And so George Washington is still the only US president to yield authority.
MCM

Handling Of 'State Secrets' At Issue


Like Predecessor, New Justice Dept. Claiming Privilege

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 25, 2009; A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/24/AR2009032403501_pf.html

Civil liberties advocates are accusing the Obama administration of 
forsaking campaign rhetoric and adopting the same expansive arguments 
that his predecessor used to cloak some of the most sensitive 
intelligence-gathering programs of the Bush White House.

The first signs have come just weeks into the new administration, in 
a case filed by an Oregon charity suspected of funding terrorism. 
President Obama's Justice Department not only sought to dismiss the 
lawsuit by arguing that it implicated "state secrets," but also 
escalated the standoff -- proposing that government lawyers might 
take classified documents from the court's custody to keep the 
charity's representatives from reviewing them.

The suit by the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation has proceeded further 
than any other in challenging the use of warrantless wiretaps, 
threatening to expose the inner workings of that program. It is the 
second time the new Justice Department has followed its predecessors 
in claiming the state-secrets privilege, which would allow the 
government to exclude evidence in a civil case on grounds that it 
jeopardizes national security.

Attorneys for al-Haramain are seeking monetary damages from officials 
at the White House, the National Security Agency, the Treasury 
Department and the FBI, saying that the government's alleged illegal 
eavesdropping of the charity's board members and attorneys five years 
ago violated the charity's rights of due process and freedom of 
speech. Representatives of the charity, whose U.S. operations have 
gone out of business, say that its purpose was philanthropic and that 
authorities have no evidence that it funded terrorism.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco has resisted 
Justice Department attempts to claim the state-secrets privilege, 
making it one of the only cases to survive such a government 
challenge. Over the past eight years, authorities successfully 
invoked that argument dozens of times to prevent civil liberties 
groups from winning access to highly classified materials on a range 
of topics, including secret overseas prisons for terrorism suspects 
and warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens.

In his campaign plan to "change Washington," Obama criticized the 
Bush administration, saying that it had "ignored public disclosure 
rules" and that it too often invoked the state-secrets privilege, 
according to his Web site.

Now, Obama's claim of state secrets has prompted criticism.

"There has to be other ways to protect secret information without 
having to block accountability," said Erwin Chemerinsky, a law 
professor at the University of California at Irvine. He said that 
"state secrets" has become a sort of "talismanic phrase" uttered by 
government officials who want to dispose of inconvenient or troubling 
challenges to their authority.

Legal scholars say there are legitimate reasons for the state-secrets 
privilege, pointing out that it may be necessary to keep from 
disclosing government sources and methods of intelligence gathering. 
And Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller countered the 
criticism, saying that "in just two months, the Justice Department 
has already moved on a number of fronts to ensure Americans have 
access to information about their government's actions, and with 
respect to state secrets, the attorney general has ordered a review 
of pending cases to ensure the privilege is only invoked when 
absolutely necessary."

In the al-Haramain case, Obama has not only maintained the Bush 
administration approach, but the dispute has intensified, with the 
Justice Department warning that if the judge does not change his 
mind, authorities could spirit away the top-secret documents.

"Any way you look at it, it's pretty remarkable," said Jon B. 
Eisenberg, an attorney for al-Haramain. "This is an executive branch 
threat to exercise control over a judicial branch function."

Walker's ruling, which could come at any time, is unlikely to end the 
disagreement and, if challenged, could bring the matter before the 
U.S. Supreme Court for the first time in a generation.

Last month, a bipartisan Senate group, including Judiciary Committee 
Chairman 
<http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/l000174/>Patrick 
J. Leahy (D-Vt.) and ranking Republican 
<http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/s000709/>Arlen 
Specter (Pa.), introduced legislation that would require judges to 
look at the classified evidence when the government makes the 
state-secrets claim, rather than rely only on its account of the 
sensitivity of the materials.

Leahy noted that the state-secrets privilege effectively bars people 
who have experienced serious privacy violations or even torture from 
seeking justice in court. He expressed particular alarm over the case 
of Khaled al-Masri, a German citizen who said he was kidnapped and 
held for months in a CIA-run prison where he was tortured. A federal 
judge dismissed Masri's suit after the CIA director said it would 
harm national security.

Said Leahy: "For the aggrieved parties, it means that the courthouse 
doors are closed -- forever -- regardless of the severity of their 
injury."

Six weeks ago, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. disappointed civil 
libertarians by invoking the state-secrets claim in a case against a 
Boeing Co. subsidiary accused of transporting five terrorism suspects 
to countries where they were tortured.

Three Bush administration lawyers said they were not surprised that 
the new team had revived at least some of their arguments. Once in 
office, the lawyers said, White House officials -- regardless of 
political affiliation -- tend to support assertions of executive 
power to keep from tying their hands in future disputes.

"If you want to protect state secrets, you've got to have a pretty 
broad doctrine," said Stewart Baker, a former top lawyer at the 
Department of Homeland Security and the NSA.

The al-Haramain case began in early 2004 when the FBI quietly 
executed search warrants at the charity's headquarters in Ashland, 
Ore. The Treasury Department froze al-Haramain's assets the next day 
and ultimately concluded that the charity was a terrorist front.

Later, government officials mistakenly sent the charity's attorneys a 
classified phone surveillance log -- buried in a stack of documents 
-- suggesting that al-Haramain board members and some of its 
attorneys had been wiretapped. Soon after the materials were sent, 
FBI agents raced to collect the sensitive pages.

In 2006, lawyers and charity officials sued the government, pointing 
to the secret pages as evidence that their phone and e-mail 
communication had been monitored without court warrants.

Walker, the San Francisco-based judge, found that anecdotal evidence 
of the eavesdropping program was sufficient and allowed the 
al-Haramain case to proceed.

In the waning days of the Bush administration, the judge ordered the 
government to grant security clearances to al-Haramain lawyers, which 
it did. But Obama's Justice Department lawyers and NSA officials 
continue to resist the orders to draft a plan for how the case could 
move forward.

In a Feb. 27 filing, Justice lawyers said the judge lacks authority 
"to order the government to grant counsel access to classified 
information when the executive branch has denied them such access."

Both sides await Walker's next step.

"At this point," said Eisenberg, the al-Haramain attorney, "I don't 
feel like I need to do anything. The outrage speaks for itself."
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to