Busted, Pentagon: Why The Photos Probably Do Show Detainees Sodomized and Raped
Naomi Wolf

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/busted-pentagon-why-the-p_b_209046.html

The Telegraph of London broke the news--because the US press is in a 
drugged stupor--that the photos Obama is refusing to release of 
detainee abuse depict, among other sexual tortures, an American 
soldier raping a female detainee and a male translator raping a male 
prisoner. The paper claims the photos also show anal rape of 
prisoners with foreign objects such as wires and lightsticks. Major 
General Antonio Taguba calls the images `horrific' and `indecent' 
(but absurdly agrees that Obama should not release them - proving 
once again that the definition of hypocrisy is the assertion that the 
truth is in poor taste).

Predictably, a few hours later the Pentagon issues a formal denial.

It is very likely that the Pentagon lying. This is probably exactly 
what the photos show, because it happened. Precisely these exact sex 
crimes - these exact images and these very objects -- are familiar 
and well-documented to those of us who follow closely rights' 
organizations reports of what has already been confirmed.

As I wrote last year in my piece on sex crime against detainees, 'Sex 
Crimes in the White House," highly perverse, systematic sexual 
torture and sexual humiliation was, original documents reveal, 
directed from the top; Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice were present 
in meetings where sexual humiliation was discussed as policy; the 
Defense Authorization Act of 2007 was written specifically to allow 
certain kinds of sexual abuse, such as forced nakedness, which is 
completely illegal and understood by domestic and international law 
to be a form of sexual assault; Rumsfeld is in print and on the 
record consulting with subordinates about the policy and practice of 
sexual humiliation, in a collection of documents obtained by the ACLU 
by a Freedom of Information Act filing, compiled in Jameel Jaffer's 
important book, The Torture Administration.

The image of the female, probably Iraqi, prisoner being sexually 
assaulted? That image, or a similar one, has been widely viewed in 
the Muslim world. Reports of the rape scenes described have also 
appeared in rights organizations' summaries since 2004.

And scores of detainees who have told their stories to rights 
organizations have told independently confirming accounts of a highly 
consistent practice of sexual torture at US-held prisons, including 
having their genitals slashed with razors; electrodes placed on 
genitals; and being told US military would find and rape their 
mothers.

Is systemic sex crime practiced by the US in a consequence of the 
lawlessness of `the war on terror' surprising to those of us who work 
on issues of sexual abuse and war? It is totally predictable: when 
you give soldiers anywhere in the world the power, let alone the 
mandate, to hold women or men helpless, without recourse to law, 
kidnap them as a matter of policy - as US military kidnapped the 
wives of `insurgents' in order to compel them to turn themselves in - 
strip them naked, and threaten them, you have a completely 
predictable recipe for mass sexual assault. The magisterial study of 
rape in war, Susan Brownmiller's Men, Women and Rape, proves that.

But what is far scarier about these images Obama refuses to release 
and that the Pentagon is likely to be lying about now is that it is 
not the evidence of lower-level soldiers being corrupted by power - 
it is proof of the fact that the most senior leadership - Bush, 
Rumsfeld and Cheney, with Rice's collusion - were running a global 
sex crime trafficking ring with Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and Baghram as 
the holding sites. The sexual nature of the torture also gives the 
lie to Cheney's and others' defense of torture as somehow functional: 
the sexual perversity mandated from the top reveals that it was just 
plain old sick sadism gratified by a very sick form of pleasure. I 
also pointed out in `Sex Crimes in the White House' that the 
escalation of the sexual abuse showed the same classic pattern shown 
by sex criminals everywhere - you start with stripping the victim, 
keeping him or her completely in your power, and then you engage in 
greater and more violent excesses with more and more 
self-justification.

The lightsticks, for instance? We in the human rights world know 
about the lightsticks. Probably dozens of prisoners were sodomized 
with lightsticks. In the highly credible and very fully documented 
Physicians for Human Rights report, Broken Bodies, Broken Lives, 
doctors investigated the wounds and scars of former prisoners, did 
analysis of the injuries, assessed the independent verification of 
their stories, and reported that indeed many detainees had in fact 
been savagely raped with lightsticks and by other objects inserted 
into their rectums, many sustaining internal injuries. This same 
report confirms that female military or other unidentified 
US-affiliated personnel were used to sexually abuse detainees by 
smearing menstrual blood on their faces, seizing their genitals 
violently, or rubbing them against their will in a sexual manner. In 
other credible accounts collected by human rights organizations, many 
former prisoners in US-held prisons report that they had been 
tortured or humiliated by female agents who appeared to be dressed 
like prostitutes. Indeed, early on intelligence spokespeople boasted 
in theNew York Times of the use of female agents to sexually abuse 
and humiliate prisoners: it was called in their own material 
'invasion of space by a female.'

Today at lunch, I happen to have sat next to the lovely and brave 
Dale Haddon, the `face of L'Oreal' who is also a tireless advocate 
for women and children through Unicef. She is heading for Congo, to 
help hold accountable rape and sex crime institutionalized as acts of 
war. Those criminals will face trials and convictions. In Sierra 
Leone, the soldiers and generals who used rape as an instrument of 
war have been tried and many convicted. In Bosnia, likewise. But at 
another lunch party, Haddon, who travels in many circles, may well be 
seated next to our own former leaders, violent and systemic sex 
criminals who are still at large.

When will we convict our very own global rapists, the ones who gave 
the US the hellish distinction of turning us into the superpower of 
sex crime? Convictions must come but first we must see the evidence.

And women especially, who understand how sexual abuse and rape can 
break the spirit in a uniquely anguishing way, should be raising 
their voices loudly.

Whom are we protecting by not releasing the photos? The victims? 
Hardly. It's, as feminists have been saying for decades, not their 
shame. The perpetrators? Their crimes are archived; if not this 
administration, another may well obey the law release the images, 
which are evidentiary. (Again: that rape and sodomy were directed 
form the top; prosecute those at the top.)

These photos go to exactly why Obama is burning what is left of the 
shreds of the Constitution by calling for preemptive detention for 
about 100 detainees. It ain't because they are `too dangerous,' his 
pathetic justification. It is because their bodies are crime scenes. 
It is because the torture, including possibly the sexual assault, 
they experienced is likely to be so horrific that if they were ever 
to have their day in court it is others whom Obama needs who would be 
incriminated.

In the nineteenth century, when a woman had been raped, or had 
experienced sexual abuse in the family, the paterfamilias would say 
she was crazy, get her declared `too dangerous' to be free, and lock 
her up forever so her story would be interred with her. That is what 
Obama is trying to do with preemptive detention for these detainees.

Well, America? Do you want to live with this? Remember: history shows 
categorically that once the state can lock `them' up without a fair 
trial, torture, rape them or sodomize them - well; sooner or later it 
will be able to do the same to your children or mine; or to you and 
me.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to