BusinessWeek Online
MBA Express 
January 21, 2009


********************
De Beers: A Multifaceted Strategy Shift
Faced with such challenges as new sources of competitions and suspicion about 
conflict diamonds, Gareth Penny had to rethink the basics 
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/c.asp?747883&cf16b2f231665666&1

Five Years to B-School: The Second Year
The path from college to B-school typically takes five years. By Year Two, 
would-be MBAs should have leadership experience, a growing network, and 
high-level math skills
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/c.asp?747883&cf16b2f231665666&2

Community Colleges Get Squeezed
With the economy heading south, enrollments are up and state funding is down, 
leaving many schools in the lurch
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/c.asp?747883&cf16b2f231665666&3

How I Got to B-School
"Most of us go through the same steps...Looking back, three main aspects of the 
process were critical to me."
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/c.asp?747883&cf16b2f231665666&4

For MBAs, a Brave New World
As business models evolve, post-recession MBA jobs will, too, with employers 
looking for well-rounded types with strong leadership skills
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/c.asp?747883&cf16b2f231665666&5


 B-SCHOOL FORUMS
Visit BW Online's interactive forums for wide-ranging discussions about 
management education. Search through over 1,359,000 posts for topics that 
interest you. Join in today! Here are a few samples of recent messages: 

Getting into B-School: What Do You Consider a Safety School? 

From: Alex805
To: ALL 


How do you decide what is and isn't a safety school? One person told me it was 
a school where your "weakest link" (ie. GPA or GMAT) falls within range. Is 
that true?

Alex 
------------
From: Omne
To: Alex805 


Safety schools for MBA seem a bit different than safety schools for 
undergraduate studies. Lesser schools don't reject people in undergrad because 
they figure the person will choose a better school. You see this in MBA 
admissions, where someone will get rejected from a 30-50 school but accepted to 
several top 10-20.

I don't think you can have a true safety MBA school. 
------------
From: VP_MBA_SW
To: Alex805 


A safety school is one in which you have a high probability of being accepted. 
Generally, that means your GMAT is greater than the 80% range and your GPA is 
higher than the mean. Of course, the rest of your application (work exp., LORs, 
essays, interviews) should also be very strong. Also, you should make sure the 
school you select as your safety is one that you would actually attend if 
accepted (and your top choices rejected you). 
------------
From: tmino
To: Alex805 


Agree in a way with Omne, while you might be a very competitive applicant it is 
important to still treat these safety schools as your #1 choice. Even if you 
are more competitive than the average applicant to the school, you might be 
rejected if the adcoms feel their school is just your safety school. So show 
them some love :-) through researching the school well. Also, as mentioned, you 
should be happy about attending your safety school if you get dinged by your 
top choices in the end. 

MBAvolunteers - Application feedback in exchange for a donation to a 
non-profit. 
------------
From: babman
To: tmino 


The idea of safety is warranted when there is an objective base of evaluation 
and when a hierarchy exists as a result of that evaluation. The US News 
rankings are based on the prestige of the school from the perspective of the 
overall market, but in no way, honestly, speak to one school's ease of 
acceptance over another (when comparing the top 25 schools on the rankings). I 
use myself as an example, a Booth admit with $$, and a reject without interview 
from UCLA. Now, UCLA is in no way comparable to Chicago, and most would 
consider UCLA a safety to a Booth admit. However, this is not reality.

MBA admissions is not an objective evaluation of one's academic and career 
accomplishments prior to matriculation. Rather, it is a subjective persuasive 
effort to convince 4-5 strangers of your "fit" with the school. With the 
latter, the idea of safety school does not exist.

Good luck!
Sam
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Getting into B-School: Best Schools for Placement in the South? 

From: PurpleCraze
To: ALL 


Hi, first time poster here. I'm interested in eventually settling in DC or the 
Southeast (e.g. Atlanta, Raleigh-Durham) and am trying to narrow down the list 
of schools beyond H/S/W Fuqau and KFBS at N. Carolina are on my list, but I'm 
debating on MIT Sloan and Haas. Both have great science/tech and 
entrepreneurial focus, which are my areas of interest, but how hard is it to 
place outside of the Northeast or West Coast from those schools? Obviously, one 
has to do more legwork in the career search, but is there enough of a network 
in the South?

I have considered Goizueta and Smith, but Goizueta really doesn't seem to have 
very much focus on entrepreneurship, and I think I can do a lot better than 
Smith. Darden is just too remote for me taste. Thanks 
------------
From: Hyman_Roth
To: PurpleCraze 


I would like to stay between Charlotte, RDU, and Atlanta my self...so I have 
given this quite a bit of thought...

