EU pact offer muddies Serbia pre-election waters


Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:00pm EST

 

By Ellie Tzortzi - Analysis

BELGRADE (Reuters) - A vague European Union pact offered to Serbia in the
hope of influencing this weekend's presidential election is more likely to
confuse than swing the vote for the EU's preferred man, analysts say.

Serbia's pro-Western President Boris Tadic faces nationalist challenger
Tomislav Nikolic on Sunday in a tight vote that would decide Serbia's
attitude to the world as it faces an imminent, Western-backed independence
declaration by its Kosovo province.

"This makes practically no difference because Tadic voters are pro-European
anyway, and Nikolic voters are not even thinking about this," said analyst
Aleksandar Vasovic.

"It's only confusing to the average undecided voter, because the message is
not clear."

The EU, appealing to Serbs to vote for a European future, invited Belgrade
on Monday to sign an interim political accord on February7, days after the
decisive poll.

The 27 EU foreign ministers were unable to agree on signing a full
Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with Serbia as the Netherlands
insisted it must first show full cooperation with the U.N. war crimes
tribunal on the former Yugoslavia.

Instead they agreed to sign an interim political agreement on cooperation
covering free trade, visa liberalization and educational exchanges.

EU officials and Tadic's party colleagues such as Foreign Minister Vuk
Jeremic hailed the pact as a "breakthrough" that would "open up doors for
Serbia".

But it fell flat in Serbia, where media and politicians had for weeks taken
the SAA signing for granted. More column inches were dedicated to the
distribution of free shares and star tennis player Novak Djokovic.

Analyst Djordje Vukadinovic said the offer may "just be enough" to help
Tadic win. But not only had Serbia not signed the SAA, even the new pact was
conditioned to after the vote.

"The carrots are getting smaller and more distant," he told Beta news
agency.

LIFELINE

Pollster Marko Blagojevic said it would be hard to tell what effect this
"surrogate" agreement would have on the vote.

"People were promised the SAA will be signed, I don't know how they will
read this interim pact," Blagojevic said. "This is a step to Europe, but not
as big as Serbia had hoped for."

The EU, which is due to take over supervision of Kosovo in coming weeks as a
prelude to recognizing the breakaway province, has made no secret of its
conviction that Tadic is the only man to prevent a nationalist backlash over
the territory's loss.

Belgrade lost control over Kosovo in 1999, when NATO expelled Serb forces to
stop the killings of ethnic Albanian civilians in a counter-insurgency war.
Most Serbs see it as the nation's heartland and find a breakaway
unacceptable.

Aware of the emotional pull of the issue, Brussels has tried to dispel the
impression of meddling, fearful of making Tadic look like a puppet or
leaving him open to charges of treason.

But comments by EU ministers that the accord would not be signed on February
7 if Nikolic was the winner, left no doubt that the offer came with strings
attached.

"A lot of people are turned off by this blatant meddling," said James Lyon,
senior Balkans adviser for the International Crisis Group. "The EU saw this
as throwing Tadic a lifeline, but they could well be throwing him a lead
lifejacket."

(Additional reporting by Ivana Sekularac)

Reply via email to