http://www.istina.at/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=697&Itemid=62
Istina, broj 38
13.novembar, 2005.
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI:
THE MEPHISTO OF AMERICA
In the largest American newspaper printed outside of
America, The International Herald Tribune of October 14, 2005,
Zbigniew Brzezinski published a very critical article on President
George W. Bush, showing him to have by his policy, especially his war
against Iraq, raised a universal hatred of the Islamic world in
particular against themselves. As a conceited person, Bush did nothing
but apply the ideas, preached during decades by Brzezinski himself,
for the American domination of the world.
ISTINA reproduces from Balkans-info review,
www.b-I-infos.com , this article by Komnen Becirovic written shortly
after the events in Ukraine at the end of 2004 inspired precisely by
Zbigniew Brzezinski simply by the fact that it is the outcome of his
strategy for the downfall of Russia. It is to be reminded that this
American Pole was the lecturer of such human monsters as Madeleine
Albright and Richard Holbrooke, as far as we the Serbs are concerned,
and it was he who praised the United States for testing successfully
new weapons at the time of the war of NATO against Serbia.
The editor
KOMNEN BECIROVIC
What could not be seen or heard on television, radio or in
the press about the thirst for freedom and justice of the Ukrainian
people, its burning desire to free itself from the Russian slave
supervision and join the European Union and NATO, the spontaneous and
democratic character of the demonstrations in Kiev, the Russian
interference in the Ukrainian concerns, the complete innocence and
honesty of the Westerners, the fraudulent poll and the victory stolen
to the opposition at the time of the presidential elections that took
place in the country in November-December 2004. It was said that the
fate of the world depended on the arrival at the head of Ukraine of
Victor Iouchtchenko whose face was mysteriously devastated by acne and
who was suddenly promoted knight if not martyr of democracy.
However the gigantic orange Kiev joke, relayed by the
media throughout the world, had been conceived, staged and financed by
the United Sates of America which continues without slackening to
weave its vast conspiracy against Russia while launching libellous
media campaigns against it, by encircling it with military bases by
means of widening NATO, by moving the ex Soviet people against it
while insidiously organizing economic or any other type of subversion
from within. The obvious goal is to destabilize and weaken Russia
before being in a position to seize its riches, dismember it and erase
it from the map of the world.
Let it suffice, for those who still doubt of it, to reopen
the book written eight years ago by the geopolitical expert, the
apostle of the New American world order, Zbigniew Brzezinski, The
great Chessboard where he develops the ideas of the geostrategic
collapse of Russia in the Soviet ex-republics and throughout Eurasia.
It is this Polish citizen now naturalized American, who, as an adviser
to the President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981, designed the Afghan
Islamic trap for the Russians without suspecting that the Islamic trap
which was to hasten the collapse of the Soviet Union would not be long
before boomeranging back against America. So it was worthwhile and
Brzezinski did not fail to boast of it particularly in a famous
interview with Le Nouvel Observateur on January 15, 1998.
He thus became the main inspirer of the hegemonic policy
of the United States with the spectacular result of the war against
the Serbs waged by his enthusiastic disciple Madeleine Korbel Albright
and the contribution she made in favour of the expansion of NATO to
the East in view of the conquest of Eurasia. However the influence of
the Talibans over Afghanistan which had to be reversed at the price of
a terrible war, the emergence of the Al-Qaida hydra from within the
Islamic world with its apocalyptic attack on Manhattan, on September
11, 2001, as well as other terrorist attacks, the American power stuck
in Iraq, the spectre of future wars looming on the horizon against
Iran, Syria, North Korea and even Russia, finally the universal
anti-Americanism are as many grapes of wrath of the guilty Brzezinski
doctrines to the point that this great guru of the American domination
of the world may end up by being the author of its downfall, its evil
spirit, its Méphisto.
