From Gianni Ortiz:

NAIS, as it is written, wouldn't improve this situation.

A couple of related links below.

<http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2009/1/27/63221/5325>Pork superbug documented
As evidence mounts of deadly bacteria from CAFO pigs, will the FDA
and the USDA act?

Posted by <http://gristmill.grist.org/user/Tom%20Philpott>Tom 
Philpott at 9:33 PM on 27 Jan 2009

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2009/1/27/63221/5325

Last June, Iowa State researcher Tara Smith delivered preliminary results
of a study linking the deadly, antibiotic-resistant pathogen MRSA to 
pigs in concentrated animal feedlot operations. Despite mounting 
evidence of the
link from Canada and Europe, U.S. public-health officials had never 
formally studied the issue, even though MRSA kills something close to 
20,000 Americans every year -- more than AIDS.

In a 
<http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/secretingredients/archives/140336.asp>must-read
 
blog post at the time, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer's ace health 
reporter Andrew Schneider documents the craven inaction of the FDA 
and the USDA as this public-health menace gained force. (I weighed in 
<http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/6/9/223012/0671>here.)

As Schneider wrote:

"An effective way to say there isn't a problem is never to look. That seems
to be precisely what most U.S. government food-safety agencies are 
doing when it comes to determining whether the livestock in our food 
supply is contaminated with MRSA and if so, whether the often-fatal 
bacterium is
being passed on to consumers who buy and consume that meat"

Now Smith's research has been 
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145257?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum>published
 
in a peer-reviewed journal. Examining CAFOs scattered in Iowa and 
Illinois, Smith and her team found the MRSA strain in 49 percent of 
pigs and 45 percent of the workers who
tend them. The sample size is small; more study must be done. Will 
the government undertake it?

A real reckoning with the MRSA-CAFO link could deliver a devastating blow
to the meat industry. To keep animals alive while stuffed together by 
the thousands, standing in their own collected waste, it's evidently 
necessary to dose them with lots of antibiotics. CAFO conditions 
destroy animal's immune systems; antibiotics pick up the slack. Take 
them away, and the CAFO model might crumble.

That, presumably, is why the Bush agencies so studiously ignored the 
problem. Let's hope the Obama FDA and USDA do better.

Update [2009-1-28 8:40:10 by Tom Philpott]:

The Seattle PI's indispensable Schneider 
<http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/secretingredients/archives/160278.asp>reacts
 
to the publication of Smith's findings:

"So I called some disease detectives and food safety specialists in 
agencies responsible for ensuring that our food supply is safe. You 
could almost hear them cringe over the phone. And, no, to the best of 
their knowledge, neither the FDA, USDA nor CDC had launched 
systematic testing of the U.S. meat supply for MRSA. One physician 
said that a study was being done on the MRSA strain (ST398) that 
Smith had found on the pigs but added, 'I don't think it has anything 
to do with meat.'"

Flies may be spreading MRSA from fowl feces - Infectious diseases
(Can you microchip a fly?)
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29728139/>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29728139/

Antibiotic ban on livestock may hurt U.S. food safety
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29861403/>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29861403/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to