Insubordination In the Pentagon?

By <http://www.talkleft.com/user/Big%20Tent%20Democrat>Big 
Tent Democrat, 
Section <http://www.talkleft.com/section/obamaadmin>Obama 
Administration

The <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/30gitmo.html?_r=1>NYTimes 
story on <http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/1/29/131245/815>the 
refusal of a military commissions judge to abide 
by President Obama's executive order halting all 
military commissions proceedings raises the level 
of importance of this situation. Indeed, the 
article raises some very worrisome possibilities:

[S]ome critics of the military commission system 
said the decision appeared to express the views 
of military officers who would like to complicate 
the Obama administration's efforts to close 
Guantánamo and, possibly, abandon the military 
commission system.

Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the 
American Civil Liberties Union, who has praised 
President Obama's early actions on Guantánamo, 
said the ruling in the Nashiri case had raised 
questions about whether the Pentagon would resist 
the administration's efforts.


. . . The effect of Colonel Pohl's decision could 
be reversed by the chief Pentagon official for 
the military commission system, Susan J. 
Crawford. Lawyers said Thursday that she could 
dismiss the charges against Mr. Nashiri "without 
prejudice," which would effectively remove the 
case from the judge, while clearing the way for 
prosecutors to file new charges in the future.

A military official said he expected such a 
decision from Ms. Crawford, who has broad powers 
over commission cases. But some military 
officials said it was difficult to predict what 
she would do. . . .

Pentagon officials appeared confused by 
Thursday's development because many thought the 
system was essentially paused after Mr. Obama 
issued an executive order on Jan. 22 that 
directed immediate steps to assure that military 
commission cases "are halted." A Pentagon 
spokesman, Cmdr. Jeffrey D. Gordon, issued a 
statement that officials were reviewing Colonel 
Pohl's decision. But the statement added, "We 
will be in compliance with the president's orders 
regarding Guantánamo."

         [Emphasis added]

Well, right now, the Pentagon is NOT in 
compliance with the President's executive order 
and
that is extremely troubling. Adding to the the problem:

Some of those who have criticized the president's 
decision to turn sharply away from the Bush 
administration's detention policies called 
Colonel Pohl's decision encouraging. Kirk S. 
Lippold, the retired commander of the Cole, 
issued a statement saying that Mr. Obama's order 
to close Guantánamo within a year had not 
considered the impact on the victims of 
terrorism. "Today's decision," the statement 
continued, "is a victory for the 17 families of 
the sailors who lost their lives on the U.S.S. 
Cole over eight years ago."

It is in this context that I believe that 
President Obama is impelled to act in a way that 
publicly rebukes Judge Pohl's insubordination. 
For it was Judge 
Pohl <http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/guantanamo/story/814105.html>who 
said on January 15:

"This court is aware that on Jan. 20 there will 
be a new commander-in-chief, which may or may not 
impact on these proceedings," he said, warning 
everyone to stay focused ``unless and until a 
competent authority tells us not to." [Emphasis 
added]

The President of the United States told the 
military "not to" in a January 22 executive order.
Judge Pohl is defying his commander in chief. 
This is serious business now. Judge Pohl must
be publicly rebuked for not recognizing President 
Obama as his commander in chief and the
authority over the military commissions, as 
provided for by the Military Commissions Act. His 
actions are outrageous and can not be allowed to 
stand. The implications could be enormous.

Speaking for me only
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to