Do you have the drakfirewall/shorewall running on the client? If so, 
either turn it off (the server's firewall should protect your network) 
or open port 631/printing/CUPS in the client's drakfirewall configuration.

    Till


Damon Lynch wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 03:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:
>     Can you open printing (CUPS, port 631) in the drakfirewall configuration 
>     and see whether you server sees the client's printer then?
>     
>         Till
> 
> Hi Till,
> 
> after a suggestion from Florin this is in /etc/shorewall/rules:
> 
> ACCEPT  masq    fw      tcp    
> domain,bootps,631,imap,pop3,http,https,111      -
> ACCEPT  masq    fw      udp    
> domain,bootps,631,imap,pop3,http,https,111      -
> 
> 
> Although the printer is now detected, I cannot print a test page or copy
> it to openoffice.org.  Here is an example of trying to add it to
> openoffice.org, /var/log/messages:
> 
> Sep 13 22:39:38 damon printerdrake[27634]: running: /usr/bin/curl -o
> /etc/foomatic/Printer.ppd http://192.168.0.252:631/printers/Printer.ppd
> Sep 13 22:39:38 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
> SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0
> DF PROTO=TCP SPT=36257 DPT=631 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 
> Sep 13 22:39:38 damon printerdrake[27634]: removed files/directories
> /etc/foomatic/Printer.ppd
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something really obvious?  Trying to print a test page
> was interesting -- it seems like cups is quite persistent, as I've got
> an awful lot of these :-) --
> 
> Sep 14 00:09:11 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
> SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
> ID=18959 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=37331 DPT=631 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 
> 
> 
> Damon
> 
>     
>     Damon Lynch wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     > 
>     > Using the packages suggested by Florin earlier today to test Internet
>     > connection sharing (which now works for me), printerdrake when run from
>     > the server still cannot find a local printer on a client.  Cups is
>     > running on both machines.
>     > 
>     > I'm no expert on this but it appears printerdrake is looking for
>     > machines on the LAN that are running CUPS, e.g. here is an example of
>     > starting printerdrake, refreshing the printer list, and running the
>     > wizard a few times:
>     > 
>     > [root@damon damon]# printerdrake 
>     > cupsd (pid 6501) is running...
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > rmmod: module parport_probe is not loaded
>     > modprobe: Can't locate module parport_probe
>     > modprobe: Can't locate module parport_probe
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > rmmod: module parport_probe is not loaded
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > WARNING: pinging broadcast address
>     > 
>     > and then this is seen in /var/log/messages:
>     > 
>     > [root@damon damon]# tail /var/log/messages 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:20 damon printerdrake[7867]: running: /sbin/modprobe -n
>     > parport_probe
>     > Sep 13 11:25:23 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=
>     > MAC=00:00:21:04:60:8c:00:80:ad:77:a2:9b:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.252
>     > DST=192.168.0.1 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62838 PROTO=ICMP
>     > TYPE=0 CODE=0 ID=39967 SEQ=256 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:23 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>     > SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=112 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=255
>     > ID=43371 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=192.168.0.252 DST=192.168.0.1
>     > LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62838 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=0 CODE=0
>     > ID=39967 SEQ=256 ] 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:26 damon printerdrake[7867]: running: rmmod parport_probe
>     > Sep 13 11:25:28 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=
>     > MAC=00:00:21:04:60:8c:00:80:ad:77:a2:9b:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.252
>     > DST=192.168.0.1 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62839 PROTO=ICMP
>     > TYPE=0 CODE=0 ID=29472 SEQ=256 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:28 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>     > SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=112 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=255
>     > ID=43372 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=192.168.0.252 DST=192.168.0.1
>     > LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62839 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=0 CODE=0
>     > ID=29472 SEQ=256 ] 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:33 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=
>     > MAC=00:00:21:04:60:8c:00:80:ad:77:a2:9b:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.252
>     > DST=192.168.0.1 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62840 PROTO=ICMP
>     > TYPE=0 CODE=0 ID=34848 SEQ=256 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:33 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>     > SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=112 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=255
>     > ID=43373 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=192.168.0.252 DST=192.168.0.1
>     > LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62840 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=0 CODE=0
>     > ID=34848 SEQ=256 ] 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:54 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=
>     > MAC=00:00:21:04:60:8c:00:80:ad:77:a2:9b:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.252
>     > DST=192.168.0.1 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62841 PROTO=ICMP
>     > TYPE=0 CODE=0 ID=42528 SEQ=256 
>     > Sep 13 11:25:54 damon kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>     > SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.252 LEN=112 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=255
>     > ID=43374 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=192.168.0.252 DST=192.168.0.1
>     > LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62841 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=0 CODE=0
>     > ID=42528 SEQ=256 ] 
>     > 
>     > My network is configured like this:
>     > server: two rtl8139: 192.168.0.1 for LAN, static IP for cable, internet
>     > connection sharing configured, nothing checked in drakfirewall
>     > client: davicom9102: DHCP client, printer on parallel port
>     > 
>     > Damon
>     > 
>     > 
>     
>     
>     
>     
> 
> 


Reply via email to