This guy should be our governor again.
MCM

The New York Fed is the most powerful financial institution you've 
never heard of. Look who's running it.

By Eliot Spitzer

<http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/>http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/

The kerfuffle about current New York Federal Reserve Bank Chairman 
Stephen Friedman's purchase of some Goldman stock while the Fed was 
involved in reviewing major decisions about Goldman's 
future-well-covered by the Wall Street Journal here and here-raises a 
fundamental question about Wall Street's corruption. Just as the 
millions in AIG bonuses obscured the much more significant issue of 
the $70 billion-plus in conduit payments authorized by the N.Y. Fed 
to AIG's counterparties, the small issue of Friedman's stock purchase 
raises very serious issues about the competence and composition of 
the Federal Reserve of New York, which is the most powerful financial 
institution most Americans know nothing about.

A quasi-independent, public-private body, the New York Fed is the 
first among equals of the 12 regional Fed branches. Unlike the 
Washington Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or the other regional 
fed branches, the N.Y. Fed is active in the markets virtually every 
day, changing the critical interest rates that determine the 
liquidity of the markets and the profitability of banks. And, like 
the other regional branches, it has boundless power to examine, at 
will, the books of virtually any banking institution and require that 
wide-ranging actions be taken-from raising capital to stopping 
lending-to ensure the stability and soundness of the bank. Over the 
past year, the New York Fed has been responsible for committing 
trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to resuscitate the coffers of 
the banks it oversees.

Given the power of the N.Y. Fed, it is time to ask some very hard 
questions about its recent performance. The first question to ask is: 
Who is the New York Fed? Who exactly has been running the show? Yes, 
we all know that Tim Geithner was the president and CEO of the N.Y. 
Fed from 2003 until his ascension as treasury secretary. But who 
chose him for that position, and to whom did he report? The N.Y. Fed 
president reports to, and is chosen by, the Fed board of directors.

So who selected Geithner back in 2003? Well, the Fed board created a 
select committee to pick the CEO. This committee included none other 
than Hank Greenberg, then the chairman of AIG; John Whitehead, a 
former chairman of Goldman Sachs; Walter Shipley, a former chairman 
of Chase Manhattan Bank, now JPMorgan Chase; and Pete Peterson, a 
former chairman of Lehman Bros. It was not a group of typical 
depositors worried about the security of their savings accounts but 
rather one whose interest was in preserving a capital structure and 
way of doing business that cried out for-but did not receive-harsh 
examination from the N.Y. Fed.

The composition of the New York Fed's board, which supervises the 
organization and current Chairman Friedman, is equally troubling. The 
board consists of nine individuals, three chosen by the N.Y. Fed 
member banks as their own representatives, three chosen by the member 
banks to represent the public, and three chosen by the national Fed 
Board of Governors to represent the public. In theory this sounds 
great: Six board members are "public" representatives.

So whom have the banks chosen to be the public representatives on the 
board during the past decade, as the crisis developed and unfolded? 
Dick Fuld, the former chairman of Lehman; Jeff Immelt, the chairman 
of GE; Gene McGrath, the chairman of Con Edison; Ronay Menschel, the 
chairwoman of Phipps Houses and also, not insignificantly, the wife 
of Richard Menschel, a former senior partner at Goldman. Whom did the 
Board of Governors choose as its public representatives? Steve 
Friedman, the former chairman of Goldman; Pete Peterson; Jerry 
Speyer, CEO of real estate giant Tishman Speyer; and Jerry Levin, the 
former chairman of Time Warner. These were the people who were 
supposedly representing our interests!

Of course, there have been the occasional nonfinance representatives 
from academia and labor. But they have been so outnumbered that their 
presence has done little to alter the direction of the board.

So is it any wonder that the N.Y. Fed has been complicit in the 
single greatest bailout of poorly managed banks in history? Any 
wonder that it has given-with virtually no strings 
attached-practically the entire contents of the Treasury to the very 
banks whose inability to manage risk has brought our economy to its 
knees? Any wonder that not a single CEO or senior executive of a 
major bank has been removed as a condition of hundreds of billions of 
direct cash and guarantees? Any wonder that, despite its fundamental 
responsibility to preserve the integrity of the banking system, it 
sat quietly on the sidelines as the leverage beneath the banks 
exploded and the capital underlying their investments shrank?

I do not mean to suggest that any of these board members 
intentionally discharged their duties with the specific goal of 
benefitting themselves. Rather, what we have seen is disastrous 
groupthink, a way of looking at the world from the perspective of 
Wall Street and Wall Street alone. That failure has brought the world 
economy to the edge of unraveling. And some of Geithner's early 
missteps betrayed an inability to get beyond this tunnel vision, such 
as the idea that the banks need to be first in line to be paid and to 
be paid in full. We can only hope that Geithner, who, to his credit, 
did try to raise some of the regulatory issues that mattered while he 
was at the Fed, is no longer in the mental prison of Lower Manhattan 
and will have more success now that he has a board of one-President 
Obama.

Perhaps it is time to calculate what these board members have been 
paid by their banks in salary and bonuses over the years and seek to 
have them return it to the public as small compensation for their 
failed oversight of the N.Y. Fed. And more fundamentally, perhaps it 
is time to take a hard look at the governing structure and supposed 
independence of this institution that actually controls the use of 
our tax dollars and, heaven help us, the fate of our economy.

Slate V: Timothy Geithner on Charlie Rose

Eliot Spitzer is the former governor of the state of New York.

Article URL: <http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/>http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/

Copyright 2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to