Prof. Joel Kovel, the author of a broad range of 
extraordinary writings, has been fired by
Bard College for his works on Israel and Zionism.

The following press release comes from a group 
called the Committee for an Open Discussion
of Zionism. Below that is Kovel's own statement on his ouster.

MCM


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Joel Kovel Fired by Bard College

February 20, 2009

Professor Joel Kovel has taught at Bard College 
for 21 years. He was awarded a Presidential 
appointment to the Alger Hiss Chair of Social 
Studies in 1988. In February 2009, Professor 
Kovel was notified that his contract would not be 
renewed.

Why?

In recent years Dr. Kovel has become a leading 
critic of Israel. His book "Overcoming Zionism: 
and numerous articles call for a One State 
solution to the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. His 
termination is prejudicial and motivated neither 
by intellectual nor pedagogic  considerations. 
Rather, as Professor Kovel's attached statement 
and the chronology of events show, the refusal to 
renew his contract after two decades was a 
political decision stemming principally from 
differences between Kovel and the Bard 
administration on the issue of Zionism and 
Israel. The political nature of Kovel's 
termination was manifest in the discussion of the 
faculty evaluation committee.

Bard's move comes after the University of 
Michigan Press censored Kovel's book from its 
list in 2007, capitulating to an attack campaign 
by Zionist groups. Public outcry forced UMP to 
restore the book to its list, but they 
subsequently terminated their distribution 
contract with Pluto Press, Kovel's publisher.

The Committee for an Open Discussion of Zionism 
considers the Bard administration's actions an 
assault on academic freedom and free speech. In 
response, we have launched a national campaign 
demanding Professor Kovel's reinstatement. The 
college's actions with regard to the termination 
of Professor Joel Kovel are deplorable. We call 
on all who care about civil liberties and the 
right to free expression to let your voices be 
heard.

Contacts for Bard Administration:

Leon Botstein
[email protected]
President of the College;
Leon Levy Professor in the Arts and Humanities
Office of the President
Bard College
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504

Dimitri Papadimitrou
[email protected]
Executive Vice President
Bard College
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504


STATEMENT OF JOEL KOVEL REGARDING HIS TERMINATION BY BARD COLLEGE


INTRODUCTION

In January, 1988, I was appointed to the Alger 
Hiss Chair of Social Studies at Bard College. As 
this was a Presidential appointment outside the 
tenure system, I have served under a series of 
contracts. The last of these was half-time (one 
semester on, one off, with half salary and full 
benefits year-round), effective from July 1, 
2004, to June 30, 2009. On February 7 I received 
a letter from Michèle Dominy, Dean of the 
College, informing me that my contract would not 
be renewed this July 1 and that I would be moved 
to emeritus status as of that day. She wrote that 
this decision was made by President Botstein, 
Executive Vice-President Papadimitriou and 
herself, in consultation with members of the 
Faculty Senate.

This document argues that this termination of 
service is prejudicial and motivated neither by 
intellectual nor pedagogic considerations, but by 
political values, principally stemming from 
differences between myself and the Bard 
administration on the issue of Zionism. There is 
of course much more to my years at Bard than 
this, including another controversial subject, my 
work on ecosocialism (The Enemy of Nature). 
However, the evidence shows a pattern of conflict 
over Zionism only too reminiscent of innumerable 
instances in this country in which critics of 
Israel have been made to pay, often with their 
careers, for speaking out. In this instance the 
process culminated in a deeply flawed evaluation 
process which was used to justify my termination 
from the faculty.

A BRIEF CHRONOLOGY

* 2002. This was the first year I spoke out 
nationally about Zionism. In October, my article, 
"Zionism's Bad Conscience," appeared in Tikkun. 
Three or four weeks later, I was called into 
President Leon Botstein's office, to be told my 
Hiss Chair was being taken away. Botstein said 
that he had nothing to do with the decision, then 
gratuitously added that it had not been made 
because of what I had just published about 
Zionism, and hastened to tell me that his views 
were diametrically opposed to mine.

* 2003. In January I published a second article 
in Tikkun, "Left-Anti-Semitism' and the Special 
Status of Israel," which argued for a One-State 
solution to the dilemmas posed by Zionism. A few 
weeks later, I received a phone call at home from 
Dean Dominy, who suggested, on behalf of 
Executive Vice-President Dimitri Papadimitriou, 
that perhaps it was time for me to retire from 
Bard. I declined. The result of this was an 
evaluation of my work and the inception, in 2004, 
of the current half-time contract as 
"Distinguished Professor."

* 2006. I finished a draft of Overcoming Zionism. 
In January, while I was on a Fellowship in South 
Africa, President Botstein conducted a concert on 
campus of the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra, which 
he has directed since 2003. In a stunning 
departure from traditional concert practice, this 
began with the playing of the national anthems of 
the United States and Israel, after each of which 
the audience rose. Except for a handful of 
protestors, the event went unnoticed. I regarded 
it, however, as paradigmatic of the "special 
relationship" between the United States and 
Israel, one that has conduced to war in Iraq and 
massive human rights violations in 
Israel/Palestine. In December, I organized a 
public lecture at Bard (with Mazin Qumsiyeh) to 
call attention to this problem. Only one faculty 
person attended; the rest were students and 
community people; and the issue was never taken 
up on campus.

