Slobo buried, but can Serbia forget history?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455543.cms
 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 
The Dominion
 
media analysis <http://dominionpaper.ca/media_analysis/> , 
 
by Dru Oja Jay
 
Milosevic the Guilty?
http://dominionpaper.ca/media_analysis/2006/03/17/milosevic_.html
 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
http://dominionpaper.ca/media_analysis/2006/03/18/the_origin.html
 
March 18, 2006 

The Origins of the War in the Balkans


Part two in a five part series on the former Yugoslavia

Slobodan Milosevic isn't only charged with war crimes. The Globe's Doug
Saunders says that Milosevic is "considered responsible for 250,000 deaths
and the descent of the former Yugoslavia into terrible ethnic warfare." 

Though Saunders does not say who "considers" Milosevic responsible, he is
certainly not the only commentator to repeat the claim.

The media's failure to examine facts on the ground (or at least, their
failure to tell their readers about them) extends beyond Milosevic himself
to the entire history of Yugoslavia's civil war.

Between 1960 and 1980, Yugoslavia--a federation consisting of multiple
ethnic groups, including Albanians, Hungarians, Slovenes, Egyptians,
Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats--was, by objective measures, a prosperous
country. Economic growth was vigorous, all citizens had a guaranteed right
to income, a month of paid vacation, and life expectancy was seventy-two
years. The federation's many national and linguistic groups coexisted
peacefully through a complex complex system of government spanning multiple
languages and semiautonomous regions.

As Michael Parenti writes in To Kill a Nation: The Attack on
Yugoslavia--which documents the history of US and European
intervention--Yugoslavian leaders committed a "disastrous error" in the
1970s: they borrowed money from the West. When western economies entered a
recession, free trade principles gave way to economic self-preservation, and
Yugoslavian exports were blocked, to devastating effect.

Earlier borrowing brought with it the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and
the World Bank, which demanded that the economy be "restructured". This
process, Parenti writes, included "wage freezes, the abolition of state
subsidized prices, increased unemployment, elimination of most
worker-managed enterprises, and massive cuts in social spending." According
to the World Bank's figures, restructuring produced six hundred thousand
layoffs in 1989-90 alone.

Taking control of monetary policy by 1991, the IMF effectively broke
Yugoslavia into pieces by preventing transfer payments to the republics
(such as Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia) from the federal government and
assigning debt to each of the member republics.

Serbia, Parenti notes, was the most hostile to IMF "reforms", with 650,000
workers (joined, in many cases, by workers of other ethnicities in Serbia
and other republics) engaging in "massive walkouts and protests".

For Parenti and others, all available evidence points to a long term,
deliberate campaign on the part of the US, Britain, and Germany (among
others) to destabilize and divide the last socialist holdout in eastern
Europe. Before the economic collapse, almost all observers agree that people
from many ethnic backgrounds coexisted peacefully. The economic destruction
of Yugoslavia, Parenti argues, caused different nationalities to "compete
more furiously than ever for a share" of rapidly declining economic wealth.
"Once the bloodletting starts, the cycle of vengeance and retribution takes
on a momentum of its own."

In 1990, the US threatened to cut off aid if Yugoslavia did not hold
elections, but insisted that elections be held only in the republics, not at
the federal level. In 1991, the European Community organized a conference on
Yugoslavia, which called for its division into "sovereign and independent
republics," at which point Yugoslavian representatives were barred from
attending any more of the conference meetings.

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which has most recently called
attention to itself by financing political groups that fomented military
coups against elected governments in Haiti and Venezuela, was also involved
in the Yugoslavian civil war and the ensuing conflict. Allan Weinstein, one
of the NED's founders, was candid about the mission of the NED, which is
funded directly by the US federal government. "A lot of what we do today was
done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," Weinstein said in 1991.

According to research conducted by William Blum, a scholar of US
interventions abroad, the NED described the mandate of its 1997-98 programs
as aiming to "identify barriers to private sector development at the local
and federal levels in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and to push for
legislative change...[and] to develop strategies for private sector growth."

