http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080221.wkosovoletters21
/EmailBNStory/National/home

 


Recognizing Kosovo could backfire for Ottawa, expert says


RHÉAL SÉGUIN 

>From Thursday's Globe and Mail 

February 21, 2008 at 4:40 AM EST

QUEBEC CITY — Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence is a clear
example of how powerless the federal government would be to stop Quebec from
doing the same, according to influential Quebec City lawyer André
Joli-Coeur.

Mr. Joli-Coeur, who 10 years ago made the same argument before the Supreme
Court of Canada in the Quebec secession reference, said that should Ottawa
recognize the declaration of independence of Kosovo, it will have difficulty
refusing Quebec the same status should the province eventually declare its
independence.

"The case of Kosovo clearly demonstrates that the essential factors in the
creation of a state are the will of the population of the territory
concerned and the attitude of the international community," Mr. Joli-Coeur
stated in a letter to The Globe and Mail. "The predecessor state does not
necessarily play a decisive role in such matters."

Recognizing Kosovo independence could one day backfire against Ottawa, he
argued.

"Canada will be reminded of its probable support for the declaration of
independence of Kosovo when the matter of Quebec's sovereignty arises in the
future," he stated.

Mr. Joli-Coeur was appointed "friend of the court" in 1998 by the Supreme
Court to argue Quebec's case in the secession reference referred by Ottawa
in the hope of having an eventual unilateral declaration of independence by
Quebec declared illegal. 

The case involving Kosovo, according to Mr. Joli-Coeur, has shown that
despite Serbia's rejection of the breakaway state's declaration of
independence, the recognition of the new state by major Western countries
rendered that opposition futile. He argued that Ottawa should be reminded of
this fact should it try to stop Quebec secession by invoking the Clarity
Act, a law that gives the federal government powers to define a "clear
question" in a referendum and the "clear majority" needed to separate.

In 1998, the Supreme Court ruled that the Quebec government would be within
its rights to declare secession. "The rights of the other provinces and the
federal government cannot deny the right of the government of Quebec to
pursue secession, should a clear majority of the people of Quebec choose
that goal, so long as in doing so, Quebec respects the rights of others,"
the court stated in its advisory opinion on Quebec's right to secede
unilaterally.

Prior to the 1995 referendum on sovereignty, then-premier Jacques Parizeau
had secured a commitment from France as well as from member states of the
Francophonie to support an eventual unilateral declaration of independence
in the event of a referendum victory.

 

Reply via email to