Serbian victory for Putin and Russia Inc

By Quentin Peel 

Published: January 25 2008 02:11 | Last updated: January 25 2008 02:11

Russia will reap its first big reward on Friday for supporting Serbia in trying 
to stop Kosovo from declaring unilateral independence. Next week the European 
Union may suffer a serious reverse for doing 
<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a74d7bca-caa8-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html>  the 
opposite, if Serbia elects a hardline nationalist president. The price of 
Kosovo’s freedom is high.

Gazprom <http://markets.ft.com/tearsheets/performance.asp?s=ru:GAZP> , the 
Russian state-controlled gas monopoly, is to acquire a majority shareholding in 
NIS, the Serbian state oil monopoly, and in return incorporate the former 
Yugoslav republic into its proposed South Stream gas pipeline that will run 
under the Black Sea via Bulgaria to Greece and Italy.

The deal has already been approved by the Belgrade government, although the 
price to be paid for NIS has not been finalised. Whatever happens, Gazprom will 
get a bargain, as well as a customer for South Stream rather than the rival 
Nabucco pipeline project, intended to reduce EU dependence on Russian gas, 
without having to submit to any competitive bidding process.

What has Russia done to deserve such favourable treatment? It has blocked a 
resolution in the United Nations Security Council to endorse Kosovo’s 
independence. That will not stop the process, but it makes it much more 
difficult for other countries to grant the future state formal recognition. 
Although the US and most EU states will recognise it de facto, Kosovo will be 
left in a sort of legal limbo.

That suits President Vladimir Putin in three ways.

First, he is profoundly opposed to any process of national self-determination 
that allows a country such as Kosovo to declare independence unilaterally, 
rather than by agreement with the country from which it is separating. Today’s 
Russia, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, is determined not to allow any 
other of its constituent parts to break away. That is why Moscow fought two 
bloody wars in Chechnya. Although Mr Putin hints that breakaway regions such as 
Abkhazia – part of Georgia, not Russia – might follow Kosovo, all the evidence 
suggests he wants nothing of the kind.

Second, he can exploit differences between EU members and the US. He knows that 
countries such as Spain, Greece and Cyprus hate the idea of self-determination, 
fearing it might be copied by Basque separatists or Turkish Cypriots. They are 
very unhappy about the precedent to be set by Kosovo.

Best of all for the Kremlin, however, is the third benefit: the sweetheart deal 
for Gazprom. Its strongest supporter in Belgrade is Vojislav Kostunica, the 
prime minister, because he thinks Russia deserves a reward. Serbia also needs 
the gas.

Mr Kostunica got his way in cabinet this week because the pro-EU party in the 
government, the Democratic party of President Boris Tadic, desperately needs 
his backing to help Mr Tadic win the second round of the ongoing presidential 
election. In the first round last Sunday he trailed behind Tomislav Nikolic, 
nationalist leader of the anti-EU Radical party.

Mr Kostunica is notorious for not showing his hand. Mr Nikolic may very well 
end up winning the run-off on February 3. That would be a disaster for EU 
relations with the most important country in the western Balkans.

Analysts in Moscow say Mr Putin might prefer Mr Tadic to win. He does not want 
to do business with an isolated Serbia. They dismiss suggestions that Russia’s 
opposition to Kosovar independence reflects some sort of Orthodox Christian, 
Slavic solidarity with the Serbs. It is far more likely to be related to the 
Gazprom deal. This is classic behaviour by Russia Inc, a Russian state driven 
by money, not ideology.

There is also a strategic motive, although it is probably secondary. Every 
energy customer won by Gazprom further justifies construction of the South 
Stream gas pipeline rather than the alternative Nabucco pipeline to link 
central Asian suppliers via Turkey to Europe. Nabucco already has problems 
getting enough gas supplies to justify its construction. It will never get them 
without customers. Mr Putin must be laughing all the way to the bank.

Copyright <http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright>  The Financial Times 
Limited 2008

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a78fc2a4-cadb-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html

Reply via email to