Starting in 1988, the NED provided millions of dollars to "independent
media", "opposition political parties", and "pro-democracy nongovernmental
organizations", "student groups", "labour unions" and "think tanks"
throughout the former Yugoslavia. According to testimony in Senate hearings,
in the two years leading up to the Kosovo crisis, the US government provided
$16.5 million for democracy promotion in Serbia alone, mostly through the
NED. Proportional to population, and not accounting for lower pay scales,
the equivalent amount of funding for Canadian media and political groupings
would be roughly $46 million.

A Milosevic-headed Serbian government did eventually pass legislation
<http://www.vii.org/monroe/issue56/serbia.htm>  that decreed that media
could face steep fines for circulating false information, forcing
US-sponsored newspapers and radio stations to move to Montenegro. The US,
however, has even less tolerance for outside funding of its democracy.
Senator John Kerry, for example, found himself the subject of a firestorm of
media criticism when his 2004 presidential campaign accepted a $2,000 cheque
from a private citizen of South Korea (not a government group). Kerry sent
the cheque back and vowed to do more thorough "background checks" on
campaign donors.

The Canada Elections Act prohibits any groups that receives money from a
foreign source from using it for "election advertising purposes". Canada
also maintains extensive regulations preventing foreign ownership of the
media.

Are critics like Parenti and Blum right? How does their evidence stack up to
that provided by Canadian media? This is difficult to say, because almost
all news media in Canada and the US have ignored the role of the West in the
demise of Yugoslavia and the United States' subsequent well-financed
political interventions.

"In the eyes of the global media," writes University of Ottawa economist
Michel Chossudovsky, "Western powers bear no responsibility for the
impoverishment and destruction of a nation of 24 million people." Instead,
the prevailing view continues to be that the US, Canada, and other NATO
powers acted benevolently to end the conflict. 

Meanwhile, the breakup continues. NED-funded political parties, currently
governing in Serbia-Montenegro's autonomous province of Montenegro (and,
since 2000, Serbia itself) are currently preparing for a referendum on
secession.

Further reading:

» William Blum: Trojan Horse: The National Endowment for Democracy
<http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/National%20EndowmentDemo.html> 

» Michel Chossudovsky: Dismantling Former Yugoslavia, Recolonising Bosnia
<http://sarantakos.com/kosovo/ks3yugo.html> 

» Cathrin Schütz: The Militarism of German Foreign Policy and the
Dismantling of a State <http://www.counterpunch.org/schutz06052004.html> 

» Jared Israel et alia: The Nuts & Bolts of a Scam... How the U.S. has
Created a Corrupt Opposition in Serbia
<http://www.tenc.net/analysis/scam.htm> 

» Post-Soviet Media Law and Policy: Media Law in Serbia-Montenegro
<http://www.vii.org/monroe/issue56/serbia.htm> 

» James Ciment and Immanuel Ness: NED and the Empire's New Clothes
<http://www.covertaction.org/content/view/100/75/> 

» George Szamuely: The National Evisceration of Democracy
<http://www.antiwar.com/szamuely/sz-col.html> 

» US Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Prospects for Democracy in
Yugoslavia <http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/hearin.htm> 

» Neil Clark: The spoils of another war
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/Kosovo/Story/0,2763,1309165,00.html> 

» Al Giordano: Do Foreign Governments Have a "Human Right" to Buy Venezuela
Elections? <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2005/7/9/113427/7207> 

» Elections Canada: Questions and Answers About Third Party Election
Advertising
<http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=pol&document=index&dir=thi/que&;
lang=e&textonly=false> 

» Yves Engler: Market Famines and the IMF
<http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=2&ItemID=8494> 

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

http://dominionpaper.ca/media_analysis/2006/03/19/the_media_.html
 
March 19, 2006 

The Media War


Part three in a five-part series on the former Yugoslavia

Extensive analysis and the public record has shown that during the series of
civil wars that beset the former Yugoslavia, the Western news media provided
coverage that was, by any objective standard, misleading and in many cases
completely false. 

Recent media reports have simply stopped referring to mass graves and death
camps where hundreds of thousands of people were--according to breathless
TV, radio and newspaper reports during the war--systematically raped,
tortured, and killed.