Consider Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, Southern Methodist (??), and i would give 
Darden another look. Darden may be remote, but it is heavily recruited by 
southern companies. As someone who has lived in the South my entire life I can 
tell you Darden and Fuqua are the "gold standard" in the South. And UNC and 
Emory are not far behind Wake Forest may be regional, but it has strong 
placement and a great network in the RDU, Charlotte, Atlanta triangle.

Vanderbilt is on the cusp of regional school and national presence. Strong name 
and strong finance program...

Don't know anything about Southern Methodist but it was ranked fairly high in 
the new BW ranking so it must have something going for it...

Just my humble opinion. 
------------
From: PurpleCraze
To: Hyman_Roth 


Thanks for the reply, HR. I guess one of my issues is that I want to have some 
brand "portability" should I end up leaving the region--so I'm trying to steer 
clear of regional schools. I realize brand isn't everything, but in my 
experience it is not insignificant, even several years into work.

I'm above 700 and 3.3 undergrad with a Ph.D., so I'm really looking to get in 
to as "top shelf" a school I can get into while still having some sort of 
inroad down South. I guess Duke and UNC fit the bill best, but that's why I was 
curious about tier 2's like MIT and Berkeley. Probably worth a post on those 
threads. 
------------
From: Hyman_Roth
To: PurpleCraze 


Thanks...and not to sound like a hypocrite but I did not apply to Darden, SMU 
or Vanderbilt... To me Darden is not for everybody...although I have heard its 
an exceptional school..and I had never heard of SMU until the recent BW 
rankings...Vandy was on my "if I don't get into Duke, I'll apply late round" 
list Its funny because I just don't believe "branding" is as important in the 
Southeast...some may disagree but i believe you can actually brand yourself out 
of some opportunities...... Still have to hear back from UNC and Emory who I am 
equally excited about PS...a PhD? Wow...you definitely have a prime opportunity 
for an exceptional "story" in your essays. 


 B-SCHOOL BLOGS
View over 4,500 blogs in our MBA Blogs community today! Share your journey, 
meet new friends, and expand your network. Connect with MBA students, 
applicants and alumni from Columbia, Kellogg, Notre Dame, and more! Become a 
blogger today! Here's an excerpt: 

MBA Bailout?
By Rudy

Comments: 0 Stars: 0


A long time ago my dad made a wise comment to me about business. He said; 'Son 
if you owe the bank $100,000 you're in trouble. If you owe them $100 million, 
they're in trouble. The message I got was clear; If you're going to gamble 
sometimes it makes sense to think BIG!!

The Economy sucks - I just got laid off my job as an analyst at Bank of 
America. They took a large relatively unquantifiable gamble on acquiring 
Merrill Lynch (They only had a week to do due dilligence on this $50bn deal) & 
a lot of employees had to go to justify cost-reducing 'synergies'. I was one of 
them. But look they just got a $25 bn bailout, so dad was right after all! 
Bernanke is betting that quantitative easing will work - right now the banks 
would rather spend all their $700 bn government bailout on 2% yielding treasury 
bonds than take the risk of lending it to anyone in this uncertain economy.

Bernanke is hoping that if the Fed buys up all the treasury bonds, this will 
reduce the yield & so make this strategy less effective; then the banks will 
have to lend to business again & that will get the economy going again, right? 
well fingers crossed on that one buddy? Maybe they'll prefer 100% of 1% to 0% 
of 10.

My friend John Hynes of the Gale Corp was just quoted in the New York Times 
business section about how he is $100 million short of the $400 m needed to 
revamp Filene's basement in Boston. This is what's going on in businesses all 
over the US & the globe right now.

Back to me - well I took my own gamble a few years ago (nothing in comparison 
those just mentioned though)... 
FOR THE FULL VERSION 

**************************************************************
This newsletter is a FREE service provided by BusinessWeek.   

To sign up for other newsletters, cancel delivery, change delivery 
options or change your e-mail address, please go to our Newsletter 
Preferences page.
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/bwn/form.asp?c=cf16b2f231665666

If you need other assistance, please contact Customer Service
http://www.businessweek.com/service.htm
or contact:

Wanda Cooper
BusinessWeek Customer Rights
Communications Data Services
1995 G Avenue
Red Oak, IA 51566
Phone: 1-800-635-1200

View our corporate privacy policy at 
http://newsletters.businessweek.com/bwn/mg-privacy.html

To learn more about how BusinessWeek applies this policy, you can contact our 
Marketing Department
mailto:[email protected] 

Terms of Use 
http://www.businessweek.com/copyrt.htm 
Privacy Notice 
http://www.businessweek.com/privacy.htm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"News" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfcv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to