Hersh elaborates.

MCM

Seymour Hersh: Secret U.S. Forces Carried Out 
Assassinations in 'a Lot of' Countries, Including 
in
Latin America
By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!
Posted on March 31, 2009, Printed on April 1, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/story/134347/

Amy Goodman: Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative 
journalist Seymour Hersh created a stir last 
month when he said the Bush administration ran an 
executive assassination ring that reported 
directly to Vice President Dick Cheney. Hersh 
made the comment during a speech at the 
University of Minnesota on March 10th.

Seymour Hersh: Congress has no oversight of it. 
It's an executive assassination wing, 
essentially. And it's been going on and on and 
on. And just today in the Times there was a story 
saying that its leader, a three-star admiral 
named McRaven, ordered a stop to certain 
activities because there were so many collateral 
deaths. It's been going in -- under President 
Bush's authority, they've been going into 
countries, not talking to the ambassador or to 
the CIA station chief, and finding people on a 
list and executing them and leaving.

Amy Goodman: Yesterday, CNN interviewed Dick 
Cheney's former national security adviser, John 
Hannah. Wolf Blitzer asked Hannah about Sy 
Hersh's claim.

Wolf Blitzer: Is there a list of terrorists, 
suspected terrorists out there who can be 
assassinated?
John Hannah: There is clearly a group of people 
that go through a very extremely well-vetted 
process, inter-agency process, as I think was 
explained in your piece, that have committed acts 
of war against the United States, who are at war 
with the United States, or are suspected of 
planning operations of war against the United 
States, who authority is given to the troops in 
the field and in certain war theaters to capture 
or kill those individuals. That is certainly true.
Wolf Blitzer: And so, this would be, and from 
your perspective -- and you worked in the Bush 
administration for many year-- it would be 
totally constitutional, totally legal, to go out 
and find these guys and to whack 'em.
John Hannah: There's no question that in a 
theater of war, when we are at war, and we know 
-- there's no doubt, we are still at war against 
al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and on 
that Pakistani border, that our troops have the 
authority to go after and capture and kill the 
enemy, including the leadership of the enemy.

Amy Goodman: That's John Hannah, Dick Cheney's 
former national security adviser. Seymour Hersh 
joins me now here in Washington, D.C., staff 
writer for The New Yorker magazine. His latest 
article appears in the current issue, called 
"Syria Calling: The Obama Administration's Chance 
to Engage in a Middle East Peace."

OK, welcome to Democracy Now!, Sy Hersh. It was 
good to see you last night at Georgetown. Talk 
about, first, these comments you made at the 
University of Minnesota.

Seymour Hersh: Well, it was sort of stupid of me 
to start talking about stuff I haven't written. I 
always kick myself when I do it. But I was with 
Walter Mondale, the former vice president, who 
was being amazingly open and sort of, for him -- 
he had come a long way Š since I knew him as a 
senator who was reluctant to oppose the Vietnam 
War. And so, I was asked about future things, and 
I just -- I am looking into stuff. I've done -- 
there's really nothing I said at Minnesota I 
haven't written in the (New Yorker). Last summer, 
I wrote a long article about the Joint Special 
Operations Command.

And just to go back to what John Hannah, who Š I 
think ended up being the senior national security 
adviser, almost -- if not the chief of staff, 
deputy chief of staff for Dick Cheney in the last 
three or four years, what he said is simply that, 
yes, we go after people suspected -- that was the 
word he used -- of crimes against America. And I 
have to tell you that there's an executive order, 
signed by Jerry Ford, President Ford, in the 
'70s, forbidding such action. It's not only 
contrary -- it's illegal, it's immoral, it's 
counterproductive.

The problem with having military go kill people 
when they're not directly in combat, these are 
asking American troops to go out and find people 
and, as you said earlier, in one of the 
statements I made that you played, they go into 
countries without telling any of the authorities, 
the American ambassador, the CIA chief, certainly 
nobody in the government that we're going into, 
and it's far more than just in combat areas. 
There's more -- at least a dozen countries, and 
perhaps more. The President has authorized these 
kinds of actions in the Middle East and also in 
Latin America, I will tell you, Central America, 
some countries. They've been -- our boys have 
been told they can go and take the kind of 
executive action they need, and that's simply -- 
there's no legal basis for it.

