http://www.economist.com/index.html

Bosnia and Kosovo

The game of the name

Dec 6th 2007 | BRUSSELS
>From The Economist print edition

Balkan diplomacy at NATO and the EU

 

 

WESTERN institutions may look frayed and indecisive to their own members,
but to those wanting to join them they can seem mighty effective. Just look
at the impact of the European Union (EU) on Bosnia. Since April 2006 the
fragile state stitched together by outside powers more than a decade ago has
seemed to be accelerating towards disaster. Amid media reports of
disintegration and renewed conflict, gloomy Bosnians began stockpiling oil
and sugar. Not any more.

On December 4th, the EU initialled a stabilisation and association agreement
with Bosnia after setting aside a row over police reform. This first step on
the long road to EU membership was the cause of general rejoicing. “The mood
has changed completely, people are much more optimistic,” says Osman
Topcagic, the Bosnian official in charge of EU integration. 

The turnaround has been swift. On October 19th Miroslav Lajcak, the
tough-minded Slovak who serves as the outside world's governor-general in
Bosnia, said that unless politicians changed the rules to stop government
members boycotting meetings, he would impose the change anyway. 

 

That nonplussed Bosnia's Serbs, masters of the no-show tactic, who have been
stroppily hinting they might seek independence on the same lines as nearby
Kosovo. That mainly Albanian province is preparing to declare independence
from Serbia next year, after negotiations on its future are formally
declared dead next week. 

Given the nervousness across the region—Russia opposes independence but much
of the West supports it—one would have hoped that NATO could also pour some
soothing balm. Kosovo's southern neighbours, Albania and Macedonia (which
has a large Albanian minority), are strong candidates to gain invitations to
join the alliance at its Bucharest summit in April. But Greek objections to
its northern neighbour's “monopoly” of the Macedonian name, which is shared
by a large chunk of northern Greece, must be met first. 

Greece says it wants a final resolution of the dispute that has lain dormant
for years, or it will veto the NATO invitation. The fact that Macedonia
plans to introduce new licence plates emblazoned with “Macedonia” has not
helped. Greece has suggested its neighbour call itself something like “New
Macedonia”. The government in Skopje offers to join as the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), a mouthful it uses in some international
forums. 

Not enough, says the Greek foreign minister, Dora Bakoyiannis, “FYROM is not
a serious name”. Quite so. But stirring the warm coals of the Balkans is
hardly serious either.

 

Reply via email to