Seven years later, little evidence supporting the conclusion that such vast
atrocities took place has surfaced, though casual references to genocide and
ethnic cleansing find themselves sharing a sentence with the name Milosevic.
Evidence does show that tens of thousands of combatants and civilians died
in the tragic decade-long conflict. Hundreds of thousands were displaced,
forced to live in refugee camps. 

The silence of the same journalists that were scrambling to tell the world
about genocide on the scale of "Hitler or Stalin" both leaves readers the
impression that hundreds of thousands of innocents were in fact killed, and
undermines the credibility of future reports of genocide. The media's
collective credibility is further undermined by its ongoing silence about
conflicts where hundreds of thousands of people are being killed, with
western complicity or support: West Papua
<http://www.antiwar.com/orig/pilger.php>  and the Congo
<http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat2.htm#Co98> , for example.

George Kenney, who resigned from the US State Department in 1992 to protest
the Bush administration's policies in the then-disintegrating Yugoslavia,
wrote in 1996 that "much of the early war was fought not on the battlefield
but through high-powered (and high-priced) lobbying firms."

"Since late 1992 there has also been a splendidly effective volunteer army
of journalists, think-tank analysts, Capitol Hill staff and administration
hawks pushing the Bosnian, and secondarily Croatian, causes," wrote Kenney.
The Yugoslavian civil war began when Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia and Macedonia
seceded from Yugoslavia with US and European funding and encouragement. In
the case of Croatia and Bosnia, significant Serb minorities insisted on
autonomy or rejoining Yugoslavia, which was not consistent with the
US-European plan. That in the case of Croatia, members of the Serb minority
had their rights systematically violated by the US- and German-backed
government also did not matter.

In America, Kenney wrote, "it is almost impossible to be too anti-Serb."

UN and NATO investigations have shown that military and paramilitary groups
on all sides--and NATO, which dropped 20,000 tonnes of bombs on
Serbia--committed atrocities. However, the record also shows that again and
again, news media reported made-up atrocities attributed to Serb forces,
while taking minimal interest in atrocities committed against Serbs.
Evidence of crimes committed by Serbs sometimes turned out to be crimes
perpetrated against Serbs, as was the case with BBC footage of a "Bosnian
prisoner of war in a concentration camp" who was later identified as a
Bosnian Serb in a Muslim detention camp. No evidence of Serbian
"concentration camps" ever surfaced, though conditions in detention camps on
all sides were predictably brutal.

In other cases, unidentified bodies were attributed to untold Serb
atrocities before being identified as belonging to a particular ethnic group
or even as noncombatants. 

In a shocking number of cases, estimates of thousands of victims were
reported where later only a few dozen bodies were found.

The most striking example was State Department official David Scheffer's
estimate--in the middle of the NATO bombing campaign--that "as many as
225,000 ethnic Albanian men aged between 14 and 59 remain unaccounted for."
The shocking estimate, reported widely in the media, was later reduced when
the British government circulated an estimate that 10,000 were missing. A
month later, NATO-led peacekeepers told the press that a total of 2,150
bodies had been found, of which 850 were civilians. It was evidence of war
crimes, but of a significantly smaller scale than had been initially
reported.

The radical revision of estimates after the shocking headlines were several
news cycles behind was exemplary of reporting during the war. In most cases,
horrifying headlines attributed to "government sources"--often ones with an
interest in a particular outcome--were followed up with obscure corrections.

According to many sources, Bosnian Muslim leaders like President Izetbegovic
were keenly aware of the impact of images of suffering on international
public opinion. In the case of several high-profile massacres in Sarajevo
that made headlines and rallied western support, for example, UN
investigations later revealed that Bosnian Muslim forces had slaughtered
their own people.

Atrocities against Serbs went unreported or underreported, including
villages burned to the ground, testimony (by victims, not unnamed government
sources) describing gang rape by Croatian militias, and murderous
attacks--killing hundreds of Serbian civilians--by Muslim forces stationed
at Srebrenica prior to the massacre of hundreds of Muslims there by Serb
forces.

