The Guardian - Sep 10, 2005
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5282550-103677,00.html 
 
Britain now faces its own blowback:
Intelligence interests may thwart the 
Brits. 
 
by Michael Meacher
 
The videotape of the suicide bomber Mohammad 
Sidique Khan has switched the focus of the 
London bombings away from the establishment 
view of brainwashed, murderous individuals and 
highlighted a starker political reality. 
 
While there can be no justification for horrific killings 
of this kind, they need to be understood against the 
ferment of the last decade radicalising Muslim youth 
of Pakistani origin living in Europe.
 
During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 
1980s, the US funded large numbers of jihadists 
through Pakistan's secret intelligence service, the 
ISI. Later the US wanted to raise another jihadi 
corps, again using proxies, to help Bosnian Muslims 
fight to weaken the Serb government's hold on 
Yugoslavia. Those they turned to included Pakistanis 
in Britain.
 
According to a recent report by the Delhi-based 
Observer Research Foundation, a contingent was 
also sent by the Pakistani government, then led by 
Benazir Bhutto, at the request of the Clinton 
administration. This contingent was formed from 
the Harkat-ul- Ansar (HUA) terrorist group and 
trained by the ISI. The report estimates that about 
200 Pakistani Muslims living in the UK went to 
Pakistan, trained in HUA camps and joined the 
HUA's contingent in Bosnia. Most significantly, this 
was "with the full knowledge and complicity of the 
British and American intelligence agencies".
 
As the 2002 Dutch government report on Bosnia 
makes clear, the US provided a green light to 
groups on the state department list of terrorist 
organisations, including the Lebanese-based 
Hizbullah, to operate in Bosnia - an episode that 
calls into question the credibility of the 
subsequent "war on terror".
 
For nearly a decade the US helped Islamist 
insurgents linked to Chechnya, Iran and Saudi 
Arabia destabilise the former Yugoslavia. The 
insurgents were also allowed to move further 
east to Kosovo. By the end of the fighting in 
Bosnia there were tens of thousands of 
Islamist insurgents in Bosnia, Croatia and 
Kosovo; many then moved west to Austria, 
Germany and Switzerland.
 
Less well known is evidence of the British 
government's relationship with a wider Islamist 
terrorist network. During an interview on Fox 
TV this summer, the former US federal 
prosecutor John Loftus reported that British 
intelligence had used the al-Muhajiroun group 
in London to recruit Islamist militants with 
British passports for the war against the Serbs 
in Kosovo. Since July Scotland Yard has been 
interested in an alleged member of al-Muhajiroun, 
Haroon Rashid Aswat, who some sources have 
suggested could have been behind the London 
bombings.
 
According to Loftus, Aswat was detained in 
Pakistan after leaving Britain, but was released 
after 24 hours. He was subsequently returned 
to Britain from Zambia, but has been detained 
solely for extradition to the US, not for 
questioning about the London bombings. Loftus 
claimed that Aswat is a British-backed double 
agent, pursued by the police but protected by 
MI6.
 
One British Muslim of Pakistani origin radicalised 
by the civil war in Yugoslavia was LSE-educated 
Omar Saeed Sheikh. He is now in jail in Pakistan 
under sentence of death for the killing of the US 
journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002 - although many 
(including Pearl's widow and the US authorities) 
doubt that he committed the murder. However, 
reports from Pakistan suggest that Sheikh 
continues to be active from jail, keeping in touch 
with friends and followers in Britain.
 
Sheikh was recruited as a student by
 Jaish-e-Muhammad (Army of Muhammad), 
which operates a network in Britain. It has 
actively recruited Britons from universities 
and colleges since the early 1990s, and 
has boasted of its numerous British Muslim 
volunteers. Investigations in Pakistan have 
suggested that on his visits there Shehzad 
Tanweer, one of the London suicide 
bombers, contacted members of two 
outlawed local groups and trained at two 
camps in Karachi and near Lahore. Indeed 
the network of groups now being uncovered 
in Pakistan may point to senior al-Qaida 
operatives having played a part in selecting 
members of the bombers' cell. The Observer 
Research Foundation has argued that there 
are even "grounds to suspect that the 
[London] blasts were orchestrated by Omar 
Sheikh from his jail in Pakistan".
 
Why then is Omar Sheikh not being dealt with 
when he is already under sentence of death? 
Astonishingly his appeal to a higher court against 
the sentence was adjourned in July for the 32nd 
time and has since been adjourned indefinitely. 
This is all the more remarkable when this is the 
same Omar Sheikh who, at the behest of General 
Mahmood Ahmed, head of the ISI, wired $100,000 
to Mohammed Atta, the leading 9/11 hijacker, 
before the New York attacks, as confirmed by 
Dennis Lormel, director of FBI's financial crimes 
unit.
 
Yet neither Ahmed nor Omar appears to have 
been sought for questioning by the US about 
9/11. Indeed, the official 9/11 Commission 
Report of July 2004 sought to downplay the 
role of Pakistan with the comment: "To date, 
the US government has not been able to 
determine the origin of the money used for the 
9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little 
practical significance" - a statement of 
breathtaking disingenuousness.
 
All this highlights the resistance to getting at 
the truth about the 9/11 attacks and to an 
effective crackdown on the forces fomenting 
terrorist bombings in the west, including 
Britain. The extraordinary US forbearance 
towards Omar Sheikh, its restraint towards 
the father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, Dr AQ 
Khan, selling nuclear secrets to Iran, Libya 
and North Korea, the huge US military 
assistance to Pakistan and the US decision 
last year to designate Pakistan as a major 
non-Nato ally in south Asia all betoken a 
deeper strategic set of goals as the real 
priority in its relationship with Pakistan. 
These might be surmised as Pakistan 
providing sizeable military contingents 
for Iraq to replace US troops, or Pakistani
troops replacing NATO forces in 
Afghanistan. Or it could involve the use of 
Pakistani military bases for US intervention 
in Iran, or strengthening Pakistan as a base 
in relation to India and China.
 
Whether the hunt for those behind the London 
bombers can prevail against these powerful 
political forces remains to be seen. Indeed it 
may depend on whether Scotland Yard, in its 
attempts to uncover the truth, can prevail over 
MI6, which is trying to cover its tracks and in
practice has every opportunity to operate 
beyond the law under the cover of national 
security.
 
[Michael Meacher is the Labour MP for Oldham 
West and Royton; he was environment minister 
from 1997 to 2003.]       
======================================

                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [email protected]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to