There is some problem with our GhostScript 6.53 not doing the 
anti-aliased mode of gv. Turn off "Antialias" in the "State" menu and 
your page will get visible. You can save this setting in "State"/"gv 
Options" dialog.

The Acrobat Reader problem is really strange, can you print into a file 
also from acroread and look at the resulting file with gv? For me it 
does not look like a printer driver issue.

    Till


Tech At Mathco Dot Com wrote:

> gv doesn't seem to want to preview the .ps nore .pdf files. complains
> about 'unknown device x11alpha'. Acrobat reader 4 shows the page
> fine but when printing it out it wants to use 'lpr', everything comes
> out ok except all ' ' (spaces) is filled in with a S looking character
> (looks like a S with a tail not sure how to reproduce the character on
> the keyboard). Can it be the problem that I'm using cups as the print
> system and the program wants to use lpr insted?
> 
> /MattB
> 
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 19:28, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> 
>>Print into a file and try to display the file with "gv". I fyou see the 
>>problem also on the screen, the problem is caused by the PostScript 
>>generation of Evolution or GNOME, if the screen output is correct, it is 
>>caused by GhostScript or the printer driver.
>>
>>    Till
>>
>>
>>Tech At Mathco Dot Com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It seems to be a problem with the fonts spacing when printing
>>>from Calandar Appointments from Evolution 1.0.2.
>>>
>>>What happens is. everything comes out fine except the
>>>From and to time
>>>
>>>for example Fri 02/22/2002 01:30 pm to Fri 02/22/2002 03:30pm
>>>
>>>It seems this font is either too big or the spacing is not big enough
>>>and the letters get printed into eachother. The preview looks
>>>just fine. So my question is.. Is this a known problem with
>>>Evolution? It doesn't do this anywhere else.
>>>
>>>My printer is HP Deskjet 970c and i use cups driver with gimp support.
>>>I also tried the recommended HP driver, but with the same result.
>>>
>>>Anything i can try?
>>>
>>>/MattB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to