To read the entire article, please go to:
http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?q=4750.0.102.0  Stella
  

Misreporting Kosovo

 

>From the  <http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=magazine&q=102> March
2008 Trumpet Print Edition »

How the mainstream press has missed the most important angle on events in
the Balkans. By Brad Macdonald 

 

On back-to-back days in December 1991, the New York Times published articles
highlighting Germany’s alarming and audacious decision to recognize and
legitimize the efforts of Slovenia and Croatia to break away from
Yugoslavia. Both articles were refreshingly honest and held little back in
their analysis of Germany’s seminal role in the violent fragmentation of
Yugoslavia. 

In the second of those two articles, Paul Lewis cited European diplomats who
warned that Germany’s decision to support Croatia and Slovenia, despite
opposition from virtually the rest of the world, “underscored Germany’s
growing political power in the 12-nation European Community.” Germany’s
incursion into the Balkans, wrote Lewis, “has worried many in Europe who see
it as an attempt to re-exert traditional Germanic influences over this area
of the Balkans” (Dec. 16, 1991; emphasis mine throughout). 

Lewis exhibited little reticence in exposing the German undercurrent in what
was unfolding in Yugoslavia, even when it meant connecting Germany’s
decision to recognize Croatia and Slovenia in 1991 to its sordid history
with these entities during World War II. He wrote, “[I]n its unusual
assertiveness in moving ahead with a plan to extend diplomatic recognition
to the breakaway Yugoslav republics of Croatia and Slovenia, Germany has
stirred troubling historical associations …. Nazi Germany dominated the two
Yugoslav regions during World War II, absorbing Slovenia into the Third
Reich and creating a puppet regime in Croatia.” 

A month later, the Times wrote this: “Germany’s decision to press for quick
recognition of the two republics, disregarding appeals from the United
States and the United Nations, marked a new assertiveness that some
Europeans find disconcerting” (Jan. 16, 1992). 

The point? 

Just 16 years ago, a mainstream news organ like the New York Times was not
afraid to report the reality that Germany was manipulating the Balkans in an
effort to “re-exert traditional Germanic influences” over the region. A
willingness to analyze the Balkans through the German prism was plainly
evident. 

How times have changed. 

Missing a Blockbuster Angle 

On Dec. 10, 2007, the deadline for a mutual solution to the Kosovo dilemma
expired, and Kosovo Albanians, led by former terrorist leader Hashim Thaci,
said they would immediately start finalizing their declaration of
independence from Serbia. 

The subject of Kosovo’s independence does not lack coverage. What it lacks
is the kind of fresh, up-front, in-depth reporting practiced by the likes of
the New York Times when it covered Yugoslavia’s dissolution in 1991-92. When
Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia broke away from Yugoslavia in the early 1990s,
the Times didn’t hesitate to declare Germany’s pivotal and alarming role in
the crises (though later, when the U.S. and British governments switched
sides, so too did the Times). 

Now Kosovo may well be on the verge of erupting again, and few people,
certainly not the mainstream press, are talking about Germany’s fundamental
role in this crisis! 

Why not? It’s a blockbuster angle! 

(continued:   http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?q=4750.0.102.0  )

 

Reply via email to