Truth about Serbia



Monday, March 2, 2009


 


The Tuesday Op-Ed, "A separate take from
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/themes/?Theme=Serbia> Serbia" by William
Walker, deeply shocked me due to its lack of impartiality and its
maliciousness and/or ignorance.


Claiming that basically nothing has changed in Serbia regarding
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/themes/?Theme=Kosovo> Kosovo since the era
of the late
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/themes/?Theme=Slobodan+Milosevic> Slobodan
Milosevic is not only simply false, but also represents an outrageous
fabrication. It was the democratic opposition that toppled Mr. Milosevic in
a democratic revolution in October 2000 and sent him to The Hague. The
leaders of this revolution have been democratically re-elected in several
elections to lead Serbia on its European path toward democracy and having
the highest respect for human rights.

In the negotiations over the status of Kosovo, Serbia had offered Kosovo
autonomy over and above any similar arrangements that exist in multiethnic
states throughout the world. That these negotiations ended with a unilateral
declaration of independence by Albanian leaders in Kosovo, bypassing the
U.N. Security Council in spite of the standing U.N. Resolution 1244, is a
travesty of international law and a dangerous precedent that will inflame
secessionist movements throughout the world.

As to the question of where was Serbian President Boris Tadic during the
Milosevic years, let me point out that he was in the opposition from the
very first day to the very end of the Milosevic regime. I am a witness to
that, as I went through it all myself. On the eve of the revolution, a
warrant was issued for Mr. Tadic's arrest for instigating a workers' strike
against the regime. All of this is well-known and should receive due
acknowledgment and respect. What is maybe less known is that as a young man,
Mr. Tadic was interrogated, arrested and sentenced to jail for defending the
human rights of Albanians among others.

The impartiality of Mr. Walker has been questioned over the years, not least
because of what has been perceived as his rush to judgement in the Racak
case that led to the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999. His op-ed can only add
support to doubts concerning his impartiality.

IVAN VUJACIC

Ambassador of Serbia to the United States

Washington

 
<http://license.icopyright.net/3.7280?icx_id=/news/2009/mar/02/truth-about-s
erbia/> [Get Copyright Permissions]
<http://license.icopyright.net/3.7280?icx_id=/news/2009/mar/02/truth-about-s
erbia/> Click here for reprint permissions! 
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC 

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/02/truth-about-serbia/

<<~WRD000.jpg>>

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to