If you are unable to view html within your email program please use the following link 
to view Chuck Muth's latest News and Views: http://chuckmuth.com/newsandviews/nv.cfm
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.chuckmuth.com/remove
X-ListMember: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___________________________________

EXTRA!  EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT...

The House Government Affairs Committee will hear testimony today on �The Supersizing 
of America: The Federal Government's Role in Combating Obesity and Promoting Healthy 
Living.�  The Committee is considering what more, if anything, the federal government 
should be doing.  We kinda wonder why the feds should be doing anything AT ALL on this 
issue.  Read our �Dear Congress� letter to that effect, which we blast-faxed to 
Capitol Hill last night, on today�s News & Views EXTRA page at:  
http://www.chuckmuth.com/newsandviews/nv.cfm
_____________________________________

SUPER-SIZED CLOWN

�If I wanted the fat taken out of my hamburgers, I'd join the granola-munching tofu 
crowd. If some schmuck can't restrain himself enough to turn off the Big Mac tap after 
he's downed 3 or 4 of them, that's his own business. The occasional junk food binge 
shouldn't be denied to anyone else because a clown like (�Super Size Me� filmmaker 
Morgan Spurlock) has a bit of a problem with self-control.�

- Columnist Rachel Marsden, GOPUSA.com, 6/2/04

THIS WEEK�S SURVEY SAYS!

Will the new Medicare prescription drug discount cards be of significant benefit to 
senior citizens once they learn about and start using them?

*  Yes
*  No
*  Not Sure

Cast your vote by clicking the �Survey Says!� tab at www.citizenoutreach.com

MORE ON THE BIG SKY STUPIDITY VIRUS

Our Brushfire Alert yesterday about that government-school principal out in Montana 
who turned in an 11-year-old kid to the cops for turning in an unloaded, broken 
handgun he found caused quite a stir...as it should have. And yes, the police chief 
there should probably have been taken to the woodshed, as well, as many of you 
suggested.  

Anyway, one News & Views reader, a retired government school teacher (naturally), 
wrote me trying to rationalize the behavior of the principal.  Sorry, no way, Jose.  
The woman ratted out a kid who thought she was a responsible adult and authority 
figure.  Nice lesson taught there, huh?

However...what the boy did was, in fact, WRONG.  The way the adults handled it was 
even WORSE, but here�s what the boy SHOULD have done (had he been taught this in the 
first place):  He should have left the gun where it was...and then led a responsible 
adult (or, absent such, his principal) to it.

Now, where have I heard this before?  Hmmm�

Oh, yeah.  I remember.  The NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION!  You see, they have this gun 
safety course for kids called �Eddie Eagle� (http://www.nrahq.org/safety/eddie/).  

�The Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program teaches children in pre-K through third grade four 
important steps to take if they find a gun. These steps are presented by the program's 
mascot, Eddie Eagle, in an easy-to-remember format consisting of the following simple 
rules.�  Those simple rules are...

If you see a gun:
STOP!
Don't Touch.
Leave the Area.
Tell an Adult.

�The program may be readily incorporated into existing school curriculum, taught in a 
one- to five-day format, and used to reach all levels or simply one or two grades,� 
explains the NRA website.  �The purpose of the Eddie Eagle Program isn't to teach 
whether guns are good or bad, but rather to promote the protection and safety of 
children. . . . The Eddie Eagle Program has no agenda other than accident prevention 
-- ensuring that children stay safe should they encounter a gun.�

Does anyone want to bet whether or not the government school in question in Montana 
has allowed the NRA�s Eddie Eagle program to be taught in its classrooms?  Do you 
think maybe it�s time they DID?  And every OTHER government school, as well?  

Don�t hold your breath waiting.

DON�T KNOW MUCH ABOUT HIS-TOR-Y

�From a May 28 report in The Washington Post, we learned that Tiffany Charles got a B 
in history last year but is not sure what year World War II ended. She can't name a 
single general, or one battle. Neither is she able to name the president of the United 
States at the time. 

�...What DOES young Tiffany know? Apparently World War II has gone through the filter 
of political correctness, because Tiffany can tell you about Japanese-Americans who 
were sent to internment camps. . . . Is this what we're getting for record education 
spending: kids who know more about the few wrongs America has committed than they do 
the many rights?  This girl and apparently many others like her in the monopolistic 
government schools aren't learning the truth��

- Columnist Cal Thomas

NAH, THERE�S NO LIBERAL MEDIA BIAS, IS THERE?

�Bush, who avoided combat in Vietnam while serving as a pilot in the Texas Air 
National Guard, calls himself a war president for his re-election campaign against 
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran.�

- From a Reuters news report on President Bush's Memorial Day speech at Arlington 
National Cemetery

KERRY GIVES GREEN BERET THE FINGER

�Ted Sampley, a former Green Beret who served two full tours in Vietnam, spotted 
(John) Kerry and his Secret Service detail at about 9 a.m. Monday morning at the 
(Vietnam Memorial) Wall. Sampley walked up to Kerry, extended his hand and said, 
'Senator, I am Ted Sampley, the head of Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry, and I am 
here to escort you away from the Wall because you do not belong here.'

