February 7, 2009
Following Up with Steve Heller, formerly known as the "Diebold Whistle-blower"
By Joan Brunwasser

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Following-Up-with-Steve-He-by-Joan-Brunwasser-090207-338.html

I recently had the opportunity to catch up with election integrity 
hero, Steve Heller.  Our last interview was back in August, 2007.

You achieved notoriety a few years back.  You stole the Diebold 
documents in January of 2004, the search warrant was served on your 
house in August of 2004, you were indicted on three felony charges in 
February of 2006, and you pled guilty to one felony count of 
unauthorized access to a computer in November of that same year. 
[For more background and details, all of the press and many of the 
blog posts on Steve Heller's case can be found here.]  So what's 
happened since then?

Well, in terms of my case, what's happened is that when I pled 
guilty, I had to pay $10,000 in restitution to the law firm from 
which I stole the Diebold documents, and I was put on felony 
probation for three years.  After one year, we petitioned the court 
for a reduction of my sentence from a felony to a misdemeanor.  That 
petition was granted, and as of now, I remain on misdemeanor 
probation.

In terms of my activist life, that has continued in a much more 
involved way than before my criminal case.  Being the "Diebold 
Whistle-blower" gave me a lot of "street cred," you might say, with 
the election integrity (EI) community, and so there were a lot of 
media appearances and public speaking engagements.  I just went out 
there and did my best to spread the word about the fact that our 
elections are unverifiable and totally without security, and what we 
must do to reverse this problem.

Financially, it's been difficult.  The legal bills were huge, and 
while my legal defense fund helped a lot, we took a big hit 
financially.  And my crime made it impossible for me to continue 
making the very good living I was making as a legal word processor; 
no one will ever hire me for that work again.  But I'm in school full 
time retraining for a new career and hopefully in the near future 
I'll be able to make a good living again.  But at this point, with so 
many Americans in serious financial straits, my wife and I consider 
ourselves very lucky.  We've got our house, food on the table, and we 
are able to cover our bills.  So believe me, we're not complaining.

As for my personal life, nothing has changed, thank goodness.  My 
wife Michele and I have come through my legal problems with our 
marriage stronger than ever.  I did something that brought a lot of 
trouble to our doorstep, but Michele stood by me like a rock; she 
knows that I did what I had to do.  I owe her so much.

How is your life different now?

Before my crime, I was only an armchair EI activist.  I had read Bev 
Harris' book, Black Box Voting, and I followed the EI news very 
closely.  I'd brood about our elections and how shoddy, unreliable, 
and unverifiable they were (and still are).  I strongly believed (and 
still believe) that Bush was not elected but was selected by a 
right-wing cadre of Supreme Court judges who invented law out of 
whole cloth in order to appoint their preferred candidate.  I'd 
fulminate about how "We, the People" should have risen up and refused 
to accept having our president selected for us against the wishes of 
a majority of voters in Florida and all across the nation.  I worried 
almost constantly about our democratic republic and the continuation 
of our liberties.  But I'm embarrassed to say that until January of 
2004, I didn't actually *do* much of anything about it.

But stealing and exposing those documents was doing something about 
it, and that's an understatement.  I was plunged into the midst of a 
very hot fight, and suddenly I became one of the front line soldiers 
in the on-going struggle to restore accuracy and integrity to our 
elections.  And I'm proud to still be directly involved in that fight.

And to me, being part of the battle for election integrity is a 
perfect example of "fighting the good fight."  Clean elections are 
one of the "goodest" of the good fights.  And I would now like to 
apologize to my deceased mother, who was an English teacher, for 
using the word "goodest."  Sorry, Mom.

What are you doing, these days?

I'm very proud to be working with Velvet Revolution (VR), which is an 
organization co-founded by Brett Kimberlin and Brad Friedman, 
publisher of The BRAD BLOG.  My job with VR is to assist Brett and 
Brad as a blogger and researcher for any and all EI issues.  One of 
VR's offshoot websites is the Election Protection Strike Force, and I 
blog a fair amount on there.  I also work with Emily Levy, another 
member of VR, on any number of EI projects that come up.  At present, 
I'm assisting Emily in VR's call for an investigation of some strange 
discrepancies in California's 2008 election regarding Prop 8, the 
amendment to restrict marriage rights.

What's your main goal as an EI activist?

In the broadest sense, it's to make our elections accurate, reliable, 
verifiable, and secure.  But the devil is in the details, as they 
say.  There's a tremendous amount of work that needs to be done to 
get to that goal, and in this interview I won't get into the 
nitty-gritty details.  But if we could accomplish the following 
things, we'd be taking a giant step forward:

1.  A voter-marked paper ballot for every vote in every election, no 
exceptions;

2.  The paper ballots counted in a public, transparent, and 
verifiable manner at the local precinct level with citizen 
observation allowed by law;

3.  Precinct results posted publicly before those results are 
forwarded to any other location(s);

4.  Strict and clearly defined chain-of-custody procedures for all 
ballots and election equipment before, during, and after every 
election;

5.  And finally, we need to actually enforce the laws!  All too often 
election officials, candidates, and political parties fail to comply 
with various election laws that are on the books, and nothing 
happens.  There's no accountability.  This must stop.  There must be 
real accountability and serious consequences for anyone who fails to 
abide by election laws.

