<http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/election-2008-voter-fraud-102108>http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/election-2008-voter-fraud-102108





The Richardson Report: How To Rig an Election, the 2008 Edition

As the Republicans target ACORN and try to boot registered voters off 
the rolls across the U.S., new information surfaces about the 2004 
election. Also: Signs greed is dying.

By: John H. Richardson


Ed. Note: This is the second installment of John H. Richardson's 
weekly column, "The Richardson Report." It will run on Tuesdays. 
<http://www.esquire.com/archive/the-side/richardson-report/0/10/>You 
can view the archive here.

The Republicans Couldn't Steal the Election Again, Right? Right?

It could get ugly at the polls this November. Although experts agree 
that voter fraud is not a problem these days -- for what it's worth, 
the Justice Department convicts an average of eight people a year -- 
Republicans have been using the specter of voter fraud to ramp up 
their century-long campaign to suppress the votes of minorities, the 
young and the poor. 
<http://www.freep.com/article/20081020/NEWS15/81020064/1008/NEWS06>In 
Michigan, they tried to block the votes of people who had lost their 
homes to foreclosure. In Montana, they challenged some six thousand 
voters for filing change-of-address forms. 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html>According 
to The New York Times, nine states have broken the law by using 
Social Security data to purge registration lists. 
<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/30/eveningnews/main4490682.shtml>CBS 
found voter purges under way in 19 states. In Ohio, Republicans are 
fighting a bitter legal battle to challenge 660,000 new voters. 
There's a new voter ID law in Indiana. Pima County, Arizona now 
requires birth certificates at the polls. And so on.

It all came to a head last week with the uproar caused by the 
Republican campaign against ACORN, a liberal get-out-the-vote group 
that recently signed up 1.3 million new voters. While it's true that 
every year a handful of ACORN canvassers turn in forms with names 
like Donald Duck, Donald Duck never actually shows up to vote. 
Nevertheless, election officials are investigating ACORN in eleven 
battleground states like Ohio, Florida and North Carolina, and 
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/3219310/FBI-investigates-voter-registration-fraud-allegations.html>last
 
week the Justice Department announced its own investigation. On his 
website, John McCain's accused Barack Obama of both hiding "the true 
nature of his relationship to ACORN" and bragging that he'd "been 
fighting alongside ACORN" all his life. In a nutty moment of 
hysterical overstatement, he said that ACORN was "on the verge of 
maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in 
this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy." Reports of 
vandalism against ACORN offices and even death threats soon followed.

But this year, the Democrats are in no mood to back down. In Montana, 
the public outcry over the six thousand votes was so ferocious the 
<http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/gop_executive_director_steps_down/6077/>GOP
 
backed off and its executive director resigned. Democrats in Michigan 
went to court and last week a federal judge ruled the foreclosure 
challenge illegal. In Ohio, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner 
fought the Republicans all the way to the Supreme Court and won. 
Obama's campaign quickly sent a letter to the Justice Department 
asking a prosecutor to look into the "specious vote fraud 
allegations." And Congressman John Conyers upped the ante with a 
letter to both Justice and the FBI linking the anti-ACORN campaign to 
the scandal over the U.S. attorney firings in 2006, two of whom were 
fired for refusing to pursue equally bogus legal cases against ACORN 
canvassers.

And if it comes to a fight over who won, Obama has assembled 
<http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a.hk4HvCkpiE&refer=home>has
 
assembled a coalition of five thousand lawyers in Florida alone.

Three Ways To Make Sure Your Vote Counts

Speaking of which, a recent Zogby poll found that 32 percent of 
Americans were "not at all" confident that Bush won the 2004 election 
"fair and square." Those Americans include Conyers and Brunner and 
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 
<http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen>who
 
wrote this article arguing that Republicans won the election by 
stealing or suppressing 350,000 votes in Ohio.

More recently, the left-wing corners of the Internet have been 
buzzing with two recent depositions in a long-running lawsuit against 
J. Kenneth Blackwell, the former Ohio Secretary State. The first is 
from a researcher named Richard Hayes Phillips who says he examined 
126,000 ballots and 127 poll books and found 
<http://ohioelection2004.com/PDFHost/KingLincoln_Blackwell_060901PhillipsDeclaration.pdf>"much
 
evidence of ballot alternation, ballot substitution, ballot box 
stuffing, ballot destruction, vote switching, tabulator rigging and 
old-fashioned vote voter suppression." The other is 
<http://www.velvetrevolution.us/images/Spoon%20Aff%20to%20Reply%20filed%2091708.pdf>an
 
affidavit from Stephen Spoonamore, a Republican expert in data 
security who detailed his theory on how the votes were switched. More 
dramatically, he reported a conversation with Michael Connell, the 
Republican computer whiz who helped set up voting systems in Florida 
in 2000 and Ohio in 2004 and is now the computer expert for John 
McCain. "Mr. Connell is a devout Catholic. He has admitted to me that 
in his zeal to 'save the unborn' he may have helped others who have 
compromised elections. He was clearly uncomfortable when I asked 
directly about Ohio 2004."

Although none of this has been proven, it was intriguing enough to 
make me call the attorney fighting the case, Cliff Arnebeck. "We 
tried to get Connell to come forward and initially thought he was 
going to cooperate," he said. "Then we were told -- by an anonymous 
person who is apparently a senior person in the McCain campaign -- 
that he was threatened by Karl Rove, and the nature of the threat 
was, "If you implicate me, we're going to prosecute your wife."

Again, these may all turn out to be wild allegations, but if you're 
interested in Arnebeck's grand unified theory tying Rove to the 
tobacco companies and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. 
attorney firings in a plot to steal both the 2000 and 2004 elections, 
<http://www.velvetrevolution.us/prosecute%5Frove/>you can find much 
of it here. And if you're just interested in making sure it doesn't 
happen this time, you can take the advice of another person who 
believes the 2004 election was stolen, NYU professor Mark Crispin 
Miller:

"The spectacle of massive voter turnout is crucial, so they can't say 
people didn't bother to show up. Second, people have to double check 
and triple check to make sure they're sure they're registered -- call 
your secretary of state, or check out a book called Count My Vote, A 
Citizen's Guide to Voting. Third, go to 
<http://videothevote.org/>videothevote.org, a grassroots venture that 
will provide people with cameras so they can interview people who are 
turned away at the polls. It's crucial to think ahead of the 
possibility of a stolen race and collect evidence. And if people have 
bizarre problems with the machinery, they shouldn't just go home. 
They should stay there so the media will see them, and their numbers 
should grow."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to