Bosnian Serb general says British counterpart was "biased" 10 November 2007 | 
19:26 | Source: SENSE THE HAGUE -- The trial of seven former Bosnian Serbs 
charged with war crimes in Srebrenica continued at the Hague. 

Milan Gvero’s defense accused General Rupert Smith, who commanded the UN 
troops, or UNPROFOR in Bosnia in 1995, of being pro-Muslim. 

The defense of Gvero, Mladić’s former assistant for morale in the Bosnian Serb 
Army (VRS) General Staff, cross-examined Smith Friday at the Hague Tribunal, in 
an effort to prove that the British general was pro-Muslim, acting against the 
Bosnian Serbs. 

David Josse, Gvero’s British defense counsel, pointed at several documents and 
passages from The Art of War in the Modern World, a book Smith wrote. 

According to the defense, they demonstrate that the general was in regular 
contact with the Bosniak military and political leaders, while his meeting with 
the Bosnian Serb representatives were irregular, to say the least. 

The British general confirmed this, explaining that the Bosnian Serbs were to 
blame. 

"We often asked to meet with the Bosnian Serbs, but our requests were turned 
down," Smith told the court. 

According to his assessment, military and political leaders of Republic of 
Srpska could have met UNPROFOR representatives more often, had they wanted to 
do so. 

But Gvero’s defense counsel implied that the British general had taken a "too 
personal" stand in some situations, especially towards Mladić. 

An example of this was Smith’s refusal to communicate in any possible way with 
Mladić in June 1995. His superior, French General Janvier, had to do it 
instead. 

Smith did not deny his decision was personal. But, he explained, the decision 
came because Mladić’s troops held UNPROFOR troops as hostages. 

"I didn’t want to weaken my position by talking to someone who held my men 
hostage," Smith said. He was not opposed to contacts with Bosnian Serbs, but 
thought that it was "not his job to do it." 

Finally, Josse reminded the court that General Smith was on vacation on the 
Croatina island of Korčula when Mladic’s troops attacked Srebrenica. 

He cut his holiday short to attend a meeting in Geneva, but instead of heading 
back to his HQ in Sarajevo, he returned to Korčula. 

Josse put it to the British general that he himself had decided to continue his 
vacation, and that he had not been instructed to do so by his superiors, as he 
said in his evidence. 

The defense counsel accused the British general of trying to lay the blame on 
his superiors for this "important and wrong decision." 

Admitting that the final decision had been his, Smith did not agree with the 
defense about shifting the blame. 

"I can’t see what anyone could be blamed for," he concluded. 

The trial, known as the Srebrenica Seven, continues on Monday, November 19. 

*       Comments: 5 
*        <http://www.b92.net/eng/news/comments.php?nav_id=45286#hrono> 
Chronological 
*        <http://www.b92.net/eng/news/comments.php?nav_id=45286#rating> 
Recommended 
*       Send your <http://www.b92.net/eng/news/your_comment.php?nav_id=45286>  
comment 

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/crimes-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=11&dd=10&nav_id=45286

Reply via email to