When you looked ahead, is this what you imagined yourself doing?

Oh, hell no.  I certainly never expected to be a middle-aged, 
unemployed, felonious political activist!  But while my life has 
definitely taken some pretty wild turns -- and whose hasn't? -- I'm 
very happy with where I'm at and proud of what I did.

Was the price you paid worth it?

Yes.  It was pretty scary for a while, and the financial fears were 
intense.  We came very close to losing our house.  But we managed to 
muddle through, and while we have no savings and we're still 
struggling financially, my wife and I are doing fine, we're hanging 
in there, and we have every reason to believe that things will get 
better for us.  We're really exceptionally lucky in many ways.

But mostly, it was worth it because it gave me an opportunity to 
serve and protect my country as a citizen activist, a chance to 
defend my democratic republic.  I was able to expose just a few of 
the crimes Diebold was perpetrating against our nation's elections. 
Doing that was well worth the price my wife and I had to pay for what 
I did.

Would you do it again?

You bet, in a heartbeat.  I never would have forgiven myself if I, 
who up until that point had never really done anything for my nation 
other than pay my taxes and be a decent citizen, had turned away from 
the opportunity to expose serious crimes being committed against our 
elections and thus against our entire republic.  Yes, I'd do it again 
without a second thought.

But let me make this clear: I did commit a serious crime.  I stole 
and exposed attorney-client privileged documents, and that is a very 
serious violation of the law.  Even corrupt, criminal corporations 
like Diebold deserve under the law to have all communications with 
their attorneys and their attorney's work product kept secret, and I 
broke that law.  So I don't make light of the serious nature of my 
crime.

But what is illegal is not always wrong.

I pled guilty to my crime, and I accept responsibility for what I 
did.  I have been and am still being punished for it.  But I believe 
that in this single, isolated, discreet instance, what I did was 
illegal, but not wrong.  I sleep well at night.

Any words of advice to activists trying to break through the wall of 
the new administration?

I think there will be a lower wall, now.  The Bush 
(mis)administration was one of the most secretive in history, and 
their contempt for Congress and for the rights and liberties of the 
American people was horrific.  I don't think it will be like that 
with President Obama.  But of course getting the ear of those in 
power is always difficult, and the best advice I can give is to be 
persistent, and to organize with like-minded individuals.  Either 
join an existing group or organization that's fighting for the cause 
or causes that are dear to your heart, or start your own group.  The 
internet and social networking sites make organizing easier than 
ever.  Turn off the TV, get up from the couch, and get out there, get 
active.

I'm haunted by something I recently read in the New York Times: that 
45 states have a budget deficit.  How the heck are we going to get 
anyone to throw out their old electronic voting systems if they have 
no money?

The fact is that switching to a paper ballot system would actually be 
a significant savings over the current cost of maintaining those 
horrible, inaccurate, unverifiable, and easily hacked electronic 
voting machines.  Dumping those damn machines and the maintenance 
contracts/costs that accompany them would actually save money for the 
states.  Paper ballot systems are much less expensive, they work 
better, and maintenance costs are very, very low.

Along those same lines, I'd urge the states to seriously consider 
suing the various voting machine companies for fraud.  These 
companies made guarantees in writing about the accuracy, reliability, 
and security of their voting machines and ballot counting devices, 
and most of these guarantees have been proven false.  I'm not a 
lawyer, but I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that many states would 
have a very strong civil case against these companies, and suing to 
recoup all or part of their costs for the fraudulent and shoddy 
equipment would be another way for a state to legitimately boost 
revenue.

Well, Steve, you've been very candid about your anything-but-dull 
life since 2004.  You stood up for American voters in a gutsy move 
that cost you, big time.  Thank you.  And, good luck to you!





Author's Bio: Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for 
Election Reform (CER) which exists for the sole purpose of raising 
the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. We aim 
to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes 
are cast in private and counted in public. Electronic (computerized) 
voting systems are simply antithetical to democratic principles.

CER set up a lending library to achieve the widespread distribution 
of the DVD Invisible Ballots: A temptation for electronic vote fraud. 
Within eighteen months, the project had distributed over 3200 copies 
across the country and beyond. CER now concentrates on group 
showings, OpEd pieces, articles, reviews, interviews, discussion 
sessions, networking, conferences, anything that promotes awareness 
of this critical problem. Joan has been Election Integrity Editor for 
OpEdNews since December, 2005.
Back
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to