His cold, rational and atavistic hatred of Russia, only
equal to that of the Nazi ideologists, has appeared in particular
about Ukraine which according to him should be detached and estranged
from Russia in order to put a final stop to Moscow imperial ambitions:
"The independence of Ukraine modifies the very nature of the Russian
State. For that reason, this new important slot on the Eurasian
chessboard becomes a geopolitical mainspring. Without Ukraine, Russia
ceases to be an empire in Eurasia. And even if it tried to regain such
a status, the centre of gravity would then be moved and that mainly
Asian empire would then be doomed to weakness and be involved in
permanent conflicts with its agitated vassals of central Asia." He
also writes: "Without Ukraine and its fifty two million Slav brothers,
any attempt made by Moscow to restore the empire is doomed to run
against the prolonged resistance of populations who have become
finicky about their national and religious identity." Almost like a
man obsessed, he continues in that vein throughout many pages when he
denounces the divine right of Russia to Ukraine, he almost denies the
organic tie binding the two countries, supports the artificial
creation of Ukraine within its present boundaries by Bolsheviks
determined to fight the famous Russian hegemony, he pleads for Ukraine
sovereignty over Crimea given as a gift to the Republic by Khrushchev
in 1954, he rejoices of the systematic refusal by the Ukrainian
leaders of a natural union between Russia end Byelorussia. On the
other hand, he insists on the creation of the Washington sponsored
alliance between Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Moldavia
in answer to the agreements reached between Russia and Byelorussia. He
never ceases to repeat that Ukraine represents the vital stake in the
rollback of Russia, the new strategy to replace that of containment
developed by George Kennan in 1947 and applied for almost half a
century of cold war.
Having for main goal to weaken Russia, to cut it from its
southern part and the Black Sea, ultimately to draw it back to the
limits existing before Pierre the Great and Catherine II, Brzezinski's
doctrine does not rest on any geographical, historical or ethnic
basis. He deliberately ignores the Kiev Russian epic during the X and
XI centuries with the Rurikide sovereigns such as Vladimir the Great
who made Russia to be baptized in 988, Iaroslav the Wise who after
Charlemagne promulgated the first code of laws in Europe, the famous
Rousskaïa Pravda, Vladimir II Monomach, an untiring warrior who
victoriously carried out eighty five expeditions and led the Kiev
empire to its climax before its destruction by the Mongols. According
to this expert of Russia's downfall working for the United States, the
battle of Koulikovo in 1380 when Dimitri Donskoï defeated the Tartars
and started the liberation process from the Mongolian yoke has never
taken place. Neither has the Cossack insurrection led by Bogdan
Khmelnitski in 1646 in order to release Ukraine from Polish oppression
which led to the creation in 1654 of the Pereslav's parliament called
Rada that obtained from the Tsar Alexis Mikhaïlovitch the protection
for the part of the country east of the Dniepr river. No mention
either in Brzezinski's list of arguments of the Poltava battle in 1709
when Pierre le Grand crushed the armies of Charles XII and his ally,
the traitor Hetman Mazeppa in the very heart of Ukraine, thus putting
an end after thirty years to the war in the North and to Swedish
imperialism! The two liberation wars waged by Catherine II from 1769
to 1774 and from 1787 to 1791 which freed all Southern Russia as well
as Bessarabia and Moldavia from Turkish slavery and made it possible
to create Odessa and Sebastopol in Crimea has never taken place
either! The Ukrainians would have been so oppressed by the Russians
that the famous statesmen like Grégory Potemkine and Alexander
Bezdorodko, Ukrainian citizens, would never have run the Russian
empire! Finally Gogol, one of the giants of Russian and universal
literature, born in Poltava, would just simply be a Ukrainian author!
Actually, by being deprived of Ukraine, Russia is not only to be
deprived of its territories and riches, but also of its history and
civilisation!
The only thing about Ukraine that matters in Brzezinski's
mind and which overrides all other geographical, historical,
ethnographic or etymological considerations is the Polish wild dream
of a Ukrainian nation that was mainly invented by Pantéleïmon Koulich,
a writer, and Mikaïl Grouchevski, an historian, then taken up by the
Bolsheviks who made use of the latter. They gave reality to the
fiction in the form of a Ukrainian republic by usurping vast
territories of central Old Russia whereas the Russian word oukraïna or
the Serb word kraïna only means borders and refers to the southern
Russian lands which Poland long shared with the Tartars. For
Brzezinski, this fierce anticommunist, the Bolsheviks and their
followers miserably failed in every possible way except for the
creation of many republics and that of Ukraine in particular from the
ruins of imperial Russia in which they have been marvellously
successful. In fact Brzezinski only sees Ukraine through his Polish
anti-Russian phantasms putting up a logical appearance at the service
of America's penetration into the heart of Russia.