In the case of Srebrenica, the number of "over 8,000" missing Muslims is
often cited, but the number of bodies found in a massive search of the area
is under 3,000, as of last October. Only a fraction have been identified,
and the bodies include soldiers and fighters on both sides killed in three
years of war. One can be relatively certain that Serbian troops executed at
least 153 prisoners of war in one case, which few will dispute is a horrific
war crime. Evidence on the public record after extensive searches, however,
does not support the much larger numbers or charges of genocide. This does
not necessarily mean that larger atrocities did not take place, but simply
that supporting evidence has not been found after a major investigation.

Public relations firms played a key role in the disinformation around the
war. Ruder Finn was one such firm, employed at various times by Croatia,
Muslim Bosnia and the Albanian parliamentary opposition in Kosovo.

In a notable exception to media orthodoxy, the National Post's Isabel
Vincent reported in 1998: 

        If the plight of Kosovo Albanians is today viewed around the world
as an issue of self-determination for an oppressed minority group, then it
is largely due to the efforts of former Ruder Finn executive James Harff,
who almost single-handedly reduced a historically complex conflict to a
black and white morality play, complete with oppressed good guys and
bloodthirsty bad guys.

In 1993, Harff told French journalist Jacques Morlino that he was "most
proud" of Ruder Finn's successful bid to mobilize major Jewish organizations
like the B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee and
the American Jewish Congress. According to Morlino's transcript, Harff said
that 

        There was every reason then for Jewish intellectuals and
organizations to be hostile to the Croats and Bosnians. Our challenge was to
reverse this state of things. And we succeeded in masterly fashion... The
entry into the fray of Jewish organizations on the side of the Bosnians was
an extraordinary move. All at once, we were able to make public opinion
equate Serbs and Nazis. The dossier was complex, nobody understood what was
going on in Bosnia... But in one stroke we were able to present a simple
matter, a story with good guys and bad guys. We knew that the business would
be played out on this terrain... All at once, there was a very clear change
of language in the press with the employment of terms with a very strong
emotive value, such as ethnic cleansing, concentration camps, etc., all
evoking Nazi Germany, the gas chambers and Auschwitz. The emotive charge was
so strong that no one could go against the dominant current, except on pain
of being accused of revisionism. We hit the bull's eye.

When Morlino pointed out that Harff didn't have any proof of claims
circulated to media by Ruder Finn, Harff responded that "Our business is not
to verify information. We're not equipped to do that. Our business... is to
accelerate the circulation of information that is favorable to us... That's
what we did. We didn't assert that there were death camps in Bosnia, we let
it be known that Newsday asserted it."

Pressed by Morlino, Harff insisted, "We're professionals. We had work to do
and we did it. We're not paid to practice morality."

Journalists, on the other hand, have taken great pains to point out that
they practice morality. In this regard, their continued silence on the
question of evidence--while repeating claims without any substantiation--is
confusing.

Further Reading:

» Diana Johnstone: Srebrenica Revisited
<http://www.counterpunch.org/johnstone10122005.html> 

» Source Watch: Ruder Finn's work for Croatia
<http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ruder_Finn's_work_for_Croatia> 

» Partial transcript of James Harff's comments to Jacques Morlino
<http://www.greens.org/s-r/20/20-24.html> 

» National Post: International Media Under Attack in Serbia
<http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9811&L=twatch-l&D=1&F=P&O
=D&P=20003> 

» George Kenney: Kosovo: On Ends and Means
<http://www.thenation.com/doc/19991227/kenney> 

» George Kenney: Steering Clear of Balkan Shoals
<http://listserv.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9811&L=twatch-l&D=1&F=P&O=D&P=
20746> 

» George Kenney: A Premature Death
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08839.html> 

» Michael Parenti: The Rational Destruction of Yugoslavia
<http://www.michaelparenti.org/yugoslavia.html> 

» Michael Parenti: The Media and their Atrocities
<http://www.michaelparenti.org/MediaAtrocities.html> 

» Michael Parenti: The Demonization of Slobodan Milosevic
<http://www.michaelparenti.org/Milosevic.html> 

» Ruder Finn: Official Site <http://www.ruderfinn.com/default.asp?bhcp=1> 


 


                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [email protected]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to