"At that point, a Secret Service officer told Sampley to back away from Kerry. Sampley 
moved about 6 feet away and opened his jacket to reveal a HANOI JOHN T-shirt. . . . 
Kerry then began talking to a group of schoolchildren. Sampley then showed the T-shirt 
to the children and said, 'Kerry does not belong at the Wall because he betrayed the 
brave soldiers who fought in Vietnam.'

�Just then, Kerry - in front of the schoolchildren, other visitors and Secret Service 
agents - brazenly 'flashed the bird' at Sampley��

- NewsMax.com, 6/1/04

THE TROUBLE WITH W

�According to the latest poll by ABC News and The Washington Post, almost all of Mr. 
Bush's decline in support has come from his base. He is not losing support from 
moderates, nor is Mr. Kerry gaining at his expense. Rather, Mr. Bush is simply losing 
his own people.  I believe this has nothing to do with Iraq. I think it is because 
conservatives have slowly come to the conclusion he is really not one of them. It is 
the cumulative effect of a great many issues dating back to the 2000 campaign. Among 
them: 


������President Bush supported �compassionate conservatism,� which implied unqualified 
conservatism is uncompassionate, as liberals have always charged.

   �� He rammed through Congress an education bill written by Ted Kennedy that did 
almost nothing to improve education. It just threw more money at the problem. And now 
liberals complain he didn't throw enough.

����� He signed a campaign finance �reform� bill that almost all conservatives view as 
blatantly unconstitutional, the Supreme Court's endorsement notwithstanding.

����� He has supported vast increases in domestic spending, including a huge, utterly 
unjustified pork barrel and an unconscionable expansion of Medicare, adding trillions 
of dollars to unfunded U.S. liabilities. And he has asked for more spending on 
ridiculous programs like the National Endowment for the Arts, which ought to be 
abolished, not expanded.

������ Although he twisted arms strenuously to get the Medicare drug bill passed, 
President Bush has done almost nothing to get conservative judges confirmed.

������ He has been ambivalent on trade � some days a free trader, other days a 
protectionist. He has succeeded only in alienating all sides on this issue.

�I could go on. But the point is there are many reasons for conservatives to be upset 
with Mr. Bush that have nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq.  Fortunately for him, John 
Kerry is worse on every one of these issues.�

- Columnist Bruce Bartlett

ROY�S REVENGE A MIXED BAG

�Roy Moore, who was expelled last year as chief justice of Alabama's Supreme Court for 
ignoring a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from a judicial 
building, had a mixed record in electing allies in yesterday's Republican primary. He 
backed four candidates for the state Supreme Court. One, his former aide Tom Parker, 
scored an upset victory over Justice Jean Brown; and another, Circuit Judge Jerry 
Stokes, was able to force a runoff election for another High Court seat. But two other 
Moore-backed candidates fared poorly, as did Philip Jauregui, Mr. Moore's lawyer, who 
received only 13% of the vote in a quixotic challenge to GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus of 
Birmingham whom he criticized for being insufficiently supportive of Mr. Moore.�

- John Fund, Political Diary, 6/2/04

LOSER�S LIMP

At the risk of beating a dead horse, I just can�t let this thing about the Libertarian 
Party go.  Not yet.

An unknown and unfunded candidate, Michael Badnarik, wrested the LP�s presidential 
nomination away from two better-known and better-funded candidates last weekend with 
something like 423 votes (out of a population of, what, 250 million or so?).  To which 
Michael Dixon, the LP�s national chairman, boasted, �I think it is a positive 
statement for our party, it is the American Dream, where a guy can grow up and run for 
president.�

No, it�s not.  

This is the LOSER mentality of the Libertarian Party and the prime reason they don�t 
win races of any significance.  It is NOT the American Dream to merely �run� for 
president.  The American Dream is that anybody can WIN the presidency.  You know, 
actually BECOME the president.  All kinds of kooks and wingnuts �run� for the office 
every four years.  2004 is no exception.  The goofballs are coming out of the 
woodwork...like that Las Vegas piano player, Westclod, or whatever his name is.

The LP has developed a self-defeating mentality that it�s enough to just show up for 
the game (or worse, just sit in the stands and heckle)...not to actually compete in it 
to win.  I hate to say it, but it appears they�ve bought into that self-esteem crap 
the liberals are teaching our kids in the government schools:  �There are no winners 
and no losers; every kid is a winner just by participating.  Now let�s give everybody 
a nice round of applause and make them feel really, really special.�  

Bleeccchhh.

