Another Right-Wing Conspiracy in Washington?
By Bill Press
Sunday, February 8, 2009; Page B08  Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/06/AR2009020602511.html

If you're looking for a break from those conservative voices that 
dominate talk radio, take time
out today to listen to local station OBAMA 1260 AM. You'll hear the 
progressive voices of Stephanie Miller, Ed Schultz, Lionel -- or, 
during morning drive, my own "Bill Press Show"
--providing welcome relief from the constant Obama-bashing by Rush 
Limbaugh and others. Unfortunately, today's the last day you'll be 
able to do so.

As reported by The Post [Style, Feb. 2], Dan Snyder's Red Zebra 
Broadcasting Co., owner
of OBAMA 1260, has announced plans to jettison all progressive talk 
and replace it with pre-recorded financial advice programming.

The commercial use of public airwaves is supposed to reflect the 
diversity of the local
community, but that's not how it works in Washington. On the AM dial, 
WMAL (630)
features wall-to-wall conservative talk. So do stations WTNT (570) 
and WHFS (1580).
For the past two years, OBAMA 1260 -- even with a weak signal that 
cannot be heard
in downtown Washington -- was the exception.

No longer. Starting tomorrow, our nation's capital, where Democrats 
control the House,
the Senate and the White House, and where Democrats outnumber 
Republicans 10 to one,
will have no progressive voices on the air.

Or maybe one.

To mollify critics, Red Zebra has said it will add Ed Schultz to its 
conservative lineup on
570 AM. This means Shultz will be outgunned in this market by at 
least 15 conservative
talkers: Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, Chris 
Plante, Michael
Smerconish, Michael Savage, Andy Parks, Fred Grandy, Bill Bennett, 
Monica Crowley,
Bill O'Reilly, Dennis Miller and Lars Larsen. No matter how good 
Schultz is, that's not
a fair contest -- nor a fair use of the public airwaves.

Unfortunately, what's happening in Washington reflects what has 
happened in one city
after another across the country. In Miami, Clear Channel recently 
dumped progressive
talk for sports: Clear Channel stations made the same move in San 
Diego and Cincinnati.
Sacramento abandoned progressive talk for gospel music. In fact, 
according to a study
released by the Center for American Progress and Free Press, there 
are nine hours of
conservative talk for every one hour of progressive talk.

Why? Station owners complain they can't get good ratings or make any money with
progressive talk, but that's nonsense. In Minnesota, independent 
owner Janet Robert
has operated KTNF (950 AM) profitably for five years. In Madison, Wis., WXXM,
92.1 FM, just scored its highest ratings ever. And KPOJ in Portland, 
Ore., soared with
progressive talk from No. 23 in market ratings to No. 1. Nationwide, 
progressive talkers
Randi Rhodes, Ed Schultz and Stephanie Miller have proven that, given 
a level playing
ield, they can more than hold their own in ratings -- and make money 
for their stations.

In fact, the only reason there's not more competition on American 
airwaves is that the
handful of companies that own most radio stations do everything they 
can to block it.
In many markets -- witness Philadelphia, Boston, Providence and 
Houston -- they join
in providing no outlet for progressive talk. In others, as in 
Washington, they limit it to a
weak signal, spend zero dollars on promotion and soon pull the plug.

Companies are given a license to operate public airwaves -- free! -- 
in order to make a
profit, yes, but also, according to the terms of their FCC license, 
"to operate in the public
interest and to afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of 
conflicting views of
issues of public importance." Stations are not operating in the 
public interest when they
offer only conservative talk.

For years, the Fairness Doctrine prevented such abuse by requiring 
licensed stations to
carry a mix of opinion. However, under pressure from conservatives, 
President Ronald
Reagan's Federal Communications Commission canceled the Fairness 
Doctrine in 1987,
insisting that in a free market, stations would automatically offer a 
balance in programming.

That experiment has failed. There is no free market in talk radio 
today, only an exclusive,
tightly held, conservative media conspiracy. The few holders of 
broadcast licenses have
made it clear they will not, on their own, serve the general public. 
Maybe it's time to bring
back the Fairness Doctrine -- and bring competition back to talk 
radio in Washington
and elsewhere.

-- Bill Press
Washington
The writer, host of "The Bill Press Show," is working on a book about 
talk radio.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to