Reform Is Needed. Reform Is in the Air. We Can't Afford to Fail.

Friday 27 March 2009

by: Joseph Stiglitz  |  Visit article original @ The Guardian UK

<>http://www.truthout.org/032809Y


     The task is to build a new financial 
architecture. If we flunk it, the pain will 
strike most cruelly in the world's poorest 
countries.

     The financial crisis that began in America's 
sub-prime mortgage market has now become a global 
recession - with growth projected to be a 
negative 1.5%, the worst performance since the 
Great Depression. Even countries that had done 
everything right are seeing marked declines in 
growth rates, and even deep recessions. And much 
of the most acute pain will be felt by developing 
countries.

     A UN commission of experts on reforms of the 
international monetary and financial system, 
which I chair, has just published its preliminary 
report. It focuses especially on the impact of 
the crisis on developing countries and the poor 
everywhere, which is likely to be severe. An 
estimated 30 million more people will be 
unemployed in 2009 compared to 2007. The increase 
could even reach 50 million. Progress in reducing 
poverty may be halted. The report warns that: 
"Some 200 million people, mostly in developing 
economies, could be pushed into poverty if rapid 
action is not taken to counter the impact of the 
crisis."

     While this is a global crisis, responses are 
undertaken by national governments, who quite 
naturally look after their own citizens' interest 
first. Particularly invidious are protectionist 
measures, such as the US "buy America" provision 
in its stimulus package. In fact, the World Bank 
reports that 17 of the group of 20 countries have 
engaged in protectionist measures, after making a 
commitment not to do so in their meeting in 
Washington in November. By focusing on national, 
as opposed to global impacts, the global stimulus 
will be less - and the global recovery weakened.

     While there is a consensus that all countries 
should undertake strong fiscal stimulus measures, 
many developing countries do not have the 
resources, and it calls for a concerted approach 
for additional funding, both for spending and 
liquidity support for countries and corporations 
in developing countries that are strained by the 
current credit crunch. Developed countries should 
contribute 1% of stimulus spending; there should 
be an immediate issue of special drawing rights 
(SDRs), the "IMF money" that can be used 
especially to help those facing difficulties, and 
an expansion of regional efforts, such as the 
Chang Mai initiative in Asia.

     It is important that any assistance be 
provided without the usual strings. Conditions 
such as those which force developing countries to 
contract spending and raise interest rates are 
counterproductive: the intent of the assistance 
is to help them expand their economies, thereby 
assisting the global recovery. Deficiencies in 
current institutional arrangements for disbursing 
funds - for example, through the IMF - have long 
been noted, but the reforms so far are 
insufficient. Countries with funds are often 
reluctant to give money to institutions in which 
they have little voice, and which have advocated 
policies that they do not support; and countries 
are often reluctant to borrow, given the stigma 
associated with turning to these institutions. 
The commission urges the creation of a new credit 
facility, in which the voice of the new providers 
of finance and the borrowers are both better 
heard.

     There are several important lessons to be 
learned from the crisis. One is that there is a 
need for better regulation. But reforms cannot be 
just cosmetic, and they have to go beyond the 
financial sector. Inadequate enforcement of 
competition laws has allowed banks to grow to be 
too big to fail. Inadequate corporate governance 
resulted in incentive schemes that led to 
excessive risk taking and short sighted behavior, 
which did not even serve shareholders well.

     The Commission recommends the establishment 
of a Global Economic Coordinating Council, not 
only to co-ordinate economic policy, but to 
assess the economic situation, identify gaps in 
the global institutional arrangement, and propose 
solutions. For instance, there is a need for a 
Global Financial Regulatory Authority - without 
which there is a risk of regulatory arbitrage, 
undermining regulation, and creating a race to 
the bottom. There is a need for a Global 
Competition Authority - markets are global in 
scale. There is a need for a better way of 
handling defaults of countries, of which there 
may be several in this crisis. And there is a 
need for better ways of managing the many risks 
that developing countries face, especially with 
debt and capital account management.

     The other important commission recommendation 
concerns the creation of a new global reserve 
system. The existing system, with the US dollar 
as reserve currency, is fraying. The dollar has 
been volatile. There are increasing worries about 
future inflationary risks. At the same time, 
putting so much money aside every year to protect 
countries against the risks of global instability 
creates a downward bias in - aggregate demand - 
weakening the global economy. Moreover, the 
system has the peculiar property that poor 
countries are lending trillions of dollars to the 
US, at essentially zero interest rate, while 
within their country there are so many needs to 
which the money could be put. The Commission 
argues that a new Global Reserve System is 
"feasible, non-inflationary, and could be easily 
implemented".

     After the East Asia crisis, there was much 
talk of reform, of a new global financial 
architecture. But there was just talk; as the 
global economy recovered, the impetus for reform 
faded. This is a more severe crisis. It will last 
longer. Hopefully, this time, we learn our lesson.

     ---------

     Joseph E Stiglitz is university professor at 
Columbia University, chairman of the UN 
Commission of Experts on Reforms of the 
International Monetary and Financial System and 
recipient of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics.

ยป

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, 
THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO 
THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN 
RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH 
AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO 
AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF 
THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR 
SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A 
CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR 
VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS 
ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR 
ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO 
MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN 
CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to