A prefatory note from John Brakey:

Many of us know that Jim Crow lives in Maricopa County, Arizona and 
that affects the rest of the state:

**17 out of every 100 voters that voted at a precinct in Maricopa 
County had to vote a provisional ballot. In Maricopa County, Phoenix, 
AZ

**This made for a total of 112,000 provisional in the Nov 4th election

**In 2004 it was about 60,000

**In 2000 it was 40,000

Arizona was one of the first states to use the provisional ballot as 
a tool to disenfranchise voters. They've been using them since the 
mid-Eighties.

Arizona is one of about 13 states whose elections the DoJ's Civil 
Rights Division has had to
oversee because of this state's Jim Crow activities. For the last 
eight years, though, the DoJ
has been of little help.

Many of us have been hoping for a real Justice Department, with a 
real Civil Rights Division;
and now Obama's pick of Eric Holder as AG is great news. I'm going to 
keep fighting with everything I got for the next 200 days, and hope 
that the new DoJ will jump in and help all of us.
--John Brakey

Did John McCain Lose Arizona?

Denis Campbell
Posted November 18, 2008 | 03:53 PM (EST)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/denis-campbell/did-john-mccain-lose-ariz_b_144687.html

While Maricopa County (Phoenix) Judge Edward O. Burke agreed with the 
state's Libertarian Party that county elections director, Helen 
Purcell, did not follow election law, ensure ballot integrity and 
provide an unbroken custody chain, he ruled against them saying, "in 
a county the size the size of Maricopa (sic), perfect compliance with 
the statutory electoral scheme, while desirable, is not possible due 
to time, space, the practicalities of the electoral process and the 
number of persons involved" in denying their injunction for a hand 
recount last Friday.
Pardon me, but, WTF?

We still do not have a final Presidential result in the state of 
Missouri, 14 days after the election. We still do not have all 
ballots counted in Alaska in their razor close Senate race. We still 
do not have a result in the Minnesota Senate race and will have a 
mandatory recount. We still do not have a result in Georgia where a 
run-off election will be held on December 2nd, but John McCain's 
state and home county (the largest in AZ) need not follow election 
laws because it may be inconvenient for them to so do?!

What kind of a banana republic state does the former Republican 
Presidential candidate represent? I reported extensively in the 
run-up to this election about problems in Tucson's Pima County (2nd 
largest county see citations at article's end) where now even the 
County Manager is distancing himself from the justifiably embattled 
Elections Director there (http://blog.tucsonweekly.com/?p=1691).

At first glance, John McCain appears to have comfortably won his home 
state by about 9 percentage points. Barack Obama won Tucson (Pima) 
and John McCain won Phoenix (Maricopa). Those two counties though 
account for almost 70% of the total vote. So, if one wanted to hack a 
series of memory cards or alter the vote's results, these two 
counties would have the greatest impact and make the most sense.

I'm puzzled. Aside from losing a wild-card pool pick state (I had AZ 
going to Obama against the odds), how can so many states surrounding 
Arizona... New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada and California turn blue, yet 
this one stay so conspicuously red? Why did team Obama, who had a 
solid run, spend money and time in AZ? Did McCain actually lose 
Maricopa County, because if he did, he would have lost his home 
state. When the stakes are so high, it makes one think.

John Brakey is as passionate as they come. This citizen warrior is 
part of AUDIT AZ and they work tirelessly for election transparency 
and integrity. Since 1996 they have been battling election 
authorities in Pima County. Their work has uncovered major systemic 
problems with Diebold and ES&S machines, Indeed as covered earlier, 
the state's Attorney General still refuses to seize questionable 
ballots from a 2004 election and order a recount that could resolve 
this issue once and for all.

Said Brakey about Maricopa County, "the point of all this is to force 
this out-of-control election department to resolve chain-of custody 
issues, to force the county to follow the rules of law."
At trial, evidence was introduced but not addressed in the court's 
decision. This included testimony given orally and by affidavit about:

-unsigned poll register tapes,
-the lack of security handling and transporting memory packs and
-the flimsy and easily manipulated ballot containers and seals.

Jim March, an elections security expert with BlackBoxVoting.org 
testified in an affidavit introduced at trial, "the elections 
department used flimsy plastic containers purchased at Fry's 
Electronics store that can be easily opened by removing the hinges. 
This keeps the election department seals intact."

Without a proper chain of custody, properly sealed bags, and memory 
card on walkabout throughout the county, if someone wanted to ensure 
a victory there are many ways in which to do that.

This film shows election results arriving without proper seals and 
custody and elections director Purcell unconcerned then belligerent. 
All it takes is one infected card to alter the entire tabulation 
computer's result.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNkf2jHkel8

As was shown time and again this election, our nation's voting 
systems are badly broken. That people have to give up a day or half 
day's wages to vote is, as MSNBC's Rachel Maddow suggested, a new 
form of the Jim Crow era poll tax.

That they stood on line for so long and did so in record numbers is a 
reason for us all to feel proud.

That belligerent "public servants" can treat an independent election 
observer and the process with such disdain should be a dismissible 
offence. There is no room for that kind of behaviour.

Earlier this election season we highlighted a public-private 
cooperative effort in Humboldt County, CA that should be the model 
for election departments across the USA. Uniform national election 
laws and procedures for recounts should be a priority before the 
mid-term elections.

Defensiveness, confrontation and belligerence have no place in such a 
sacred place as the local election department. It is the one right we 
must all fight for responsibly and the sooner both sides come out of 
confrontation and into cooperation the better it will be for us all.

http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/21/voting-transparency-through-the-looking-glass-of-technological-ballot-boxes/

Did John McCain lose his own county and state? We will never know.

And we should.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to