>From Gianni Ortiz:

Hi Mark,

We need to demand that Senators Gillibrand 
(202-225-1168) and Schumer (202-225-1168) vote 
against this bill in its current form when it 
comes up for a vote. We also need to educate 
people about the true purpose of this 
legislation. If it's voted down, it needs to be 
amended to meet the needs of small farms and 
producers. You can call more than once, and faxes 
are the most effective. People must do both.

Many feel that the Senate will be too busy with 
the health care bill to deal with this one 
quickly. But let's now how this bill passed in 
the House: They voted on it two days in a row, 
resorting to an overnight rule-change: from 
requiring a two-thirds majority, which they 
failed to achieve, to a simple majority--with the 
vote held after no debate, with no amendments.

So there's good reason for concern that something 
similar will happen in the Senate--
and, very possibly, within the next two weeks.

The biggest problem is that very few of us have 
even heard about this legislation. So people have 
to learn about the bill, the take immediate 
action.

Outside of New York, you can find your Senator 
here: 
<http://www.senate.gov/>http://www.senate.gov/.
Best,
Gianni



>
Pass, or pay food bill?

By Francesca Olsen
Hudson-Catskill Newspapers

<http://www.registerstar.com/articles/2009/09/08/news/doc4aa5dda0ba972867881443.txt>http://www.registerstar.com/articles/2009/09/08/news/doc4aa5dda0ba972867881443.txt

Published:

Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:16 AM CDT



As the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 (HR 
2749/S510) makes its way to the U.S. Senate, 
concerns in the local community continue to mount 
about the  effect such a bill will have on the 
farmers of Columbia County, as well as the nation.

The bill already passed in the U.S. House of 
Representatives July 30, with 283 ayes, 142 nays, 
and 8 present/not voting. It will head to the 
Senate when it is scheduled to reconvene today.

Gianni Ortiz, executive director of the Regional 
Farm and Food project, a non-profit dedicated to 
promoting sustainable agriculture and local food 
systems in the Hudson Valley, is concerned about 
the potential implications for local farms. "Our 
farmers, especially small farms, are a national 
treasure," she said. "We can't be making it 
impossible for them to do this."

Ortiz refers to a yearly registration for all 
farms with the Federal Drug administration (FDA) 
at a cost of $500; FDA-approved methods by which 
crops are raised and harvested, and a full Hazard 
Analysis Critical Control Point Plan (HACCP plan) 
for every type of produce sold or processed, all 
included in the bill. She says this kind of 
regulation translates into additional cost and 
off-field man hours that small farms will not be 
able to afford or survive.

A guide to developing a HACCP plan from the Food 
and Agriculture Organization of the United 
Nations outlines 12 tasks required to develop 
such a plan, and calls for the work of several 
specialists, such as a mycotoxicologist and 
process engineer. Hazards must be identified, 
information must be recorded, and appropriate 
control measures must be considered, adding up to 
a lengthy process.

"We're going to lose farms this year anyway," 
said Ortiz, referencing an abysmal growing season 
here in Columbia County. "And we have so many new 
farmers. One of the most exciting things that is 
happening is that we have young people coming 
into farming."


"Obviously, the math around farming is very 
challenging. You cannot purchase a farm and 
expect to pay the mortgage by farming," Ortiz 
said. "Young farmers have a lot of challenges. 
They probably don't own their land. If they have 
additional administrative demands and fees on top 
of it - it's just the wrong thing at the wrong 
time.

In Columbia County, farming is and has been a 
cornerstone of the local economy. "We happen to 
be blessed with a lot of artisanal processors and 
farms. It's one of our greatest distinguishing 
marks. And this will impact each and every one of 
them," said Ortiz.


During the vote in the U.S. House, congressmen 
John Hall, NY-19, and Scott Murphy, NY-20, voted 
yes on HR 2749; Maurice Hinchey, NY-22, voted no. 
Hinchey was part of a group of congressmen who 
sponsored the Kaptur/Farr Amendment, which 
recommends changes to the Food Safety Act.

The proposal recommends "removing unintended 
negative impacts on family farms, local and 
regional food systems, conservation and the 
environment."

"We are particularly concerned about the impact 
of the bill on the growing numbers of farms 
across the country that combine agricultural 
production with on-farm, value-added processing," 
the introduction letter to the amendment reads.

Among other suggestions, the Kaptur/Farr 
amendment to the bill suggests a sliding scale 
for facility registration fees "for farms that 
qualify by virtue of their processing activities."

"This needs to be scaled appropriately and 
science-based," said Ortiz. "I would say unless 
people are made aware of this and pay attention 
to it that it probably will get passed."

Several letters concerning HR 2749 have already 
been published in the Register-Star  prior to the 
vote in the house of representatives.  Peter 
Sagal of Philmont wrote a letter asking 
Congressman Murphy to vote against the bill 
"unless the proposals included in the Kaptur/Farr 
letter are included in the final bill."

Henry Smedley of Millerton also encouraged 
congressmen to vote no in order to "allow small, 
local farmers to continue to exist without 
burdensome regulations that are geared toward the 
large, industrial food companies that have 
created the food safety problems."

Nick Franceschelli of Ghent also wrote in to 
oppose the bill, "on the grounds that it would 
inevitably brutally stifle the one area of 
economic activity that will be the cornerstone of 
a revitalized economy, namely local and regional 
food systems."

Ortiz said that most food safety issues arise 
from the growing and harvesting practices at 
large factory farms, citing infamous incidents 
concerning bagged lettuce contaminated with 
salmonella.

"If you contrast that with how small farmers 
harvest, it's a person with a set of eyes and a 
brain, in the light of day inspecting each cut 
leaf or head of greens. It's a human, one-on-one 
process," she said. "Now our representatives can 
say that they did something about food safety, 
which for all intents and purposes is basically 
to hamper the efforts of those providing the 
safest food in the system."

Ortiz said she has been trying to get an 
appointment with congressman Murphy to discuss 
the bill but has so far been unsuccessful.

For more information about the Food Safety 
Enhancement Act of 2009, visit 
<http://www.thomas.loc.gov>www.thomas.loc.gov for 
a full list of votes, status updates, and a 
summary and full text of the proposed bill.

                 ***

To reach reporter Francesca Olsen call 
518-828-1616, ext. 2272, or e-mail 
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected].



Copyright © 2009 - The Register Star Online





__._,_.___

._,___






>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<attachment: image001 193.gif>>

Reply via email to