Now, if anyone wants a refresher course on what Americans - REAL Americans who still 
possess that rugged frontier spirit of our forefathers - think about winning, hop into 
the Wayback Machine and relive this particular segment of the opening speech by Gen. 
George Patton in the 1970s film classic, �Patton��

�When you were kids, you all admired the champion marble shooter, the fastest runner, 
the big league ball player, the toughest boxer. Americans love a winner and will not 
tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time. I wouldn�t give a hoot in hell 
for a man who lost and laughed. That�s why Americans have never lost and will never 
lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans.�

Does THAT sound like the attitude of the Libertarian Party?  Yeah, right.  

Look, when the Libertarian Party starts taking WINNING as seriously as 
Patton-Americans, libertarians such as myself might start taking the LP seriously.  
Not until.

TODAY ON THE DISCUSSION BOARD

Heck, why not?  OK folks, what do YOU think of the Libertarian Party?  If you think 
I�m off base, let me have it.  Persuade me and the rest of America that you are truly 
America�s best hope for regaining our constitutionally limited federal government and 
renewing respect for individual rights�and how you intend to get us there.  Or if you 
think the LP has problems over and above even what I�ve written, put it on the table.  
Let it all hang out.  Join the Discussion Board on this subject by surfing over to:  
http://blog.chuckmuth.com/blog/

NOW, IF YOU WANT TO HEAR ABOUT REAL ELECTORAL SUCCESS�

In last week�s DC Confidential, I told you about New Mexico Republican National 
Committeeman Mickey Barnett who...and you ain�t gonna believe this...actually thinks 
that when you�re elected to a party leadership position, you should LEAD...and lead 
your team to VICTORY.  What a concept!  Go figure.

And that means getting involved in GOP primary races to help assure that the 
candidates with the best chance of winning and advancing the party�s philosophy get 
the party nod.

One of Mickey�s ground troops informs us that the candidates in three of the four 
targeted state legislative races Barnett backed won Tuesday night...including taking 
out two �RINO� incumbents!  One of the RINOs, soon to be ex-legislator Bob White, 
blamed (credited?) his defeat on Barnett�s support for his challenger and threatened 
to quit the GOP.  Gee, I sure hope he doesn�t let the door hit him in the butt on the 
way out.

Anyway, congratulations Mickey.

If the LP wants to join the major leagues, they might consider forgetting about 
recruiting more egg-headed philosophy geeks and devote more time to recruiting the 
Mickey Barnett�s of the political world.

WEASEL ALERT

Heck, since I�ve devoted so much time to losers in this issue already, it seems only 
appropriate to check in with our buddy Nathan Tabor, that Clown Prince running for 
Congress in North Carolina 5.

Frankly, it�s just not worth spending much time on his campaign any longer because 
it�s going...well, nowhere.  The kid�s an empty suit and the voters in the district 
have found that out.  However, we can�t let the most recent bit of Tabor campaign 
deception go by without comment.  

The boy sent out a mess of press releases and website announcements recently touting 
again his so-called �Tabor Plan.�  What a crock.  The real TABOR plan is a legislative 
proposal to restrain government.  The letters stand for �Taxpayers Bill of Rights.�  
It was established in Colorado LONG ago; back when Li�l Nate was still trying to steal 
kisses from Betty Sue under the high school bleachers.  It�s a rock-solid plan which 
has helped Colorado immensely in weathering the economic downturn of recent years and 
which is (finally) spreading across the nation.

So what Nathan Tabor has done is craft an economic plan for his campaign based on the 
principles of the Colorado TABOR plan.  Get it?  Tabor...TABOR.  He then gets folks 
who have been long supporters of TABOR to embrace his Tabor-version of the TABOR plan 
and is trying to fool people into thinking he�s some kind of Milton Friedman prodigy 
by confusing and twisting statements by folks over the Tabor/TABOR plan.  

The dictionary definition of this kind of behavior is found under the word �weasel.�

Anyway, the REAL TABOR plan is something you should be pushing your state to 
adopt...and you can get the full skinny on this legislative proposal from the people 
who REALLY invented it by going to the Independence Institute�s website at: 
http://www.i2i.org/TABOR2003.aspx

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Chuck Muth�s News & Views is published by Citizen Outreach, a non-partisan, 501(c)3 
non-profit corporation. The opinions and views expressed in Chuck Muth's News & Views 
reflect those of the writers, editors and columnists therein and do not necessarily 
reflect the opinions of Citizen Outreach, its officers, directors or employees.

Published by: Citizen Outreach
Chuck Muth
Editor/Publisher
611 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, #439
Washington, DC 20003-4303
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE, just go to:  http://www.chuckmuth.com/newsletter/

To be REMOVED, go to:
http://www.chuckmuth.com/remove/default.cfm

Or send your request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To make a secure online contribution to Citizen Outreach, go to the �Donate� page at 
www.citizenoutreach.com.






Reply via email to