Serbia to Debate Srebrenica Apology

By REUTERS


Published: March 29, 2010


Filed at 7:42 a.m. ET 

 

BELGRADE/SARAJEVO (Reuters) - Serbia will reopen one of the most painful 
chapters in its recent past this week when parliament starts debating whether 
to apologise for the killing of thousands of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica in 
1995. 

The debate comes after Serbia firmly set its sights on joining the European 
Union 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_union/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
  and will highlight Belgrade's efforts to come to terms with the horrors 
carried out in the name of Serbs during the 1990s wars -- which many in Serbia 
still deny. 

"The Srebrenica resolution is necessary to discuss in parliament because with 
this Serbia wants to demonstrate our desire to move to regional reconciliation 
and demonstrate good neighbourly relations among the countries in the region," 
Prime Minister Mirko Cvetkovic told Reuters last week. 

The draft resolution expresses sympathy for victims and apologises for not 
doing enough to prevent the massacre, carried out by Bosnian Serbs and Serbian 
paramilitaries, although it does not call the killings genocide. 

It will be debated Tuesday and voting could be the same day. The text also 
urges other former Yugoslav countries to pass resolutions condemning crimes 
against Serbs. 

A few months before the end of the war that followed the collapse of 
Yugoslavia, Bosnian Serb forces commanded by Gen. Ratko Mladic 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/ratko_mladic/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
  killed about 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys from the town of Srebrenica, 
which had been besieged and overrun. 

The EU has made the capture and extradition of Mladic to the United Nations 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
  war crimes tribunal a condition for progress in Belgrade's accession bid. 
Many people believe he is hiding in Serbia. 

In 2009, a European Parliament 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_parliament/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
  resolution condemned the Srebrenica massacre as genocide and called on the 
region to commemorate its July anniversary. 

The Serbian text, likely to pass as it is backed by the ruling coalition, is 
important to some investors as well as the EU. 

"There are a good number of investors who won't care one way or the other, but 
for some investors this resolution may well be a signal that the worst is 
clearly over and Serbia is willing to move on," said Daniel Serwer, who was a 
U.S. special envoy to Bosnia in 1995. 

LITTLE COMFORT 

A Serbian apology would be little comfort for Bosnian Muslims like Ilijas 
Pilav, a Sarajevo surgeon who survived the July 1995 attack by escaping through 
the woods. Along with thousands of other Muslim men and boys, he had trekked 
for six days and nights through wilderness before reaching safety. 

"This was an experience that no words can describe," he told Reuters. "It has 
left deep traces on the rest of my life and no amount of time and no political 
declaration can ease those memories." 

Pilav said a Serbian parliament resolution that does not call the crime 
genocide would only add insult to injury. 

"It only deepens the feeling of the humiliation, contempt and anger," he said. 
"Nobody can bring back the dead but those alive shouldn't be humiliated 
either." 

He said the resolution was a dishonest way for the European Union to "amnesty 
Serbia for its wartime role and show it has become an eligible partner." 

Yet apologising, even without the word genocide, is not easy in a country where 
the Socialists of wartime leader Slobodan Milosevic 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/slobodan_milosevic/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
  are a minority coalition partner. Many deputies and ordinary Serbs would 
prefer to highlight Serb war suffering. 

"They feel with passion that no one recognizes the losses the Serbs suffered in 
Bosnia or the crimes committed against them," said former U.S. Ambassador to 
Serbia Bill Montgomery. "This is why any resolution which just focuses on the 
Srebrenica massacre runs into trouble." 

Some liberal Serbs say the resolution is important most of all for Serbs 
themselves to come to terms with a past that transformed their country from the 
envy of the socialist world into a laggard years away from joining the European 
Union. 

"We started the madness," said Milan Pajevic, a former foreign policy advisor 
to the Serbian government. "It is shameful, really shameful. We have to express 
sorrow for the crimes done by the people coming from Serbia, and then, only 
then, could we expect others to say they feel sorry." 

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/03/29/world/international-uk-serbia-massacre.html?_r=1

_______________________________________________
News mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.antic.org/mailman/listinfo/news

Reply via email to