More than a decade after the elaboration of the program,
it has never ceased to be applied and reached its climax last autumn
in Kiev thanks to the commitment of such promoters of democracy as
George Soros with his Open Society Institute, James Woolsey, the
former chief executive of the CIA, with his Freedom House, the above
mentioned Madeleine Albright, the ex Secretary of State, with her
National Democratic Institute, along with the National Endowment for
democracy, one of CIA numerous offspring. Without being exhaustive,
the USAID agency directly connected with the American government must
be added to those organisations which proved to be efficient at the
time of the so called velvet revolutions which took place in Serbia in
2000 and in Georgia in 2003.
Obviously Brzezinski is far from limiting his strategy
only to Ukraine since he goes as far as preaching the dislocation of
the Russian federation itself by means of decentralisation to give the
United States a clear field on the great Eurasian chessboard. He
writes: " A more decentralized Russia would have less imperialist
aims. A more open confederation which would include a European Russia,
a Siberian and a far eastern republic would have more facilities." At
the same time he praises the democratic merits of Turkey in spite of
its repressive policy towards the Kurds and greets the return of its
influence in the Caucasus. He continues to play the part of the
protector of the Islamic fanatical Chechens and to gesticulate as a
man of peace between them and the Russians. He winks at communist
China about Siberia. He invites the European Union to join the United
States in their campaign to let Russia decline. He admits that the
famous responsible strategic partnership offered by Washington to
Moscow to run the world together was a red herring meant to deceive
the Russian leaders, nationalists and westerners alike starting with
Elstine. "Never had the United States the least intention to share
their worldwide pre-eminence and even if it had been the case their
ego would never have been capable of putting up with it." He writes
while rejoicing of the many Russian handicaps among which the
inability of former leaders to adopt the policy required by the new
situation. And the fearful strategist for the downfall of Russia adds
not without cynicism: " As soon as the first disagreements appeared
between "the responsible strategic partners", the disparities at every
level - political power, financial weight, capacity for technological
innovation, power of cultural attraction - proved the inanity of such
a notion. It was enough for many Russians to draw the conclusion that
the slogan devised by the Americans was only meant to deceive them."
While this tactic worked wonder with Eltsine, the United
States in collusion with the European Union betting on two major
assets to ensure Russia's descent into Hell, namely democracy and the
dipsomania and ignorance of the character, things began to change with
the arrival of Poutine. His attempts to stop the disaster and his
measures aimed at putting the State on its feet again, restraining the
power of the oligarchs, recovering the national riches usurped by
them, limiting the power of the regional governors in favour of the
central power to avoid Russia's balkanisation were qualified by the
western Establishment of so many instances of Poutine's authoritarian
tendency to drift.
The open letter sent to the Heads of State and Governments
of the European Union and NATO written by 115 unconditional United
States sympathisers shortly after the Beslan tragedy that took place
in September 2004 urging the western leaders to stop "embracing"
Poutine is only too revealing of the present Russophobia prevailing in
the West, and more particularly of the dread to see the Russian giant
being able to stand up again after having knelt too long. The
exhaustive list of those who signed the letter including such
coryphaeus of humanism and democracy as Vaclac Havel, Richard
Holbooke, James Woolsey, José Maria Aznar, André Glucksman, Bernard
Kouchner can be found on the Voltaire web site which rightly deserves
its name on account of its intelligence, truthful spirit and
non-conformist attitude.
However the most extraordinary thing is that Brzezinski,
the cold monster, the oracle of the new slavish domination of the
world lost his nerve and became so angry as to call the President
Poutine Mussolini and compare present Russia with fascist Italy in the
Wall Street Journal edition of September 20, 2004 where he writes: "M.
Poutine's regime looks in many ways like Mussolini's fascism. The Duce
made the trains run on time. He centralized political power in the
name of chauvinism. He imposed political control over the economy
without nationalizing it.the fascist regime has evoked national
greatness, discipline and has exalted the myth of an allegedly
glorious past." And so on and so forth, the whole article is infused
with the perverse logic according to which an Americanised Pole, with
so unpronounceable a name that most of his fellow citizens shorten it
in Zbig, can be a great United States patriot and set himself up as a
master of patriotism whereas the Russian President could not be so in
his own country. At the same time, in his last book The True Choice,
he continues, as Faust the tempter, to flatter the imperial demons of
America and dangerously set it up against Russia and the rest of the
world.
Obviously Russia must be conscious of it and disregarding
the grotesque recriminations and slanders must continue to take the
appropriate measures, whether political, economic, military or others,
so as to be able, as at the time of Nevsky or Donskoï, to face the new
crusaders and Tartars - those of democracy which beseige the country
and threaten its very existence.
Serbian News Network - SNN
[email protected]
http://www.antic.org/