* 2007. "Overcoming Zionism" was now on the 
market, arguing for a One-State solution (and 
sharply criticizing, among others, Martin Peretz 
for a scurrilous op-ed piece against Rachel 
Corrie in the Los Angeles Times. Peretz is an 
official in AIPAC's foreign policy think-tank, 
and at the time a Bard Trustee-though this latter 
fact was not pointed out in the book). In August, 
Overcoming Zionism was attacked by a watchdog 
Zionist group, StandWithUs/Michigan, which 
succeeded in pressuring the book's United States 
distributor, the University of Michigan Press, to 
remove it from circulation. An extraordinary 
outpouring of support (650 letters to U of M) 
succeeded in reversing this frank episode of 
book-burning. I was disturbed, however, by the 
fact that, with the exception of two non-tenure 
track faculty, there was no support from Bard in 
response to this egregious violation of the 
speech rights of a professor. When I asked 
President Botstein in an email why this was so, 
he replied that he felt I was doing quite well at 
taking care of myself. This was irrelevant to the 
obligation of a college to protect its faculty 
from violation of their rights of free 
expression-all the more so, a college such as 
Bard with a carefully honed reputation as a 
bastion of academic freedom, and which indeed 
defines such freedom in its Faculty Handbook as a 
"right . . . to search for truth and 
understanding without interference and to 
disseminate his [sic] findings without 
intimidation."

* 2008. Despite some reservations by the faculty, 
I was able to teach a course on Zionism. In my 
view, and that of most of the students, it was 
carried off successfully. Concurrently with this, 
another evaluation of my work at Bard was 
underway. Unlike previous evaluations, in 1996 
and 2003, this was unenthusiastic. It was cited 
by Dean Dominy as instrumental in the decision to 
let me go.

IRREGULARITIES IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS

The evaluation committee included Professor Bruce 
Chilton, along with Professors Mark Lambert and 
Kyle Gann. Professor Chilton is a member of the 
Social Studies division, a distinguished 
theologian, and the campus' Protestant chaplain. 
He is also active in Zionist circles, as chair of 
the Episcopal°©Jewish Relations Committee in the 
Episcopal Diocese of New York, and a member of 
the Executive Committee of Christians for Fair 
Witness on the Middle East. In this capacity he 
campaigns vigorously against Protestant efforts 
to promote divestment and sanctions against the 
State of Israel. Professor Chilton is 
particularly antagonistic to the Palestinian 
liberation theology movement, Sabeel, and its 
leader, Rev. Naim Ateek, also an Episcopal. This 
places him on the other side of the divide from 
myself, who attended a Sabeel Conference in 
Birmingham, MI, in October, 2008, as an invited 
speaker, where I met Rev. Ateek, and expressed 
admiration for his position. It should also be 
observed that Professor Chilton was active this 
past January in supporting Israeli aggression in 
Gaza. He may be heard on a national radio program 
on WABC, "Religion on the Line," (January 11, 
2009) arguing from the Doctrine of Just War and 
claiming that it is anti-Semitic to criticize 
Israel for human rights violations-this despite 
the fact that large numbers of Jews have been in 
the forefront of protesting Israeli crimes in 
Gaza.

Of course, Professor Chilton has the right to his 
opinion as an academic and a citizen. 
Nonetheless, the presence of such a voice on the 
committee whose conclusion was instrumental in 
the decision to remove me from the Bard faculty 
is highly dubious. Most definitely, Professor 
Chilton should have recused himself from this 
position. His failure to do so, combined with the 
fact that the decision as a whole was made in 
context of adversity between myself and the Bard 
administration, renders the process of my 
termination invalid as an instance of what the 
College's Faculty Handbook calls a procedure 
"designed to evaluate each faculty member fairly 
and in good faith."

I still strove to make my future at Bard the 
subject of reasonable negotiation. However, my 
efforts in this direction were rudely denied by 
Dean Dominy's curt and dismissive letter (at the 
urging, according to her, of Vice-President 
Papadimitriou), which plainly asserted that there 
was nothing to talk over and that I was being 
handed a fait accompli. In view of this I 
considered myself left with no other option than 
the release of this document.

ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INTELLECTUALS

Bard has effectively crafted for itself an image 
as a bastion of progressive thought. Its efforts 
were crowned with being anointed in 2005 by the 
Princeton Review as the second-most progressive 
college in the United States, the journal adding 
that Bard "puts the 'liberal' in 'liberal arts.'" 
But "liberal" thought evidently has its limits; 
and my work against Zionism has encountered these.

A fundamental principle of mine is that the 
educator must criticize the injustices of the 
world, whether or not this involves him or her in 
conflict with the powers that be. The systematic 
failure of the academy to do so plays no small 
role in the perpetuation of injustice and state 
violence. In no sphere of political action does 
this principle apply more vigorously than with 
the question of Zionism; and in no country is 
this issue more strategically important than in 
the United States, given the fact that United 
States support is necessary for Israel's 
behavior. The worse this behavior, the more 
strenuous must be the suppression of criticism. I 
take the view, then, that Israeli human rights 
abuses are deeply engrained in a culture of 
impunity granted chiefly, though not exclusively, 
in the United States-which culture arises from 
suppression of debate and open inquiry within 
those institutions, such as colleges, whose 
social role it is to enlighten the public. 
Therefore, if the world stands outraged at 
Israeli aggression in Gaza, it should also be 
outraged at institutions in the United States 
that grant Israel impunity. In my view, Bard 
College is one such institution. It has 
suppressed critical engagement with Israel and 
Zionism, and therefore has enabled abuses such as 
have occurred and are occurring in Gaza. This 
notion is of course, not just descriptive of a 
place like Bard. It is also the context within 
which the critic of such a place and the Zionist 
ideology it enables becomes marginalized, and 
then removed.

For further information: www.codz.org; Joel 
Kovel, "Overcoming Impunity," The Link, Jan-March 
2009 (www.ameu.org).

To write the Bard administration:

President Leon Botstein <mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]>
Executive Vice-President Dimitri Papadimitriou 
<mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to