email protected]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to