http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=916448

KINGSTON WHIG-STANDARD (CANADA)

OPINION

Recognition of Kosovo by Canada could backfire
Posted -6 sec ago

While watching the CBC national news last Monday evening, I heard about
Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence from Serbia, and the next
day I read the same news in the Whig-Standard. In addition, the CBC's
Politics show broadcasted comments by a Parti Quebecois member of Quebec's
National Assembly who was delighted about Kosovo's declaration of
independence, and Montenegro's earlier declaration of independence, from
Serbia. This Quebec politician suggested that these two events set
precedents for the future separation of Quebec from Canada.

It appears that people have a very short memory about the history of the
former Yugoslavia. The independence of Montenegro and the declaration of
independence by Kosovo are unrelated events. Kosovo was a province of Serbia
for at least the last 600 years, whereas Montenegro was an independent state
for most of that time.

After the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria at Sarajevo
in 1914, the then-Kingdom of Serbia received an ultimatum from the
Austro-Hungarian Empire. With the threat of a possible war with a major
European power, then-King Nikolaus of Montenegro proposed a voluntary
federation with Serbia. After the end of the First World War, the victorious
Western European alliance rewarded Serbia with territories from the defeated
Austro-Hungarian and Turkish empires, Macedonia, Slovenia, Croatia and
Bosnia-Herzegovina, with Montenegro remaining a voluntary member - and thus
Yugoslavia, or the South Slav Kingdom, was formed.

After gaining its independence from the Turkish Empire, nearby Albania
remained a poverty-stricken country. A series of "strong man" rulers
mismanaged the country and its economy. During the early days of Yugoslavia,
Albanians began illegally crossing the border into neighbouring Montenegro,
Kosovo and Macedonia, a movement of people that has continued up to the
present day.

After the Second World War, Yugoslavia's government under President Josip
Broz Tito for some reason tolerated these illegal immigrants from Albania
instead of deporting them back to Albania. One reason could be that Albania
was then ruled by Enver Hoxha, a Stalinist dictator and an opponent of Tito
who was helping the Soviet Union's dictator to bring Yugoslavia back under
Soviet control. Later, Tito granted some citizenship rights and limited
autonomy to the illegal residents from Albania who were living in Kosovo.

During the breakup of Yugoslavia under President Slobodan Milosevic, it was
these illegal residents from Albania and their descendants who started
insurgencies in Montenegro, Kosovo and Macedonia and terrorized the local
populations. These terrorist insurgents had a plan for a greater Albania,
with part of Montenegro, Kosovo and Macedonia included in it. They acted
against the advice of Kosovar Albanian politicians. Later, these moderate
politicians lost an election organized under the supervision of NATO and the
European Union to organizers of the insurgencies. The current prime minister
of Kosovo was the leader of a terror campaign against the local indigenous
populations of Montenegro, Kosovo and Macedonia.

Montenegro joined voluntarily with Serbia in a federation in 1914. Hence it
had a right of cession from Serbia, and Serbia reluctantly accepted this
separation. The situation of Kosovo is different and not comparable to that
of Montenegro, and by recognizing the independence of Kosovo, Canada would
be rewarding illegal immigrants, insurgents and terrorists, thereby creating
a dangerous precedent.

Let us consider two different scenarios:

1) The United States is now faced with illegal immigrants from Mexico and
other Latin American countries flooding into U.S. border states. By numbers
they constitute a majority in some southern regions of the U.S. They remain
separate linguistically and culturally, and local authorities are starting
to provide them with services in their own language now. These newly arrived
illegal residents are not going to assimilate into the mainstream population
of the U.S., and they will not be part of the American melting pot. Fifty
years from now, they and their descendants will be demanding to join Mexico
or to become a separate, independent state. Whether the U.S. would allow
this to happen peacefully remains to be seen. This could be another Kosovo
waiting to happen.

2) In Canada, Alberta is an energy- rich province. It is envied by our
neighbour to the south, and secretly coveted by it as well. Quiet population
movements from south of our border to Alberta could change the demography of
the province so that American illegal immigrant would become a majority. A
few years later, they could demand to separate from Canada and join their
motherland, and gain tacit support from Washington in an armed insurgency.

Recognition of Kosovo is like a double-edged sword. We should remember what
future generation of Canadians could face at some time to come.

Tarun Roy Kingston

Reply via email to