And a grand jury has subpoenaed Pete Domenici's 
records. This all has to do with
with Bush/Rove's purge of David Yglesias, who was New Mexico's US Attorney,
until he balked at acting on fake charges of Democratic "voter fraud."

[Here's the Washington Post's article on the investigation:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103673.html?referrer=emailarticle]

MCM


<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jYuH3mAZbV0pXTznoxmZ2anGhojwD969KBF00>Ex-lawmaker's
 
records subpoenaed in firings probe

By PETE YOST - 20 hours ago

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jYuH3mAZbV0pXTznoxmZ2anGhojwD969KBF00


WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal grand jury has 
subpoenaed records of former Sen. Pete Domenici, 
and prosecutors are preparing to interview an 
ex-aide to former White House political adviser 
Karl Rove in an investigation of politically 
tinged firings of U.S. attorneys.

The moves are the clearest sign yet that the 
criminal inquiry, which began in September, is 
likely to continue for many months.

Career federal prosecutor Nora R. Dannehy is 
looking into whether former Attorney General 
Alberto Gonzales, other Bush administration 
officials or Republicans in Congress should face 
criminal charges in the dismissals.

Some White House officials, including Rove as 
well as Domenici, R-N.M., the retired senator's 
former chief of staff and others refused to be 
interviewed in an earlier joint inquiry by the 
Justice Department's inspector general and the 
department's Office of Professional 
Responsibility.

Rove has said he will cooperate with Dannehy's investigation.

Tom Carson, a spokesman for Dannehy, declined to comment.

The earlier Justice Department inquiry concluded 
that despite Bush administration denials, 
political considerations played a part in the 
firings of as many as four federal prosecutors. 
Nine U.S. attorneys in all were fired in 2006.

The interview with Scott Jennings, former White 
House deputy director of political affairs, was 
expected to occur Thursday at Justice Department 
offices in Washington, according to Jennings' 
attorney, Mark Paoletta of Washington.

The grand jury subpoena for some of Domenici's 
records was confirmed by two private attorneys 
who spoke on condition of anonymity because they 
were not representing the former senator. 
Domenici's attorney, K. Lee Blalack, declined to 
comment about what he described as Ms. Dannehy's 
review.

Dropping a subpoena on Domenici may have at least 
as much to do with the conduct of Justice 
Department officials as about Domenici, who 
retired from the Senate this year.

Domenici made three phone calls to Gonzales in 
2005 and 2006 and one to Deputy Attorney General 
Paul McNulty in October 2006 complaining about 
the performance of U.S. Attorney David Iglesias, 
one of those fired for what the Justice 
Department's inspector general said were 
political reasons.

In a February 2007 briefing for the Senate 
Judiciary Committee, McNulty did not mention 
Domenici's phone calls, nor were they listed on a 
chart prepared for the briefing at the Justice 
Department.

Two weeks later, Iglesias became the first person 
to publicly refer to Domenici possibly having had 
a role in removing Iglesias from his job, saying 
at a news conference that two members of Congress 
pressured him to bring an indictment in a public 
corruption case before Election Day in November 
2006. In response to Iglesias' statements, 
Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M., 
confirmed they had telephoned Iglesias but denied 
that they pressured him in any way.

Jennings also had a role in the Iglesias 
controversy. He was on the receiving end of 
complaints from Republicans in New Mexico that 
Iglesias had failed to prosecute voter fraud in a 
state that President George W. Bush narrowly lost 
in the 2000 presidential election.

In the earlier Justice Department inquiry, 
Jennings told investigators that shortly after 
joining the White House in early 2005, he heard 
criticism of Iglesias' performance from 
Domenici's chief of staff.

Jennings said the chief of staff, Steve Bell, 
periodically told him that he was unhappy with 
Iglesias' response to voter fraud complaints and 
other issues and that the White House should 
replace him. Jennings said he passed along that 
information to his immediate superiors, who, like 
Jennings, worked for Rove.

Jennings' attorney, Paoletta, said Wednesday that 
"in her efforts to gather all of the facts, the 
special prosecutor asked to interview Scott. 
Scott is happy to cooperate to the best of his 
ability, as he has done with all probes to date. 
It is my understanding that Scott is not a target 
in this investigation."

Jennings also was involved in discussions that 
led to one of Rove's aides, Tim Griffin, becoming 
U.S. attorney in Little Rock, Ark. He replaced 
H.E. "Bud" Cummins. The two U.S. senators from 
Arkansas had expressed reservations about Griffin.

Cummins was one of the U.S. attorneys targeted 
for removal on a list that Gonzales' chief of 
staff, Kyle Sampson, supplied to the White House 
in March 2005. Cummins' name remained on every 
removal list throughout the drawn-out 
decisionmaking process that concluded in December 
2006, the month that eight of the nine firings 
took place.
On the Net:

     * Justice Department inspector general's 
report on firing of U.S. attorneys: 
<http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0809a/final.pdf>http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0809a/final.pdf

Hosted by Google
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to