- - - American Airlines United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby raised eyebrows in the aviation industry after talking about a merger with American Airlines during a conversation with members of the Trump administration. But American says itâs not happening anytime soon. The Fort Worth, Texas-based company released a statement Friday about the matter. âAmerican Airlines is not engaged with or interested in any discussions regarding a merger with United Airlines,â the company said in a statement. Any deal would have a major impact on Charlotteâs airport and other busy terminals around the world, according to experts. Fort Worth-based American Airlines accounts for 90% of flights at Charlotte Douglas International Airport. Ben Mutzabaugh, managing editor for aviation at The Points Guy, a travel website covering passenger services, said it would be an unprecedented move but strategically fascinating. âItâs hard to take seriously, because it sure would go against pretty much every past precedent weâve had in the aviation industry ... it would be like Pepsi buying Coke, or NBC buying CBS,â Mutzabaugh said. United declined to comment on the rumor. It was originally pitched by Kirby to President Donald Trump as a way to compete with foreign carriers. The meeting was held in late February and just three days before the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, Reuters reported. That drove jet fuel prices sharply higher and prompted airlines to raise fares and fees to offset the added costs. John Strong, a professor of finance and economics at William & Mary, believes Kirby was floating an idea and attributes it partly to his history with American Airlines, where he served as president. âI think (Scott Kirby) has always felt that he could do a better job running American ... the United CEO knows the American system in every detail,â Strong said. American said in its statement changes in the broader airline marketplace may be necessary, but a combination with United would be negative for competition and consumers. The airline also said it would be inconsistent with its understanding of the administrationâs philosophy toward the industry and antitrust laws. âOur focus will remain on executing on our strategic objectives and positioning American to win for the long term,â the airline stated. The airline said it looks forward to continuing to work with the administration as it takes steps to strengthen the broader airline industry, according to the statement. Peter Schwarz, an emeritus professor of economics at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, finds it unusual that the company publicly âpoured cold waterâ on the idea by citing consumer harm â a role usually reserved for regulators, not companies. âThe role of the company is to try to earn profits,â Schwarz said. âBut I guess perhaps they see that this is a futile effort, and so they decided to go with the public relations angle. I think itâs kind of an unusual position for the airline to take. But personally, Iâm glad they took that, because I would not like to see this merger.â A Charlotte âfortress hubâ obstacle One of the primary hurdles to such a deal is the âfortress hubâ factor. Major airlines typically dominate specific geographic hubs. For example, Delta rules Atlanta, while United maintains a stronghold in cities such as Newark, New Jersey. Merging American and United could create a massive âbehemothâ that regulators and competitors would likely find impossible to stomach, Mutzabaugh added. If a merger were to occur, CLT would be a significant prize for United. It would provide the Chicago-based carrier with a dominant hub in the Southeast, a region where it currently holds only about 2% market share. However, growth would come with steep regulatory hurdles. Even if federal authorities approved the deal, they would likely force the new airline to give up gates and takeoff slots at crowded airports. Mutzabaugh noted that political pushback is almost certain. âI would imagine that you would have some members of Congress and some politicians in the Carolinas who would be a little uncomfortable about how dominant [the airline] would be,â Mutzabaugh said. CLT is currently a major hub for the Southeast and a major alternative to Atlanta, Strong added. United would take advantage of this âspider networkâ as a way to compete aggressively with Delta, which dominates Atlanta. And with a brand-new terminal opening at Washington Dulles later this year, United would have the capacity to move Charlotteâs international gateways to D.C. âI would expect Charlotte to become a secondary operation in terms of â itâd still be a hub, but it wouldnât be a hub like it is now,â Strong said. The impact on Charlotte travelers With Charlotte already a monopoly-like market, Mutzabaugh doubts other airlines would want those leftover gates. Competing against a carrier that is dominant on its home turf would be challenging. For customers, the trade-off would be a mix of convenience and cost. That includes an unmatched flight schedule, with the potential to make Charlotte even busier than it is now. CLT ranked seventh in the world for aircraft operations in Airports Council Internationalâs preliminary 2025 list â down one spot from 2024. The airport recorded 574,193 aircraft operations, a 4% decline from 2024 and a 7% increase compared to 2023, according to CLT. But for passengers who hate busy airports, another downside is higher prices compared with competitive airports like Raleigh-Durham, which is not dominated by a single carrier. âYour schedule would probably be as good as it could possibly get if youâre an air traveler based in Charlotte,â Mutzabaugh said. âThe downside ... your pricing power as a consumer would go away.â Hal Singer, an antitrust economist from consulting firm Econ One, said federal officials donât just look at total airport dominance, but route dominance as well. Even if a merger doesnât create a total monopoly, moving from three competitors to two on specific routes may become an issue. âWhat drives (the agencies) insane ... gets their hair up is if you take a route that was served by two and after the merger goes to one â they call this âmerger to monopoly.ââ That would give them power to raise prices, and it would impact employees as well. âUnited and American might have to compete on wages right now,â Singer said. âIf you were to eliminate one of them, that would mean that workers would be in a less favorable position. They wouldnât be able to bargain.â An uncertain deal If combined, the two airlines would have 40% of the domestic market, CNBC reported. âThis would be the biggest of all time. I canât even see the slightest chance that a court would allow it,â George Hay, a law professor at Cornell University, told CNBC. Mutzabaugh shared similar thoughts. âIâve learned to never say never, but itâs hard to imagine,â Mutzabaugh said. ©2026 The Charlotte Observer. Visit charlotteobserver.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. | | | | | | | | | | | Welcome to Tribune Content Agency - Tribune Content Agency | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------- You are receiving Jack Keady's American Airlines Aviation News * To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time, OR make changes to your subscription, please visit: http://keady.news/info * You may reach Jack Keady at: [email protected] * View the LIST ARCHIVE at: http://keady.news/archive
