And this refers only to those who "encounted registration problems or 
failed to receive
absentee ballots."

The former category would include, along with those sidelined by the 
voter ID laws in
Indiana and Georgia, all those who were registered, but showed up at 
the polls only to
find that they'd been stricken from the rolls. And such 
disenfranchisement was either
"legal," as BushCo's DoJ had been conducting quiet voter purges 
nationwide, or illegal,
as partisan free-lancers cleansed the voter rolls of those who would 
have cast a ballot for
the Evil Ones. (Those voter rolls now being electronic, such deletion 
is a snap for anyone
with access to them.)

Now, the number of those disenfranchised certainly was even higher 
than MIT's report
suggests, since it refers exclusively to registration hurdles and 
missing absentee ballots.
There were also many voters who could not wait on the endless lines 
that formed in
Democratic precincts only, there having been too few machines placed 
there, and/or
machines that didn't work. (The same thing happened in 2004 and 2006.)

And then there were those citizens whose votes were not suppressed, 
but electronically
erased or altered: a type of disenfranchisement not noted by the 
researchers at MIT, who
looked exclusively at vote suppression, not election fraud. But, just 
as in 2004 and 2006,
so in 2008 there were numerous firsthand reports of voters seeing 
their votes "flipped"
right before their eyes--a problem that afflicted many Democrats and 
just a handful
of Republicans. And those reports point only to a fraction of the 
ballots altered
electronically, since it's quite easy to flip votes without its being 
perceptible.

It's therefore very likely that the number of those disenfranchised 
in this last election,
by whatever means, was actually far higher than the 4/5 million here 
reported. We may
conservatively estimate that it was more like 7 to 8 million US 
citizens who couldn't vote;
and we may add with confidence that most of those blocked voters 
would have voted
for Obama, and also would have voted Democratic in their local House 
and Senate races.

What this means is that (a) this president won by a landslide, not 
merely a "decisive"
margin, and that (b) the GOP is, more than ever, a fringe party--and 
(c) a party that
relies on every dirty trick and tactic in the book to "win" in our 
elections, so as to push
their program on the rest of us despite the will of the electorate. 
And what this means is
that (e) our degraded voting system now needs radical reform, or else 
that undead party
will keep "coming back" until they've ruined everything.
MCM

Hurdles to Voting Persisted in 2008

By 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/u/ian_urbina/index.html?inline=nyt-per>IAN
 
URBINA
Published: March 10, 2009

WASHINGTON - Four million to five million voters did not cast a 
ballot in the 2008 presidential election because they encountered 
registration problems or failed to receive absentee ballots, which is 
roughly the same number of voters who encountered such problems in 
the 2000 election, according to an academic study to be presented to 
the Senate Rules Committee on Wednesday.

An additional two million to four million registered voters - or 1 
percent to 2 percent of the eligible electorate - were "discouraged" 
from voting due to administrative hassles, like long lines and voter 
identification requirements, the study found.

The study, which draws from a survey of about 33,000 eligible voters, 
was conducted in October and November 2008 by the Cooperative 
Congressional Election Survey, a consortium of more than 150 
university researchers, led by the 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/m/massachusetts_institute_of_technology/index.html?inline=nyt-org>Massachusetts
 
Institute of Technology, who specialize in voting issues.

The study found that the most common registration problems involved 
clerical errors, like entering voter information incorrectly in 
statewide databases, or voters who changed their address but failed 
to inform election officials. At least 4 percent of eligible voters 
surveyed said they requested absentee ballots but failed to receive 
them.

-snip



<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/us/politics/11vote.html?_r=2&ref=us>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/us/politics/11vote.html?_r=2&ref=us
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to