http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41393

INTER PRESS SERVICE

Kosovo: How a 'Success Story' Became Such a Mess
By Apostolis Fotiadis

PRISTINA, Feb 28 (IPS) - After the unilateral declaration of independence by
Kosovo on Feb. 17, ethnic tensions are rising dangerously again in the
region, especially in Northern Kosovo and the other Serbian enclaves
scattered around the province.

Daily protests in northern Mitrovica, an area with an ethnic Serb majority,
the attacks on border checkpoints Jarinje and Brnjak by thousands of Serbs,
and regular damaging of buildings and vehicles used by United Nations staff
indicate a Serb determination to counteract the proclaimed independence of
Kosovo.

But there is something more than raw anger that cultivates tensions in this
case. A senior member of the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), and a
customs official, both told IPS on condition of anonymity that UNMIK's
serious incapacities in administering post-independence Kosovo, and the
organised disobedience by the Serbs point to gloom prospects for Kosovo's
future.

The customs official said the civil disobedience in Northern Mitrovica is
radicalising Serbs in Kosovo and keeping the atmosphere tense.

"The most important development is that for some time already the Serbian
Kosovo Police (KPS) personnel have been disobeying orders coming from the
central police authority in Pristina," he said. KPS is the multi-ethnic
police force of Kosovo that deploys both Serbian and Albanian officers.

"Replacing them with Albanian officers is impossible, as well as releasing
them from duty, because you need police presence," he said. The security
vacuum is causing concern to UNMIK leaders who see their control over Kosovo
fading rapidly.

According to resolution 1244 passed by the U.N. Security Council in June
1999, UNMIK was the supreme administrative authority for facilitating the
process of defining Kosovo's status.

After unilateral independence UNMIK is supposed to have fulfilled its role.
After a 120-day transitional period following the declaration of
independence, it will be formally replaced, and practically incorporated, by
the International Civilian Office (ICO) led by the European Union. ICO will
supervise the legislative work of Kosovo's government and the implementation
of the Ahtisaari Package.

The package, named after United Nations special envoy Martti Ahtisaari, who
mediated negotiations for the status of Kosovo between Belgrade and Pristina
until their collapse in December 2007, was the basis for a draft UN Security
Council Resolution which proposed "supervised independence" for the
province. Serbian leaders in Belgrade have rejected the plan though it
provides for a decentralisation of powers along ethnic lines that would
allow the Serbian population to retain control over their own communities
all over Kosovo.

According to the plan, new legislation is valid only if ratified by the
supervising international authority. However, as the U.N. official told IPS,
"after independence the government has already introduced ten laws without
seeking the supervisor's validation. In an internally circulated letter the
PM Hashim Thaci is telling UNMIK that the authority to sign new legislation
falls on the elected president of Kosovo."

International authorities have not reacted to this. The reason is that legal
complications have rendered unclear where responsibilities lie between UNMIK
and the ICO.

The Thaci administration still remains committed to implementing the
Ahtisaari Package. But Visar Ymer, political analyst at the popular Albanian
activist organisation 'Self-Determination' believes that decentralisation
undermines independence itself.

"Implementation of the Ahtisaari Package will pave the way for a future
frozen conflict in Kosova," he told IPS. "The declared state will be
non-functional territorially in the future since the Serbian municipalities
formed according to it will remain linked to Belgrade's parallel structures.
The plan foresees the involvement of Serbia in local politics, but in a new
way."

The 'parallel structures' are the maintenance of educational, welfare and
security structures, and financial support offered to Serbians who remained
in the province after 1999.

They have been used as a vehicle from Belgrade to preserve its influence in
the area and make sure that Kosovo Serbs do not integrate into Kosovo's
state structures.

While UNMIK attempts to downplay the importance of recent developments,
people are becoming increasingly aware how dangerous the complications might
become.

UNMIK head Joachim Rucker was asked during a visit to the Serbian enclave of
Gracanica, 10 kilometres south of Pristina, whether "after losing control
over northern Kosovo, you are going to lose the enclaves as well."

Such Serbian moves could provoke retaliation from Albanian militants, so far
calm.

Hasim Thaci has stated that "Kosovo borders are the most secure in the
region." This provoked Milan Ivanovic, leader of the Serbian National
Council that maintains strong political control over northern Kosovo and the
enclaves, to say that in the areas populated by Serbian majorities, Kosovo's
leadership "can implement their presence only by force." He said such action
would result in widespread violence. (END/2008)

Reply via email to