And not only that, if you look at Guantanamo, the 
American government knew by -- well, let's see, 
Guantanamo opened in early 2002. "Gitmo," they 
call it, the base down in Cuba for alleged 
al-Qaeda terrorists. An internal report that I 
wrote about in a book I did years ago, an 
internal report made by the summer of 2002, 
estimated that at least half and possibly more of 
those people had nothing to do with actions 
against America. The intelligence we have is 
often very fragmentary, not very good. And the 
idea that the American president would think he 
has the constitutional power or the legal right 
to tell soldiers not engaged in immediate combat 
to go out and find people based on lists and 
execute them is just amazing to me. It's amazing 
to me.

And not only that, Amy, the thing about George 
Bush is, everything's sort of done in plain 
sight. In his State of the Union address, I think 
January the 28th, 2003, about a month and a half 
before we went into Iraq, Bush was describing the 
progress in the war, and he said -- I'm 
paraphrasing, but this is pretty close -- he said 
that we've captured more than 3,000 members of 
al-Qaeda and suspected members, people suspected 
of operations against us. And then he added with 
that little smile he has, "And let me tell you, 
some of those people will not be able to ever 
operate again. I can assure you that. They will 
not be in a position." He's clearly talking about 
killing people, and to applause.

So, there we are. I don't back off what I said. I 
wish I hadn't said it ad hoc, because, like I 
hope we're going to talk about in a minute, I 
spend a lot of time writing stories for The New 
Yorker, and they're very carefully vetted, and 
sometimes when you speak off the top, you're not 
as precise.

Amy Goodman: Explain what the Joint Special 
Operations Command is and what oversight Congress 
has of it.

Seymour Hersh: Well, it's a special unit. We have 
something called the Special Operations Command 
that operates out of Florida, and it involves a 
lot of wings. And one of the units that work 
under the umbrella of the Special Operations 
Command is known as Joint Special Op -- JSOC. 
It's a special unit. What makes it so special, 
it's a group of elite people that include Navy 
Seals, some Navy Seals, Delta Force -- what we 
call our black units, the commando units. 
"Commando" is a word they don't like, but that's 
what we, most of us, refer to them as. And they 
promote from within. It's a unit that has its own 
promotion structure. And one of the elements, I 
must tell you, about getting ahead in promotion 
is the number of kills you have. Of course. 
Because it's basically devised -- it's been 
transmogrified, if you will, into this unit that 
goes after high-value targets.

And where Cheney comes in and the idea of an 
assassination ring -- I actually said "wing," but 
of an assassination wing -- that reports to 
Cheney was simply that they clear lists through 
the Vice President's office. He's not sitting 
around picking targets. They clear the lists. And 
he's certainly deeply involved, less and less as 
time went on, of course, but in the beginning 
very closely involved. And this is the elite 
unit. I think they do three-month tours. And last 
summer, I wrote a long article in The New Yorker, 
last July, about how the JSOC operation is simply 
not available, and there's no information 
provided by the executive to Congress.

Amy Goodman: What countries, Sy Hersh -- what countries are they operating in?

Seymour Hersh: A lot of countries.

Amy Goodman: Name some.

Seymour Hersh: No, because I haven't written 
about it, Amy. And I will tell you, as I say, in 
Central America, it's far more than just the 
areas that Mr. Hannah talked about -- 
Afghanistan, Iraq. You can understand an 
operation like this in the heat of battle in 
Iraq, killing, I mean, taking out enemy. That's 
war. But when you go into other countries -- 
let's say Yemen, let's say Peru, let's say 
Colombia, let's say Eritrea, let's say 
Madagascar, let's say Kenya, countries like that 
-- and kill people who are believed on a list to 
be al-Qaeda or al-Qaeda-linked or anti-American, 
you're violating most of the tenets.

We're a country that believes very much in due 
process. That's what it's all about. We don't 
give the President of United States the right to 
tell military people, even in a war -- and it's a 
war against an idea, war against terrorism. It's 
not as if we're at war against a committed 
uniformed enemy. It's a very complicated war 
we're in. And with each of those actions, of 
course, there's always collateral deaths, and 
there's always more people ending up becoming our 
enemies. That's the tragedy of Guantanamo. By the 
time people, whether they were with us or against 
us when they got there, by the time they've been 
there three or four months, they're dangerous to 
us, because of the way they've been treated Š

Amy Goodman: One question: Is the assassination 
wing continuing under President Obama?

Seymour Hersh: How do I know? I hope not.

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally 
syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!
© 2009 Democracy Now! All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/134347/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to